抗抑郁和心血管药物在活性炭上的吸附:阿米替林、安非他酮、米诺地尔、心得安和文拉法辛。

IF 3.3
Hunter B Wood, Stella M Trickett, Joseph T Dosch, Dazhe J Cao, Stefanie A Sydlik
{"title":"抗抑郁和心血管药物在活性炭上的吸附:阿米替林、安非他酮、米诺地尔、心得安和文拉法辛。","authors":"Hunter B Wood, Stella M Trickett, Joseph T Dosch, Dazhe J Cao, Stefanie A Sydlik","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2025.2532625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overdoses involving antidepressant and cardiovascular drugs account for 21.9% of non-opioid overdose-related fatalities in the United States. Activated charcoal is commonly used for gastrointestinal decontamination, but data regarding its adsorption efficacy for several clinically relevant drugs remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the adsorption of amitriptyline, bupropion, minoxidil, propranolol, and venlafaxine to activated charcoal by fitting adsorption isotherm data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kinetics and adsorption isotherm experiments were conducted using simulated gastric fluid (pH 1.2) and simulated intestinal fluid (pH 6.8). Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm equations were fitted to experimental data to model adsorption behavior. Drug-specific activated charcoal-to-drug ratios required to achieve ≥95% adsorption were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All five drugs were adsorbed effectively to activated charcoal although adsorption efficiencies varied by pH. Maximal adsorption capacities of all drugs were higher in simulated intestinal fluid compared to simulated gastric fluid. In simulated intestinal fluid, ≥95% of bupropion was adsorbed at a 10:1 activated charcoal-to-drug ratio, while this level was not reached in simulated gastric fluid even at a 12:1 ratio. Amitriptyline and propranolol reached ≥95% adsorption at ratios below 10:1. Venlafaxine and minoxidil required higher ratios of activated charcoal ratios to reach maximal adsorption. Activated charcoal had a higher drug-binding capacity in simulated intestinal fluid, but binding was stronger in simulated gastric fluid. Bupropion was adsorbed more in simulated intestinal fluid overall, though efficiency decreased at higher concentrations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A single 50 g dose of activated charcoal at 10:1 ratio may be inadequate for clinically significant overdoses of bupropion, minoxidil, and venlafaxine, especially for immediate release bupropion for which gastric adsorption may be important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the use of activated charcoal for gastrointestinal decontamination in overdoses involving amitriptyline, bupropion, minoxidil, propranolol, and venlafaxine. However, drug-specific differences in adsorption behavior suggest a need for refined dosing strategies, particularly in cases involving drugs with lower binding efficiencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520593,"journal":{"name":"Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"666-674"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adsorption of antidepressant and cardiovascular drugs to activated charcoal: amitriptyline, bupropion, minoxidil, propranolol, and venlafaxine.\",\"authors\":\"Hunter B Wood, Stella M Trickett, Joseph T Dosch, Dazhe J Cao, Stefanie A Sydlik\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15563650.2025.2532625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overdoses involving antidepressant and cardiovascular drugs account for 21.9% of non-opioid overdose-related fatalities in the United States. Activated charcoal is commonly used for gastrointestinal decontamination, but data regarding its adsorption efficacy for several clinically relevant drugs remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the adsorption of amitriptyline, bupropion, minoxidil, propranolol, and venlafaxine to activated charcoal by fitting adsorption isotherm data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kinetics and adsorption isotherm experiments were conducted using simulated gastric fluid (pH 1.2) and simulated intestinal fluid (pH 6.8). Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm equations were fitted to experimental data to model adsorption behavior. Drug-specific activated charcoal-to-drug ratios required to achieve ≥95% adsorption were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All five drugs were adsorbed effectively to activated charcoal although adsorption efficiencies varied by pH. Maximal adsorption capacities of all drugs were higher in simulated intestinal fluid compared to simulated gastric fluid. In simulated intestinal fluid, ≥95% of bupropion was adsorbed at a 10:1 activated charcoal-to-drug ratio, while this level was not reached in simulated gastric fluid even at a 12:1 ratio. Amitriptyline and propranolol reached ≥95% adsorption at ratios below 10:1. Venlafaxine and minoxidil required higher ratios of activated charcoal ratios to reach maximal adsorption. Activated charcoal had a higher drug-binding capacity in simulated intestinal fluid, but binding was stronger in simulated gastric fluid. Bupropion was adsorbed more in simulated intestinal fluid overall, though efficiency decreased at higher concentrations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A single 50 g dose of activated charcoal at 10:1 ratio may be inadequate for clinically significant overdoses of bupropion, minoxidil, and venlafaxine, especially for immediate release bupropion for which gastric adsorption may be important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the use of activated charcoal for gastrointestinal decontamination in overdoses involving amitriptyline, bupropion, minoxidil, propranolol, and venlafaxine. However, drug-specific differences in adsorption behavior suggest a need for refined dosing strategies, particularly in cases involving drugs with lower binding efficiencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"666-674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2025.2532625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2025.2532625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,抗抑郁药和心血管药物过量占非阿片类药物过量相关死亡人数的21.9%。活性炭通常用于胃肠道净化,但关于其对几种临床相关药物的吸附效果的数据仍然有限。目的:拟合吸附等温线,考察活性炭对阿米替林、安非他酮、米诺地尔、心得洛尔和文拉法辛的吸附性能。方法:用模拟胃液(pH 1.2)和模拟肠液(pH 6.8)进行动力学和吸附等温线实验。采用Freundlich和Langmuir等温线方程拟合实验数据,模拟吸附行为。确定了达到≥95%吸附所需的药物特异性活性炭-药物比。结果:活性炭对5种药物的吸附均有效,但吸附效率随ph值的变化而变化。模拟肠液对5种药物的最大吸附量均高于模拟胃液。在模拟肠液中,当活性炭与药物的比例为10:1时,安非他酮的吸附性≥95%,而在模拟胃液中,当活性炭与药物的比例为12:1时,也没有达到这一水平。阿米替林和心得安的吸附比低于10:1时达到≥95%。文拉法辛和米诺地尔需要较高的活性炭比例才能达到最大的吸附。活性炭在模拟肠液中具有较高的药物结合能力,但在模拟胃液中的结合能力较强。安非他酮在模拟肠液中的吸附总体上更多,但浓度越高,吸附效率越低。讨论:对于临床上明显过量的安非他酮、米诺地尔和文拉法辛,特别是对于胃吸附可能很重要的立即释放安非他酮,单次50g活性炭以10:1的比例可能是不够的。结论:本研究支持在阿米替林、安非他酮、米诺地尔、普萘洛尔和文拉法辛过量服用时使用活性炭进行胃肠道净化。然而,吸附行为的药物特异性差异表明需要改进给药策略,特别是在涉及结合效率较低的药物的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adsorption of antidepressant and cardiovascular drugs to activated charcoal: amitriptyline, bupropion, minoxidil, propranolol, and venlafaxine.

Background: Overdoses involving antidepressant and cardiovascular drugs account for 21.9% of non-opioid overdose-related fatalities in the United States. Activated charcoal is commonly used for gastrointestinal decontamination, but data regarding its adsorption efficacy for several clinically relevant drugs remain limited.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the adsorption of amitriptyline, bupropion, minoxidil, propranolol, and venlafaxine to activated charcoal by fitting adsorption isotherm data.

Methods: Kinetics and adsorption isotherm experiments were conducted using simulated gastric fluid (pH 1.2) and simulated intestinal fluid (pH 6.8). Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm equations were fitted to experimental data to model adsorption behavior. Drug-specific activated charcoal-to-drug ratios required to achieve ≥95% adsorption were identified.

Results: All five drugs were adsorbed effectively to activated charcoal although adsorption efficiencies varied by pH. Maximal adsorption capacities of all drugs were higher in simulated intestinal fluid compared to simulated gastric fluid. In simulated intestinal fluid, ≥95% of bupropion was adsorbed at a 10:1 activated charcoal-to-drug ratio, while this level was not reached in simulated gastric fluid even at a 12:1 ratio. Amitriptyline and propranolol reached ≥95% adsorption at ratios below 10:1. Venlafaxine and minoxidil required higher ratios of activated charcoal ratios to reach maximal adsorption. Activated charcoal had a higher drug-binding capacity in simulated intestinal fluid, but binding was stronger in simulated gastric fluid. Bupropion was adsorbed more in simulated intestinal fluid overall, though efficiency decreased at higher concentrations.

Discussion: A single 50 g dose of activated charcoal at 10:1 ratio may be inadequate for clinically significant overdoses of bupropion, minoxidil, and venlafaxine, especially for immediate release bupropion for which gastric adsorption may be important.

Conclusions: This study supports the use of activated charcoal for gastrointestinal decontamination in overdoses involving amitriptyline, bupropion, minoxidil, propranolol, and venlafaxine. However, drug-specific differences in adsorption behavior suggest a need for refined dosing strategies, particularly in cases involving drugs with lower binding efficiencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信