布比卡因和利多卡因-布比卡因混合物治疗臂丛神经阻滞的比较疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.2
Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI:10.17085/apm.25264
João M Cansian, Vítor S Bracht, Lisandra V Biolo, André P Schmidt
{"title":"布比卡因和利多卡因-布比卡因混合物治疗臂丛神经阻滞的比较疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"João M Cansian, Vítor S Bracht, Lisandra V Biolo, André P Schmidt","doi":"10.17085/apm.25264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combining lidocaine with bupivacaine in brachial plexus blocks seeks to blend rapid onset with extended duration; yet, clinical advantages are uncertain. This systematic review assesses their efficacy against bupivacaine alone in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted in May 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing lidocaine-bupivacaine mixtures with bupivacaine alone in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks were included. The primary outcome was sensory block onset time. Secondary outcomes included motor block onset time, sensory and motor block durations, and conversion to general anesthesia. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed via I² statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,490 identified articles, 7 RCTs (358 patients) met the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was found in sensory block onset time (mean difference [MD] -1.81 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.92 to 0.29; P = 0.09; I² = 98%) or motor block onset time (MD 0.02 min, 95% CI -2.34 to 2.39; P = 0.99; I² = 95%) between groups. The mixture reduced sensory (MD -172.88 min, 95% CI -215.18 to -130.59; P<0.00001; I² = 90%) and motor block durations (MD -212.13 min, 95% CI -374.99 to -49.28; P = 0.01; I² = 93%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No clinical benefit was observed from combining lidocaine with bupivacaine, as there was no improvement in block onset times and a reduction in block durations. Given the very low certainty of evidence, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further high-quality RCTs are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"20 3","pages":"252-265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of bupivacaine and lidocaine-bupivacaine mixtures in brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"João M Cansian, Vítor S Bracht, Lisandra V Biolo, André P Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.17085/apm.25264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combining lidocaine with bupivacaine in brachial plexus blocks seeks to blend rapid onset with extended duration; yet, clinical advantages are uncertain. This systematic review assesses their efficacy against bupivacaine alone in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted in May 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing lidocaine-bupivacaine mixtures with bupivacaine alone in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks were included. The primary outcome was sensory block onset time. Secondary outcomes included motor block onset time, sensory and motor block durations, and conversion to general anesthesia. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed via I² statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,490 identified articles, 7 RCTs (358 patients) met the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was found in sensory block onset time (mean difference [MD] -1.81 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.92 to 0.29; P = 0.09; I² = 98%) or motor block onset time (MD 0.02 min, 95% CI -2.34 to 2.39; P = 0.99; I² = 95%) between groups. The mixture reduced sensory (MD -172.88 min, 95% CI -215.18 to -130.59; P<0.00001; I² = 90%) and motor block durations (MD -212.13 min, 95% CI -374.99 to -49.28; P = 0.01; I² = 93%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No clinical benefit was observed from combining lidocaine with bupivacaine, as there was no improvement in block onset times and a reduction in block durations. Given the very low certainty of evidence, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further high-quality RCTs are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"252-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340692/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.25264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.25264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:利多卡因联合布比卡因治疗臂丛神经阻滞寻求快速起效与延长持续时间相结合;然而,临床优势尚不确定。本系统综述评估了超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞中它们单独对抗布比卡因的疗效。方法:于2025年5月系统检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库。随机对照试验(rct)比较利多卡因-布比卡因混合物和单独布比卡因在超声引导下的臂丛阻滞。主要观察指标为感觉阻滞发作时间。次要结局包括运动阻滞发生时间、感觉和运动阻滞持续时间以及转到全身麻醉。采用随机效应模型分析数据,通过I²统计量评估异质性。结果:在1490篇文献中,有7篇rct(358例患者)符合纳入标准。感觉阻滞发作时间无显著差异(平均差[MD] -1.81 min, 95%可信区间[CI] -3.92 ~ 0.29;P = 0.09;I²= 98%)或运动阻滞发作时间(MD 0.02 min, 95% CI -2.34 ~ 2.39;P = 0.99;I²= 95%)。混合物降低感官(MD -172.88 min, 95% CI -215.18 ~ -130.59;结论:利多卡因联合布比卡因没有观察到临床益处,因为没有改善阻滞发作时间和减少阻滞持续时间。鉴于证据的确定性非常低,这些发现应谨慎解释,并需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative effectiveness of bupivacaine and lidocaine-bupivacaine mixtures in brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Combining lidocaine with bupivacaine in brachial plexus blocks seeks to blend rapid onset with extended duration; yet, clinical advantages are uncertain. This systematic review assesses their efficacy against bupivacaine alone in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted in May 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing lidocaine-bupivacaine mixtures with bupivacaine alone in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks were included. The primary outcome was sensory block onset time. Secondary outcomes included motor block onset time, sensory and motor block durations, and conversion to general anesthesia. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed via I² statistics.

Results: Of 1,490 identified articles, 7 RCTs (358 patients) met the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was found in sensory block onset time (mean difference [MD] -1.81 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.92 to 0.29; P = 0.09; I² = 98%) or motor block onset time (MD 0.02 min, 95% CI -2.34 to 2.39; P = 0.99; I² = 95%) between groups. The mixture reduced sensory (MD -172.88 min, 95% CI -215.18 to -130.59; P<0.00001; I² = 90%) and motor block durations (MD -212.13 min, 95% CI -374.99 to -49.28; P = 0.01; I² = 93%).

Conclusions: No clinical benefit was observed from combining lidocaine with bupivacaine, as there was no improvement in block onset times and a reduction in block durations. Given the very low certainty of evidence, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further high-quality RCTs are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信