健康不平等的政治经济学。

IF 2.6 0 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gary Lowery
{"title":"健康不平等的政治经济学。","authors":"Gary Lowery","doi":"10.1177/27551938251365072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How are health inequalities shaped by a country's political economy? In answering this question this article takes as its point of analytical departure health inequalities in England that are persistent, entrenched, and, by some metrics, increasing. Political economy in the English context is understood as broad commitment to neoliberalism as a governing paradigm. Partial answers to this question have already been provided through analyses of neoliberalism broadly conceived, as well as the impact of its key policy tenets (privatization, liberalization, and deregulation) on access to health and health care. The key contribution of this article, however, is to take a step back to consider the contributory role of the broader philosophical underpinnings of neoliberalism, thereby providing fresh insights into the manner in which the appropriate role of government, individualism, and inequality shape government understandings of, and responses to, health inequalities. In doing, so the article contributes to a greater understanding of the frequently neglected structural, or \"upstream,\" determinants of health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73479,"journal":{"name":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","volume":" ","pages":"27551938251365072"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Political Economy of Health Inequality.\",\"authors\":\"Gary Lowery\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27551938251365072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>How are health inequalities shaped by a country's political economy? In answering this question this article takes as its point of analytical departure health inequalities in England that are persistent, entrenched, and, by some metrics, increasing. Political economy in the English context is understood as broad commitment to neoliberalism as a governing paradigm. Partial answers to this question have already been provided through analyses of neoliberalism broadly conceived, as well as the impact of its key policy tenets (privatization, liberalization, and deregulation) on access to health and health care. The key contribution of this article, however, is to take a step back to consider the contributory role of the broader philosophical underpinnings of neoliberalism, thereby providing fresh insights into the manner in which the appropriate role of government, individualism, and inequality shape government understandings of, and responses to, health inequalities. In doing, so the article contributes to a greater understanding of the frequently neglected structural, or \\\"upstream,\\\" determinants of health inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of social determinants of health and health services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"27551938251365072\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of social determinants of health and health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938251365072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938251365072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个国家的政治经济如何影响健康不平等?在回答这个问题时,本文的分析出发点是英格兰持续存在的、根深蒂固的健康不平等,从某些指标来看,这种不平等还在增加。在英语语境中,政治经济学被理解为对新自由主义作为治理范式的广泛承诺。这个问题的部分答案已经通过分析广义的新自由主义,以及其关键政策原则(私有化、自由化和放松管制)对获得健康和医疗保健的影响而得到了。然而,本文的关键贡献在于退一步考虑新自由主义更广泛的哲学基础的贡献作用,从而为政府、个人主义和不平等的适当作用如何影响政府对健康不平等的理解和反应提供了新的见解。因此,本文有助于更好地理解经常被忽视的结构性或“上游”卫生不平等的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Political Economy of Health Inequality.

How are health inequalities shaped by a country's political economy? In answering this question this article takes as its point of analytical departure health inequalities in England that are persistent, entrenched, and, by some metrics, increasing. Political economy in the English context is understood as broad commitment to neoliberalism as a governing paradigm. Partial answers to this question have already been provided through analyses of neoliberalism broadly conceived, as well as the impact of its key policy tenets (privatization, liberalization, and deregulation) on access to health and health care. The key contribution of this article, however, is to take a step back to consider the contributory role of the broader philosophical underpinnings of neoliberalism, thereby providing fresh insights into the manner in which the appropriate role of government, individualism, and inequality shape government understandings of, and responses to, health inequalities. In doing, so the article contributes to a greater understanding of the frequently neglected structural, or "upstream," determinants of health inequalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信