Samantha L Bernstein, Lisa-Marie O'Brien, Chrissie Connors
{"title":"产科护士使用变通方法的人为因素评价。","authors":"Samantha L Bernstein, Lisa-Marie O'Brien, Chrissie Connors","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and categorize components of the work system that obstetric nurses address using workarounds.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Convergent parallel mixed methods.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey distribution from September 7, 2024, to October 11, 2024, and virtual interviews from September 13, 2024, to November 20, 2024.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Registered nurses (N = 168) who worked in antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum settings who completed an online survey and a subset (n = 30) who participated in semistructured interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data for the quantitative arm using the Nursing Workarounds Instrument and categorized the results according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model using descriptive statistics. For the qualitative arm, we used semistructured interviews to obtain a more in-depth understanding of the use of workarounds. We securely recorded, transcribed, checked for accuracy, and coded interviews using content analysis and the SEIPS components as a deductive framework. We used Dedoose software for data analysis and developed a joint display to facilitate data integration and interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workarounds were most frequently related to the technology and tools component of the SEIPS model, and most participants (n = 133, 79.2%) reported that problems with technology interfered with their work. Participants described the need to \"override\" emergency medication systems through workarounds in the electronic medical record and at medication dispensing cabinets. However, nearly all participants reported a preference for following procedures when possible (n = 163, 97.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants innovated and implemented workarounds as adaptive responses to operational failures. Quality improvement efforts to improve the work system could reduce the need for workarounds during patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Factors Evaluation of the Use of Workarounds Among Obstetric Nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha L Bernstein, Lisa-Marie O'Brien, Chrissie Connors\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogn.2025.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and categorize components of the work system that obstetric nurses address using workarounds.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Convergent parallel mixed methods.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey distribution from September 7, 2024, to October 11, 2024, and virtual interviews from September 13, 2024, to November 20, 2024.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Registered nurses (N = 168) who worked in antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum settings who completed an online survey and a subset (n = 30) who participated in semistructured interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data for the quantitative arm using the Nursing Workarounds Instrument and categorized the results according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model using descriptive statistics. For the qualitative arm, we used semistructured interviews to obtain a more in-depth understanding of the use of workarounds. We securely recorded, transcribed, checked for accuracy, and coded interviews using content analysis and the SEIPS components as a deductive framework. We used Dedoose software for data analysis and developed a joint display to facilitate data integration and interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workarounds were most frequently related to the technology and tools component of the SEIPS model, and most participants (n = 133, 79.2%) reported that problems with technology interfered with their work. Participants described the need to \\\"override\\\" emergency medication systems through workarounds in the electronic medical record and at medication dispensing cabinets. However, nearly all participants reported a preference for following procedures when possible (n = 163, 97.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants innovated and implemented workarounds as adaptive responses to operational failures. Quality improvement efforts to improve the work system could reduce the need for workarounds during patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2025.07.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2025.07.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Human Factors Evaluation of the Use of Workarounds Among Obstetric Nurses.
Objective: To identify and categorize components of the work system that obstetric nurses address using workarounds.
Design: Convergent parallel mixed methods.
Setting: Online survey distribution from September 7, 2024, to October 11, 2024, and virtual interviews from September 13, 2024, to November 20, 2024.
Participants: Registered nurses (N = 168) who worked in antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum settings who completed an online survey and a subset (n = 30) who participated in semistructured interviews.
Methods: We collected data for the quantitative arm using the Nursing Workarounds Instrument and categorized the results according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model using descriptive statistics. For the qualitative arm, we used semistructured interviews to obtain a more in-depth understanding of the use of workarounds. We securely recorded, transcribed, checked for accuracy, and coded interviews using content analysis and the SEIPS components as a deductive framework. We used Dedoose software for data analysis and developed a joint display to facilitate data integration and interpretation.
Results: Workarounds were most frequently related to the technology and tools component of the SEIPS model, and most participants (n = 133, 79.2%) reported that problems with technology interfered with their work. Participants described the need to "override" emergency medication systems through workarounds in the electronic medical record and at medication dispensing cabinets. However, nearly all participants reported a preference for following procedures when possible (n = 163, 97.0%).
Conclusion: Participants innovated and implemented workarounds as adaptive responses to operational failures. Quality improvement efforts to improve the work system could reduce the need for workarounds during patient care.
期刊介绍:
JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.