产科护士使用变通方法的人为因素评价。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Samantha L Bernstein, Lisa-Marie O'Brien, Chrissie Connors
{"title":"产科护士使用变通方法的人为因素评价。","authors":"Samantha L Bernstein, Lisa-Marie O'Brien, Chrissie Connors","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and categorize components of the work system that obstetric nurses address using workarounds.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Convergent parallel mixed methods.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey distribution from September 7, 2024, to October 11, 2024, and virtual interviews from September 13, 2024, to November 20, 2024.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Registered nurses (N = 168) who worked in antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum settings who completed an online survey and a subset (n = 30) who participated in semistructured interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data for the quantitative arm using the Nursing Workarounds Instrument and categorized the results according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model using descriptive statistics. For the qualitative arm, we used semistructured interviews to obtain a more in-depth understanding of the use of workarounds. We securely recorded, transcribed, checked for accuracy, and coded interviews using content analysis and the SEIPS components as a deductive framework. We used Dedoose software for data analysis and developed a joint display to facilitate data integration and interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workarounds were most frequently related to the technology and tools component of the SEIPS model, and most participants (n = 133, 79.2%) reported that problems with technology interfered with their work. Participants described the need to \"override\" emergency medication systems through workarounds in the electronic medical record and at medication dispensing cabinets. However, nearly all participants reported a preference for following procedures when possible (n = 163, 97.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants innovated and implemented workarounds as adaptive responses to operational failures. Quality improvement efforts to improve the work system could reduce the need for workarounds during patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Factors Evaluation of the Use of Workarounds Among Obstetric Nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha L Bernstein, Lisa-Marie O'Brien, Chrissie Connors\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogn.2025.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and categorize components of the work system that obstetric nurses address using workarounds.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Convergent parallel mixed methods.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey distribution from September 7, 2024, to October 11, 2024, and virtual interviews from September 13, 2024, to November 20, 2024.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Registered nurses (N = 168) who worked in antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum settings who completed an online survey and a subset (n = 30) who participated in semistructured interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data for the quantitative arm using the Nursing Workarounds Instrument and categorized the results according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model using descriptive statistics. For the qualitative arm, we used semistructured interviews to obtain a more in-depth understanding of the use of workarounds. We securely recorded, transcribed, checked for accuracy, and coded interviews using content analysis and the SEIPS components as a deductive framework. We used Dedoose software for data analysis and developed a joint display to facilitate data integration and interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workarounds were most frequently related to the technology and tools component of the SEIPS model, and most participants (n = 133, 79.2%) reported that problems with technology interfered with their work. Participants described the need to \\\"override\\\" emergency medication systems through workarounds in the electronic medical record and at medication dispensing cabinets. However, nearly all participants reported a preference for following procedures when possible (n = 163, 97.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants innovated and implemented workarounds as adaptive responses to operational failures. Quality improvement efforts to improve the work system could reduce the need for workarounds during patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2025.07.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2025.07.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:识别和分类产科护士使用变通办法解决的工作系统的组成部分。设计:收敛并行混合方法。设置:2024年9月7日至2024年10月11日进行在线调查分发,2024年9月13日至2024年11月20日进行虚拟访谈。参与者:完成在线调查的产前、产时和产后工作的注册护士(N = 168)和参加半结构化访谈的子集(N = 30)。方法:采用收敛混合方法进行研究。我们使用护理工作环境工具收集定量组的数据,并使用描述性统计根据患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS)模型对结果进行分类。在定性方面,我们使用半结构化访谈来更深入地了解变通方法的使用。我们安全地记录、转录、检查准确性,并使用内容分析和SEIPS组件作为演绎框架对访谈进行编码。我们使用Dedoose软件进行数据分析,并开发了一个联合显示器,以方便数据集成和解释。结果:变通方法最常与SEIPS模型的技术和工具组件相关,大多数参与者(n = 133, 79.2%)报告说技术问题干扰了他们的工作。与会者描述了通过电子病历和药物配药柜的变通办法“推翻”紧急药物系统的必要性。然而,几乎所有的参与者都表示在可能的情况下更倾向于遵循程序(n = 163, 97.0%)。结论:参与者创新并实施了变通方法,作为对操作失败的适应性响应。改善工作系统的质量改进工作可以减少患者护理期间对变通方法的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Factors Evaluation of the Use of Workarounds Among Obstetric Nurses.

Objective: To identify and categorize components of the work system that obstetric nurses address using workarounds.

Design: Convergent parallel mixed methods.

Setting: Online survey distribution from September 7, 2024, to October 11, 2024, and virtual interviews from September 13, 2024, to November 20, 2024.

Participants: Registered nurses (N = 168) who worked in antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum settings who completed an online survey and a subset (n = 30) who participated in semistructured interviews.

Methods: We collected data for the quantitative arm using the Nursing Workarounds Instrument and categorized the results according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model using descriptive statistics. For the qualitative arm, we used semistructured interviews to obtain a more in-depth understanding of the use of workarounds. We securely recorded, transcribed, checked for accuracy, and coded interviews using content analysis and the SEIPS components as a deductive framework. We used Dedoose software for data analysis and developed a joint display to facilitate data integration and interpretation.

Results: Workarounds were most frequently related to the technology and tools component of the SEIPS model, and most participants (n = 133, 79.2%) reported that problems with technology interfered with their work. Participants described the need to "override" emergency medication systems through workarounds in the electronic medical record and at medication dispensing cabinets. However, nearly all participants reported a preference for following procedures when possible (n = 163, 97.0%).

Conclusion: Participants innovated and implemented workarounds as adaptive responses to operational failures. Quality improvement efforts to improve the work system could reduce the need for workarounds during patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信