动脉粥样硬化性心血管风险计算的优势和劣势:一项定性研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ebiere Okah, Oluwamuyiwa Adeniran, Paul Mihas, Philip D Sloane
{"title":"动脉粥样硬化性心血管风险计算的优势和劣势:一项定性研究。","authors":"Ebiere Okah, Oluwamuyiwa Adeniran, Paul Mihas, Philip D Sloane","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240324R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) have low statin use. Clinician perceptions of the ASCVD risk estimates that guide statin prescribing may contribute to poor uptake. At the time of the study, the only equations used to predict ASCVD risk (the Pooled Cohort Equations; PCE) provided race-specific estimates, a controversial practice and a potential reason why clinicians may scrutinize these estimates. We sought to examine how clinicians perceived ASCVD estimates, in relation to their perceptions of race and, also, more broadly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an interpretive description study using ten 45-minute semistructured interviews with primary care physicians in North Carolina between March and April 2022. Interviews focused on the PCE ASCVD risk calculator and perspectives of race as it relates to ASCVD. Responses were analyzed using both deductive and inductive approaches to identify primary topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5 men and 5 women participated. Of these, 6 identified as White, 2 as Black, and 2 as Asian. Three main topics emerged. First, participants felt conflicted about the role of race in ASCVD risk. Second, they had several concerns with the calculator that went beyond race, including its emphasis on statin use and lack of social determinants of health. Finally, participants universally valued the PCE ASCVD calculator as a tool to educate patients and inspire statin initiation and behavioral change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PCE ASCVD risk calculator was seen as most useful in facilitating discussions regarding behavior and lifestyle changes, suggesting the potential benefit of incorporating variables related to patients' health behaviors in a revised model. The new PREVENT equations provide a helpful first step by removing race and including social determinants. The next step may be to add health behaviors and visual images to facilitate patient counseling and comprehension.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"464-474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengths and Weakness of the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Calculation: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ebiere Okah, Oluwamuyiwa Adeniran, Paul Mihas, Philip D Sloane\",\"doi\":\"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240324R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) have low statin use. Clinician perceptions of the ASCVD risk estimates that guide statin prescribing may contribute to poor uptake. At the time of the study, the only equations used to predict ASCVD risk (the Pooled Cohort Equations; PCE) provided race-specific estimates, a controversial practice and a potential reason why clinicians may scrutinize these estimates. We sought to examine how clinicians perceived ASCVD estimates, in relation to their perceptions of race and, also, more broadly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an interpretive description study using ten 45-minute semistructured interviews with primary care physicians in North Carolina between March and April 2022. Interviews focused on the PCE ASCVD risk calculator and perspectives of race as it relates to ASCVD. Responses were analyzed using both deductive and inductive approaches to identify primary topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5 men and 5 women participated. Of these, 6 identified as White, 2 as Black, and 2 as Asian. Three main topics emerged. First, participants felt conflicted about the role of race in ASCVD risk. Second, they had several concerns with the calculator that went beyond race, including its emphasis on statin use and lack of social determinants of health. Finally, participants universally valued the PCE ASCVD calculator as a tool to educate patients and inspire statin initiation and behavioral change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PCE ASCVD risk calculator was seen as most useful in facilitating discussions regarding behavior and lifestyle changes, suggesting the potential benefit of incorporating variables related to patients' health behaviors in a revised model. The new PREVENT equations provide a helpful first step by removing race and including social determinants. The next step may be to add health behaviors and visual images to facilitate patient counseling and comprehension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"464-474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240324R1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240324R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险的患者他汀类药物的使用率较低。临床医生对ASCVD风险估计的认识,指导他汀类药物处方可能导致摄取不良。在研究期间,唯一用于预测ASCVD风险的方程(合并队列方程;PCE)提供了种族特异性的估计,这是一个有争议的做法,也是临床医生可能会仔细审查这些估计的潜在原因。我们试图研究临床医生如何看待ASCVD的估计,与他们对种族的看法以及更广泛的看法有关。方法:我们在2022年3月至4月期间对北卡罗来纳州的初级保健医生进行了10次45分钟的半结构化访谈,进行了一项解释性描述研究。访谈的重点是PCE ASCVD风险计算器和与ASCVD相关的种族观点。使用演绎和归纳方法来分析回答,以确定主要主题。结果:男性5人,女性5人。其中6人是白人,2人是黑人,2人是亚洲人。出现了三个主要议题。首先,参与者对种族在ASCVD风险中的作用感到矛盾。其次,他们对这个计算器有一些超越种族的担忧,包括它强调他汀类药物的使用,以及缺乏健康的社会决定因素。最后,参与者普遍认为PCE ASCVD计算器是教育患者和激励他汀类药物起始和行为改变的工具。结论:PCE ASCVD风险计算器在促进有关行为和生活方式改变的讨论中被认为是最有用的,这表明在修订后的模型中纳入与患者健康行为相关的变量可能会带来好处。新的PREVENT方程通过消除种族和包括社会决定因素提供了有益的第一步。下一步可能是添加健康行为和视觉图像,以促进患者的咨询和理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strengths and Weakness of the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Calculation: A Qualitative Study.

Background: Patients at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) have low statin use. Clinician perceptions of the ASCVD risk estimates that guide statin prescribing may contribute to poor uptake. At the time of the study, the only equations used to predict ASCVD risk (the Pooled Cohort Equations; PCE) provided race-specific estimates, a controversial practice and a potential reason why clinicians may scrutinize these estimates. We sought to examine how clinicians perceived ASCVD estimates, in relation to their perceptions of race and, also, more broadly.

Methods: We conducted an interpretive description study using ten 45-minute semistructured interviews with primary care physicians in North Carolina between March and April 2022. Interviews focused on the PCE ASCVD risk calculator and perspectives of race as it relates to ASCVD. Responses were analyzed using both deductive and inductive approaches to identify primary topics.

Results: 5 men and 5 women participated. Of these, 6 identified as White, 2 as Black, and 2 as Asian. Three main topics emerged. First, participants felt conflicted about the role of race in ASCVD risk. Second, they had several concerns with the calculator that went beyond race, including its emphasis on statin use and lack of social determinants of health. Finally, participants universally valued the PCE ASCVD calculator as a tool to educate patients and inspire statin initiation and behavioral change.

Conclusions: The PCE ASCVD risk calculator was seen as most useful in facilitating discussions regarding behavior and lifestyle changes, suggesting the potential benefit of incorporating variables related to patients' health behaviors in a revised model. The new PREVENT equations provide a helpful first step by removing race and including social determinants. The next step may be to add health behaviors and visual images to facilitate patient counseling and comprehension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信