认知障碍与结肠镜检查前肠道准备不足有关吗?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jeanette M Daly, Yinghui Xu, Seth D Crockett, Richard M Hoffman, Barcey T Levy
{"title":"认知障碍与结肠镜检查前肠道准备不足有关吗?","authors":"Jeanette M Daly, Yinghui Xu, Seth D Crockett, Richard M Hoffman, Barcey T Levy","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240338R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) for colonoscopies is associated with missed polyps and cancers, prolonged procedure times, lower colonoscopy completion rates, and need for a repeat procedure. The purposes of this study were to assess: 1) whether impaired cognitive status (measured by an abnormal clock drawing test) was associated with IBP, and 2) the association of participant demographic and clinical characteristics with IBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional cohort study conducted in 3 academic centers. Subjects, 50 to 85 years old, completed 5 stool tests on a single sample and a clock drawing before undergoing a screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Clock drawings were validated by the Mendes-Santos method and Watson method. A generalized linear mixed model was conducted to estimate factors associated with IBP, based on Aronchick bowel preparation score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2,016 participants had a mean age of 63 years (SD = 7.95); 1,274 (63%) were female; 119 (6%) had IBP; and 421 (21%) had an abnormal clock drawing. After controlling for age in the multivariable model, the odds of having an IBP versus adequate were 1.44 (95% CI, 0.94-2.22) for those with an abnormal clock drawing score compared with those with a normal score. The only variable significantly associated with IBP was household income, with an odds of 2.48 (95% CI, 1.56-3.95) for household income of <$40,000 compared with income >$80,000.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lower household income was associated with greater odds of IBP. The association between an abnormal clock drawing score and IBP was not statistically significant.NCT03264898 (clinicaltrials.gov) - Comparative Effectiveness of FITs with Colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"423-430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Cognitive Impairment Associated with Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy?\",\"authors\":\"Jeanette M Daly, Yinghui Xu, Seth D Crockett, Richard M Hoffman, Barcey T Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240338R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) for colonoscopies is associated with missed polyps and cancers, prolonged procedure times, lower colonoscopy completion rates, and need for a repeat procedure. The purposes of this study were to assess: 1) whether impaired cognitive status (measured by an abnormal clock drawing test) was associated with IBP, and 2) the association of participant demographic and clinical characteristics with IBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional cohort study conducted in 3 academic centers. Subjects, 50 to 85 years old, completed 5 stool tests on a single sample and a clock drawing before undergoing a screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Clock drawings were validated by the Mendes-Santos method and Watson method. A generalized linear mixed model was conducted to estimate factors associated with IBP, based on Aronchick bowel preparation score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2,016 participants had a mean age of 63 years (SD = 7.95); 1,274 (63%) were female; 119 (6%) had IBP; and 421 (21%) had an abnormal clock drawing. After controlling for age in the multivariable model, the odds of having an IBP versus adequate were 1.44 (95% CI, 0.94-2.22) for those with an abnormal clock drawing score compared with those with a normal score. The only variable significantly associated with IBP was household income, with an odds of 2.48 (95% CI, 1.56-3.95) for household income of <$40,000 compared with income >$80,000.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lower household income was associated with greater odds of IBP. The association between an abnormal clock drawing score and IBP was not statistically significant.NCT03264898 (clinicaltrials.gov) - Comparative Effectiveness of FITs with Colonoscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"423-430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240338R1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240338R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:结肠镜检查的肠准备不充分(IBP)与息肉和癌症漏诊、手术时间延长、结肠镜检查完成率降低以及需要重复手术有关。本研究的目的是评估:1)认知状态受损(通过异常时钟绘制测试测量)是否与IBP相关;2)参与者的人口学和临床特征与IBP的关系。方法:在3个学术中心进行横断面队列研究。受试者年龄在50至85岁之间,在进行筛查或监视结肠镜检查之前,对单个样本完成了5次粪便检查和一次时钟绘图。时钟图通过Mendes-Santos方法和Watson方法进行验证。基于Aronchick肠准备评分,采用广义线性混合模型估计IBP相关因素。结果:2016名参与者平均年龄为63岁(SD = 7.95);女性1274例(63%);119例(6%)有IBP;时钟绘制异常421例(21%)。在多变量模型中控制年龄后,时钟绘制评分异常的患者与正常评分的患者相比,IBP与适当的几率为1.44 (95% CI, 0.94-2.22)。唯一与IBP显著相关的变量是家庭收入,家庭收入为8万美元的赔率为2.48 (95% CI, 1.56-3.95)。结论:较低的家庭收入与较高的IBP发生率相关。异常时钟绘制评分与IBP之间的相关性无统计学意义。NCT03264898 (clinicaltrials.gov) - FITs与结肠镜检查的比较有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Cognitive Impairment Associated with Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy?

Purpose: Inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) for colonoscopies is associated with missed polyps and cancers, prolonged procedure times, lower colonoscopy completion rates, and need for a repeat procedure. The purposes of this study were to assess: 1) whether impaired cognitive status (measured by an abnormal clock drawing test) was associated with IBP, and 2) the association of participant demographic and clinical characteristics with IBP.

Methods: Cross-sectional cohort study conducted in 3 academic centers. Subjects, 50 to 85 years old, completed 5 stool tests on a single sample and a clock drawing before undergoing a screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Clock drawings were validated by the Mendes-Santos method and Watson method. A generalized linear mixed model was conducted to estimate factors associated with IBP, based on Aronchick bowel preparation score.

Results: The 2,016 participants had a mean age of 63 years (SD = 7.95); 1,274 (63%) were female; 119 (6%) had IBP; and 421 (21%) had an abnormal clock drawing. After controlling for age in the multivariable model, the odds of having an IBP versus adequate were 1.44 (95% CI, 0.94-2.22) for those with an abnormal clock drawing score compared with those with a normal score. The only variable significantly associated with IBP was household income, with an odds of 2.48 (95% CI, 1.56-3.95) for household income of <$40,000 compared with income >$80,000.

Conclusions: Lower household income was associated with greater odds of IBP. The association between an abnormal clock drawing score and IBP was not statistically significant.NCT03264898 (clinicaltrials.gov) - Comparative Effectiveness of FITs with Colonoscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信