当考虑初级保健实践与团队护理的混合护理交付模式时,平衡获取、福祉和协作。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tamar Wyte-Lake, Deborah J Cohen, Shannon Williams, Steffani R Bailey
{"title":"当考虑初级保健实践与团队护理的混合护理交付模式时,平衡获取、福祉和协作。","authors":"Tamar Wyte-Lake, Deborah J Cohen, Shannon Williams, Steffani R Bailey","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240388R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hybrid models of care (ie, telehealth and in-person care delivery options) have been incorporated into primary care clinics to increase patient access to care. We examine the effects of these approaches on the work experiences and wellness of primary care clinical team members providing team-based care to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews with clinical team members (primary care clinicians, behavioral health consultants, registered nurse) at 2 primary care practices at 2 time points (late 2021-mid 2022 (n = 14); midlate 2023 (n = 11)). We used an inductive approach to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Benefits of hybrid models of care included increased patient access and personal flexibility; however, it was noted that the fragmented in-clinic schedules that emerged from the hybrid model resulted in reduced in-clinic interactions. This led to less information sharing among team members and a degradation of informal support networks that could adversely impact patient care. To mitigate these challenges, many preferred that most of their clinical shifts occurred in-person, in the clinic, with 1 to 2 sessions per week for in-home (telework) shifts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In team-based primary care clinics, hybrid care models can impact interactions among clinical team members and shape the day-to-day environment in which clinical teams work. To optimize hybrid care approaches in the primary care setting, organization leaders must consider the impact of hybrid care models on clinic and team culture, and the well-being of clinical team members.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"475-489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Access, Well-Being, and Collaboration When Considering Hybrid Care Delivery Models in Primary Care Practices with Team-Based Care.\",\"authors\":\"Tamar Wyte-Lake, Deborah J Cohen, Shannon Williams, Steffani R Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240388R2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hybrid models of care (ie, telehealth and in-person care delivery options) have been incorporated into primary care clinics to increase patient access to care. We examine the effects of these approaches on the work experiences and wellness of primary care clinical team members providing team-based care to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews with clinical team members (primary care clinicians, behavioral health consultants, registered nurse) at 2 primary care practices at 2 time points (late 2021-mid 2022 (n = 14); midlate 2023 (n = 11)). We used an inductive approach to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Benefits of hybrid models of care included increased patient access and personal flexibility; however, it was noted that the fragmented in-clinic schedules that emerged from the hybrid model resulted in reduced in-clinic interactions. This led to less information sharing among team members and a degradation of informal support networks that could adversely impact patient care. To mitigate these challenges, many preferred that most of their clinical shifts occurred in-person, in the clinic, with 1 to 2 sessions per week for in-home (telework) shifts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In team-based primary care clinics, hybrid care models can impact interactions among clinical team members and shape the day-to-day environment in which clinical teams work. To optimize hybrid care approaches in the primary care setting, organization leaders must consider the impact of hybrid care models on clinic and team culture, and the well-being of clinical team members.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"475-489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240388R2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240388R2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:混合护理模式(即远程保健和亲自提供护理选择)已被纳入初级保健诊所,以增加患者获得护理的机会。我们研究了这些方法对初级保健临床团队成员的工作经验和健康的影响,为患者提供团队护理。方法:在本定性研究中,我们在2个时间点(2021年末- 2022年中(n = 14);2023年中期(n = 11))。我们用归纳的方法来分析数据。主要结果:混合护理模式的好处包括增加患者访问和个人灵活性;然而,值得注意的是,从混合模式中出现的分散的门诊时间表导致了门诊互动的减少。这导致团队成员之间的信息共享减少,非正式支持网络的退化可能对患者护理产生不利影响。为了减轻这些挑战,许多人倾向于他们的大部分临床轮班都是在诊所进行的,每周有1到2次的在家(远程工作)轮班。结论:在基于团队的初级保健诊所中,混合护理模式可以影响临床团队成员之间的互动,并塑造临床团队工作的日常环境。为了在初级保健环境中优化混合护理方法,组织领导者必须考虑混合护理模式对临床和团队文化的影响,以及临床团队成员的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing Access, Well-Being, and Collaboration When Considering Hybrid Care Delivery Models in Primary Care Practices with Team-Based Care.

Background: Hybrid models of care (ie, telehealth and in-person care delivery options) have been incorporated into primary care clinics to increase patient access to care. We examine the effects of these approaches on the work experiences and wellness of primary care clinical team members providing team-based care to patients.

Methods: In this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews with clinical team members (primary care clinicians, behavioral health consultants, registered nurse) at 2 primary care practices at 2 time points (late 2021-mid 2022 (n = 14); midlate 2023 (n = 11)). We used an inductive approach to analyze data.

Key results: Benefits of hybrid models of care included increased patient access and personal flexibility; however, it was noted that the fragmented in-clinic schedules that emerged from the hybrid model resulted in reduced in-clinic interactions. This led to less information sharing among team members and a degradation of informal support networks that could adversely impact patient care. To mitigate these challenges, many preferred that most of their clinical shifts occurred in-person, in the clinic, with 1 to 2 sessions per week for in-home (telework) shifts.

Conclusions: In team-based primary care clinics, hybrid care models can impact interactions among clinical team members and shape the day-to-day environment in which clinical teams work. To optimize hybrid care approaches in the primary care setting, organization leaders must consider the impact of hybrid care models on clinic and team culture, and the well-being of clinical team members.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信