非小细胞肺癌铂双药化疗和免疫治疗后二线和三线化疗的疗效:一项描述性研究

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2025-07-30 Epub Date: 2025-07-22 DOI:10.21037/tcr-2024-2555
Martin Svaton, Miloslav Marel, Ondrej Venclicek, Juraj Kultan, Marketa Cernovska, Michal Hrnciarik, Jana Krejci, Karel Odrazka, Petr Domecky
{"title":"非小细胞肺癌铂双药化疗和免疫治疗后二线和三线化疗的疗效:一项描述性研究","authors":"Martin Svaton, Miloslav Marel, Ondrej Venclicek, Juraj Kultan, Marketa Cernovska, Michal Hrnciarik, Jana Krejci, Karel Odrazka, Petr Domecky","doi":"10.21037/tcr-2024-2555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or docetaxel was evaluated in phase III clinical trials only after prior treatment with a platinum doublet in non-small cell lung cancer. The effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy after previous chemotherapy and immunotherapy is not well known. The effectiveness of third-line chemotherapy is not practically proven in this sense. The aim of this retrospective study was therefore to assess the effectiveness of second- and third-line chemotherapy in patients pretreated with chemotherapy with platinum doublet and immunotherapy based on retrospective data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from the Czech Lung Cancer Focus (LUCAS) lung cancer registry who were pretreated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy were evaluated. Time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS) with second- and third-line chemotherapy were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fourteen patients treated with second-line chemotherapy were evaluated. Their ToT reached a median of 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-4.7] months and OS a median of 7.2 (95% CI: 6.1-11.2) months. Twenty-two patients treated with third-line chemotherapy were evaluated. Their ToT reached a median of 5.1 (95% CI: 1.4-NA) months and OS a median of 13.8 (95% CI: 6.1-NA) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in our group of patients (pretreated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy) was comparable with registration studies for second-line chemotherapy. In a selected population, even third-line chemotherapy can be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"14 7","pages":"4348-4356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of second- and third-line chemotherapy after chemotherapy with platinum doublet and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a descriptive study.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Svaton, Miloslav Marel, Ondrej Venclicek, Juraj Kultan, Marketa Cernovska, Michal Hrnciarik, Jana Krejci, Karel Odrazka, Petr Domecky\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tcr-2024-2555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or docetaxel was evaluated in phase III clinical trials only after prior treatment with a platinum doublet in non-small cell lung cancer. The effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy after previous chemotherapy and immunotherapy is not well known. The effectiveness of third-line chemotherapy is not practically proven in this sense. The aim of this retrospective study was therefore to assess the effectiveness of second- and third-line chemotherapy in patients pretreated with chemotherapy with platinum doublet and immunotherapy based on retrospective data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from the Czech Lung Cancer Focus (LUCAS) lung cancer registry who were pretreated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy were evaluated. Time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS) with second- and third-line chemotherapy were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fourteen patients treated with second-line chemotherapy were evaluated. Their ToT reached a median of 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-4.7] months and OS a median of 7.2 (95% CI: 6.1-11.2) months. Twenty-two patients treated with third-line chemotherapy were evaluated. Their ToT reached a median of 5.1 (95% CI: 1.4-NA) months and OS a median of 13.8 (95% CI: 6.1-NA) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in our group of patients (pretreated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy) was comparable with registration studies for second-line chemotherapy. In a selected population, even third-line chemotherapy can be effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational cancer research\",\"volume\":\"14 7\",\"pages\":\"4348-4356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2024-2555\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2024-2555","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在III期临床试验中,非小细胞肺癌患者接受铂双药治疗后,二线化疗培美曲塞或多西他赛的疗效才得到评估。在既往化疗和免疫治疗后,二线化疗的有效性尚不清楚。在这个意义上,三线化疗的有效性并没有得到实际证明。因此,本回顾性研究的目的是根据回顾性数据评估经铂双药化疗和免疫治疗预处理的患者的二线和三线化疗的有效性。方法:对来自捷克肺癌中心(LUCAS)肺癌登记处的接受化疗和免疫治疗的患者进行评估。采用Kaplan-Meier法评估二、三线化疗的治疗时间(ToT)和总生存期(OS)。结果:114例患者接受了二线化疗。他们的ToT中位数为2.9[95%可信区间(CI): 2.4-4.7]个月,OS中位数为7.2 (95% CI: 6.1-11.2)个月。对22例接受三线化疗的患者进行评估。他们的ToT中位数为5.1 (95% CI: 1.4 na)个月,OS中位数为13.8 (95% CI: 6.1 na)个月。结论:本组患者的二线化疗(化疗和免疫治疗预处理)的疗效与二线化疗的注册研究相当。在选定的人群中,即使是三线化疗也可能有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of second- and third-line chemotherapy after chemotherapy with platinum doublet and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a descriptive study.

Background: The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or docetaxel was evaluated in phase III clinical trials only after prior treatment with a platinum doublet in non-small cell lung cancer. The effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy after previous chemotherapy and immunotherapy is not well known. The effectiveness of third-line chemotherapy is not practically proven in this sense. The aim of this retrospective study was therefore to assess the effectiveness of second- and third-line chemotherapy in patients pretreated with chemotherapy with platinum doublet and immunotherapy based on retrospective data.

Methods: Patients from the Czech Lung Cancer Focus (LUCAS) lung cancer registry who were pretreated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy were evaluated. Time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS) with second- and third-line chemotherapy were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: One hundred and fourteen patients treated with second-line chemotherapy were evaluated. Their ToT reached a median of 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-4.7] months and OS a median of 7.2 (95% CI: 6.1-11.2) months. Twenty-two patients treated with third-line chemotherapy were evaluated. Their ToT reached a median of 5.1 (95% CI: 1.4-NA) months and OS a median of 13.8 (95% CI: 6.1-NA) months.

Conclusions: The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in our group of patients (pretreated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy) was comparable with registration studies for second-line chemotherapy. In a selected population, even third-line chemotherapy can be effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信