Nancy L Dawson, Shannon S Coombs, Claire B Haga, Cara C Prier, Ashley L Walker, Colleen Thomas, Mingyuan Yin, Melinda S McManus, Leila M Tolaymat, Ebone Hill, Aneesah Garrett, Leah Schecter, Mary S Hedges
{"title":"家庭遥测患者再入院:一项随机对照试验的亚组分析","authors":"Nancy L Dawson, Shannon S Coombs, Claire B Haga, Cara C Prier, Ashley L Walker, Colleen Thomas, Mingyuan Yin, Melinda S McManus, Leila M Tolaymat, Ebone Hill, Aneesah Garrett, Leah Schecter, Mary S Hedges","doi":"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Home telemetry has been shown to reduce 30-day readmissions in patients at high risk for readmission. It remains unclear whether this finding is due to the telemetry itself or the nurse contact that follows detection of an abnormal parameter.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was a subgroup analysis from a prior trial comparing patients on home telemetry for 30 days to usual care after discharge to determine if nurse contact affected readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients randomized to telemetry who had at least 1 nurse contact were compared to those who had none to see if the contact reduced the rate of readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 449 home telemetry patients, 292 (65.0%) received 1 or more nurse contacts. Single and multivariable logistic regression models exploring the association of contact with 30-day readmission did not find any statistically significant associations of nurse contact with readmission (all unadjusted P ≥ .13, all adjusted P ≥ .18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our subset analysis did not show that the nurse contact was the factor that reduced readmission in patients on home telemetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":16931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing care quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital Readmissions in Patients on Home Telemetry: Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nancy L Dawson, Shannon S Coombs, Claire B Haga, Cara C Prier, Ashley L Walker, Colleen Thomas, Mingyuan Yin, Melinda S McManus, Leila M Tolaymat, Ebone Hill, Aneesah Garrett, Leah Schecter, Mary S Hedges\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Home telemetry has been shown to reduce 30-day readmissions in patients at high risk for readmission. It remains unclear whether this finding is due to the telemetry itself or the nurse contact that follows detection of an abnormal parameter.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was a subgroup analysis from a prior trial comparing patients on home telemetry for 30 days to usual care after discharge to determine if nurse contact affected readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients randomized to telemetry who had at least 1 nurse contact were compared to those who had none to see if the contact reduced the rate of readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 449 home telemetry patients, 292 (65.0%) received 1 or more nurse contacts. Single and multivariable logistic regression models exploring the association of contact with 30-day readmission did not find any statistically significant associations of nurse contact with readmission (all unadjusted P ≥ .13, all adjusted P ≥ .18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our subset analysis did not show that the nurse contact was the factor that reduced readmission in patients on home telemetry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing care quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing care quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000898\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing care quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hospital Readmissions in Patients on Home Telemetry: Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Background: Home telemetry has been shown to reduce 30-day readmissions in patients at high risk for readmission. It remains unclear whether this finding is due to the telemetry itself or the nurse contact that follows detection of an abnormal parameter.
Purpose: This study was a subgroup analysis from a prior trial comparing patients on home telemetry for 30 days to usual care after discharge to determine if nurse contact affected readmission rates.
Methods: Patients randomized to telemetry who had at least 1 nurse contact were compared to those who had none to see if the contact reduced the rate of readmissions.
Results: Of 449 home telemetry patients, 292 (65.0%) received 1 or more nurse contacts. Single and multivariable logistic regression models exploring the association of contact with 30-day readmission did not find any statistically significant associations of nurse contact with readmission (all unadjusted P ≥ .13, all adjusted P ≥ .18).
Conclusion: Our subset analysis did not show that the nurse contact was the factor that reduced readmission in patients on home telemetry.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.