抽样方法对物候指数的影响:来自印度各地的见解和建模。

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Journal of Biosciences Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Yadugiri V Tiruvaimozhi, Karthik Teegalapalli, Abinand Reddy, Akhil Murali, Aparajita Datta, Aparna Krishnan, Jayashree Ratnam, Mahesh Sankaran, Shasank Ongole, Srinivasan Kasinathan, T R Shankar Raman, Geetha Ramaswami
{"title":"抽样方法对物候指数的影响:来自印度各地的见解和建模。","authors":"Yadugiri V Tiruvaimozhi, Karthik Teegalapalli, Abinand Reddy, Akhil Murali, Aparajita Datta, Aparna Krishnan, Jayashree Ratnam, Mahesh Sankaran, Shasank Ongole, Srinivasan Kasinathan, T R Shankar Raman, Geetha Ramaswami","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant phenology is the study of the timing and extent of leaf, flower, and fruit production. Phenology data are used to study the drivers of cyclicity and seasonality of plant life-history stages, interactions with organisms such as pollinators, and effects of global change factors. Indices such as the timing of phenological events, and the proportion of individuals in a particular phenophase, seasonality, and synchrony have often been used to summarise plant phenology data. However, these indices have specific utilities and limitations and may be sensitive to sampling methodology, making cross-site comparisons challenging, particularly when data collection methods vary in terms of sample size, observation frequency, and the resolution at which phenophase intensity scores/values are recorded. We used fruiting phenology data from tropical trees across five sites in India to study the effects of sampling methodology on two indices: population-level synchrony (overlap) and seasonality. We supplemented these results with simulations of fast- and slow-changing phenologies to test for the effects of sampling methodology on these indices. We found that the overlap index is sensitive to the resolution of phenophase intensity measurement, with coarser intensity measures leading to overestimation of the overlap index. The seasonality index, on the other hand, was not affected by intensity resolution. Simulations indicated that finer intensity resolution is more important than frequency of observation to accurately estimate population synchrony and seasonality for fast- and slow-changing phenophases. Based on our findings, we provide recommendations for future study designs of tropical tree phenology research, particularly for long-term or cross-site studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosciences","volume":"50 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of sampling methodology on phenology indices: Insights from sites across India and modelling.\",\"authors\":\"Yadugiri V Tiruvaimozhi, Karthik Teegalapalli, Abinand Reddy, Akhil Murali, Aparajita Datta, Aparna Krishnan, Jayashree Ratnam, Mahesh Sankaran, Shasank Ongole, Srinivasan Kasinathan, T R Shankar Raman, Geetha Ramaswami\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Plant phenology is the study of the timing and extent of leaf, flower, and fruit production. Phenology data are used to study the drivers of cyclicity and seasonality of plant life-history stages, interactions with organisms such as pollinators, and effects of global change factors. Indices such as the timing of phenological events, and the proportion of individuals in a particular phenophase, seasonality, and synchrony have often been used to summarise plant phenology data. However, these indices have specific utilities and limitations and may be sensitive to sampling methodology, making cross-site comparisons challenging, particularly when data collection methods vary in terms of sample size, observation frequency, and the resolution at which phenophase intensity scores/values are recorded. We used fruiting phenology data from tropical trees across five sites in India to study the effects of sampling methodology on two indices: population-level synchrony (overlap) and seasonality. We supplemented these results with simulations of fast- and slow-changing phenologies to test for the effects of sampling methodology on these indices. We found that the overlap index is sensitive to the resolution of phenophase intensity measurement, with coarser intensity measures leading to overestimation of the overlap index. The seasonality index, on the other hand, was not affected by intensity resolution. Simulations indicated that finer intensity resolution is more important than frequency of observation to accurately estimate population synchrony and seasonality for fast- and slow-changing phenophases. Based on our findings, we provide recommendations for future study designs of tropical tree phenology research, particularly for long-term or cross-site studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物物候学是研究叶、花和果实产生的时间和程度的学科。物候数据用于研究植物生活史阶段的周期性和季节性驱动因素、与传粉者等生物的相互作用以及全球变化因子的影响。物候事件的时间、特定物候期的个体比例、季节性和同步性等指标经常被用来总结植物物候数据。然而,这些指数具有特定的效用和局限性,并且可能对采样方法敏感,使得跨站点比较具有挑战性,特别是当数据收集方法在样本量,观察频率和记录物候期强度评分/值的分辨率方面有所不同时。我们利用来自印度五个地点的热带树木的结果物候数据,研究了采样方法对种群水平同步性(重叠)和季节性这两个指标的影响。我们用快速和缓慢变化物候的模拟来补充这些结果,以测试抽样方法对这些指数的影响。我们发现重叠指数对物候强度测量的分辨率很敏感,较粗的强度测量会导致重叠指数的高估。另一方面,季节性指数不受强度分辨率的影响。模拟结果表明,对于快速和缓慢变化的物候期,更精细的强度分辨率比观测频率更重要。基于我们的研究结果,我们对热带树木物候研究的未来研究设计,特别是长期或跨站点的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of sampling methodology on phenology indices: Insights from sites across India and modelling.

Plant phenology is the study of the timing and extent of leaf, flower, and fruit production. Phenology data are used to study the drivers of cyclicity and seasonality of plant life-history stages, interactions with organisms such as pollinators, and effects of global change factors. Indices such as the timing of phenological events, and the proportion of individuals in a particular phenophase, seasonality, and synchrony have often been used to summarise plant phenology data. However, these indices have specific utilities and limitations and may be sensitive to sampling methodology, making cross-site comparisons challenging, particularly when data collection methods vary in terms of sample size, observation frequency, and the resolution at which phenophase intensity scores/values are recorded. We used fruiting phenology data from tropical trees across five sites in India to study the effects of sampling methodology on two indices: population-level synchrony (overlap) and seasonality. We supplemented these results with simulations of fast- and slow-changing phenologies to test for the effects of sampling methodology on these indices. We found that the overlap index is sensitive to the resolution of phenophase intensity measurement, with coarser intensity measures leading to overestimation of the overlap index. The seasonality index, on the other hand, was not affected by intensity resolution. Simulations indicated that finer intensity resolution is more important than frequency of observation to accurately estimate population synchrony and seasonality for fast- and slow-changing phenophases. Based on our findings, we provide recommendations for future study designs of tropical tree phenology research, particularly for long-term or cross-site studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biosciences
Journal of Biosciences 生物-生物学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biosciences is a quarterly journal published by the Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore. It covers all areas of Biology and is the premier journal in the country within its scope. It is indexed in Current Contents and other standard Biological and Medical databases. The Journal of Biosciences began in 1934 as the Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (Section B). This continued until 1978 when it was split into three parts : Proceedings-Animal Sciences, Proceedings-Plant Sciences and Proceedings-Experimental Biology. Proceedings-Experimental Biology was renamed Journal of Biosciences in 1979; and in 1991, Proceedings-Animal Sciences and Proceedings-Plant Sciences merged with it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信