父母的沟通和监控是否能抑制青少年的物质使用?二元研究的范围综述。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Anna Joy Russ, Anna Bullo, Peter J Schulz
{"title":"父母的沟通和监控是否能抑制青少年的物质使用?二元研究的范围综述。","authors":"Anna Joy Russ, Anna Bullo, Peter J Schulz","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2536312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In interpersonal research, it is often essential to consider multiple perspectives to fully capture the complexity of social relationships. For this reason, studies on the parent-child relationship frequently collect data from both parties. However, it remains unclear how such dyadic data are analyzed, and no systematic summary of findings currently exists. This scoping review examined studies that used dyadic data to explore the impact of parent-adolescent communication and parental monitoring on adolescent substance use, while also tracking the evolution of dyadic methodologies. A literature search across five databases yielded 2,849 articles, plus 18 manually added, narrowing to 31 studies from 1985 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were: (i) quantitative study, (ii) dyadic measures of communication and monitoring obtained by surveying both the adolescent and their caregiver, (iii) an adolescent population aged 10 to 17 years, and (iv) healthy, non-clinical participants. Findings on communication were mixed: one study linked it to reduced substance use, one to increased use, seven reported mixed results, and four found no significant association. Parental monitoring was never associated with increased use; most findings either supported a protective effect or showed no significant relationship. Notably, none of the studies employed an appropriate dyadic data analysis framework. In conclusion, this review highlights the importance of integrating dyadic perspectives and calls for standardized methodological approaches to better understand the interpersonal factors influencing adolescent substance use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Parental Communication and Monitoring Counteract Substance Use in Adolescents? A Scoping Review of Dyadic Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Joy Russ, Anna Bullo, Peter J Schulz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2025.2536312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In interpersonal research, it is often essential to consider multiple perspectives to fully capture the complexity of social relationships. For this reason, studies on the parent-child relationship frequently collect data from both parties. However, it remains unclear how such dyadic data are analyzed, and no systematic summary of findings currently exists. This scoping review examined studies that used dyadic data to explore the impact of parent-adolescent communication and parental monitoring on adolescent substance use, while also tracking the evolution of dyadic methodologies. A literature search across five databases yielded 2,849 articles, plus 18 manually added, narrowing to 31 studies from 1985 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were: (i) quantitative study, (ii) dyadic measures of communication and monitoring obtained by surveying both the adolescent and their caregiver, (iii) an adolescent population aged 10 to 17 years, and (iv) healthy, non-clinical participants. Findings on communication were mixed: one study linked it to reduced substance use, one to increased use, seven reported mixed results, and four found no significant association. Parental monitoring was never associated with increased use; most findings either supported a protective effect or showed no significant relationship. Notably, none of the studies employed an appropriate dyadic data analysis framework. In conclusion, this review highlights the importance of integrating dyadic perspectives and calls for standardized methodological approaches to better understand the interpersonal factors influencing adolescent substance use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2536312\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2536312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人际关系研究中,为了充分把握社会关系的复杂性,通常必须考虑多个角度。因此,关于亲子关系的研究往往会同时收集双方的数据。然而,目前尚不清楚如何分析这种二元数据,目前也没有系统的结论总结。这一范围审查审查了使用二元数据来探索父母-青少年沟通和父母监测对青少年物质使用的影响的研究,同时也跟踪了二元方法的演变。在五个数据库中进行文献检索,得出2849篇文章,加上18篇人工添加的文章,从1985年到2022年,研究范围缩小到31篇。纳入标准是:(i)定量研究,(ii)通过调查青少年及其照顾者获得的交流和监测的双重措施,(iii) 10至17岁的青少年人口,以及(iv)健康的非临床参与者。关于沟通的研究结果好坏参半:一项研究将其与减少物质使用联系起来,一项研究将其与增加物质使用联系起来,七项研究报告的结果好坏参半,四项研究没有发现显著的联系。父母的监督与药物使用的增加无关;大多数研究结果要么支持保护作用,要么没有显示出显著的关系。值得注意的是,没有一项研究采用适当的二元数据分析框架。总之,这篇综述强调了整合二元视角的重要性,并呼吁采用标准化的方法来更好地理解影响青少年药物使用的人际因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Parental Communication and Monitoring Counteract Substance Use in Adolescents? A Scoping Review of Dyadic Studies.

In interpersonal research, it is often essential to consider multiple perspectives to fully capture the complexity of social relationships. For this reason, studies on the parent-child relationship frequently collect data from both parties. However, it remains unclear how such dyadic data are analyzed, and no systematic summary of findings currently exists. This scoping review examined studies that used dyadic data to explore the impact of parent-adolescent communication and parental monitoring on adolescent substance use, while also tracking the evolution of dyadic methodologies. A literature search across five databases yielded 2,849 articles, plus 18 manually added, narrowing to 31 studies from 1985 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were: (i) quantitative study, (ii) dyadic measures of communication and monitoring obtained by surveying both the adolescent and their caregiver, (iii) an adolescent population aged 10 to 17 years, and (iv) healthy, non-clinical participants. Findings on communication were mixed: one study linked it to reduced substance use, one to increased use, seven reported mixed results, and four found no significant association. Parental monitoring was never associated with increased use; most findings either supported a protective effect or showed no significant relationship. Notably, none of the studies employed an appropriate dyadic data analysis framework. In conclusion, this review highlights the importance of integrating dyadic perspectives and calls for standardized methodological approaches to better understand the interpersonal factors influencing adolescent substance use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信