左心耳闭塞后抗血栓治疗方案的安全性评价。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Aanchal Sawhney, Rahul Gupta, Pranav Mahajan, Ankit Agrawal, Sergio Cossu, Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy
{"title":"左心耳闭塞后抗血栓治疗方案的安全性评价。","authors":"Aanchal Sawhney, Rahul Gupta, Pranav Mahajan, Ankit Agrawal, Sergio Cossu, Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2547007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a viable alternative to anticoagulation for treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who cannot tolerate anticoagulation. Post-procedure patients are generally prescribed oral anticoagulation (OAC) for 45 days, while the device is undergoing endothelialization, following which patients are continued on antiplatelet agents. Recommendations for antithrombotic agents following LAAO arrived by consensus, which are not tolerated by all patients.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review covers the safety profile of antithrombotic therapy options after LAAO. We discuss the side effect profiles including device-related thrombosis (DRT), bleeding, and thromboembolic events. The new randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis compared combinations of DOAC with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), VKA, or only SAPT and studied the incidence of major bleeding, DRT, and thromboembolic events. This review is a comprehensive summary of different antithrombotic agents' combinations along with the duration recommendations and emphasizes the importance of a discussion among involved team members and patients.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>In patients with NVAF undergoing LAAO, initial post-procedural antithrombotic monotherapy with DOAC is associated with low rates of thromboembolism, DRT, and major bleeding followed by DAPT. DAPT is associated with lower incidence of thromboembolic events in comparison to SAPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety review of antithrombotic therapy options after left atrial appendage occlusion.\",\"authors\":\"Aanchal Sawhney, Rahul Gupta, Pranav Mahajan, Ankit Agrawal, Sergio Cossu, Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2025.2547007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a viable alternative to anticoagulation for treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who cannot tolerate anticoagulation. Post-procedure patients are generally prescribed oral anticoagulation (OAC) for 45 days, while the device is undergoing endothelialization, following which patients are continued on antiplatelet agents. Recommendations for antithrombotic agents following LAAO arrived by consensus, which are not tolerated by all patients.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review covers the safety profile of antithrombotic therapy options after LAAO. We discuss the side effect profiles including device-related thrombosis (DRT), bleeding, and thromboembolic events. The new randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis compared combinations of DOAC with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), VKA, or only SAPT and studied the incidence of major bleeding, DRT, and thromboembolic events. This review is a comprehensive summary of different antithrombotic agents' combinations along with the duration recommendations and emphasizes the importance of a discussion among involved team members and patients.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>In patients with NVAF undergoing LAAO, initial post-procedural antithrombotic monotherapy with DOAC is associated with low rates of thromboembolism, DRT, and major bleeding followed by DAPT. DAPT is associated with lower incidence of thromboembolic events in comparison to SAPT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2547007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2547007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

左心耳闭塞(LAAO)是治疗不能耐受抗凝治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者的可行替代抗凝治疗方法。术后患者通常在设备进行内皮化期间服用口服抗凝剂(OAC) 45天,之后患者继续服用抗血小板药物。LAAO后抗血栓药物的推荐是一致的,但并非所有患者都能耐受。涵盖领域:本综述涵盖LAAO后抗血栓治疗方案的安全性。我们讨论的副作用包括器械相关血栓形成(DRT)、出血和血栓栓塞事件。新的随机对照试验和荟萃分析比较了DOAC与单抗血小板治疗(SAPT)、双抗血小板治疗(DAPT)、VKA或仅SAPT的联合治疗,并研究了大出血、DRT和血栓栓塞事件的发生率。该综述综合总结了不同的抗血栓药物组合以及推荐的持续时间,并强调了在相关团队成员和患者之间进行讨论的重要性。专家意见:接受LAAO的非瓣膜性房颤患者,最初的术后抗血栓单药治疗与低血栓栓塞率、DRT和大出血发生率相关,随后是DAPT。与SAPT相比,DAPT与较低的血栓栓塞事件发生率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety review of antithrombotic therapy options after left atrial appendage occlusion.

Introduction: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a viable alternative to anticoagulation for treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who cannot tolerate anticoagulation. Post-procedure patients are generally prescribed oral anticoagulation (OAC) for 45 days, while the device is undergoing endothelialization, following which patients are continued on antiplatelet agents. Recommendations for antithrombotic agents following LAAO arrived by consensus, which are not tolerated by all patients.

Areas covered: This review covers the safety profile of antithrombotic therapy options after LAAO. We discuss the side effect profiles including device-related thrombosis (DRT), bleeding, and thromboembolic events. The new randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis compared combinations of DOAC with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), VKA, or only SAPT and studied the incidence of major bleeding, DRT, and thromboembolic events. This review is a comprehensive summary of different antithrombotic agents' combinations along with the duration recommendations and emphasizes the importance of a discussion among involved team members and patients.

Expert opinion: In patients with NVAF undergoing LAAO, initial post-procedural antithrombotic monotherapy with DOAC is associated with low rates of thromboembolism, DRT, and major bleeding followed by DAPT. DAPT is associated with lower incidence of thromboembolic events in comparison to SAPT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信