{"title":"一线抗癫痫单药治疗和年龄在新诊断儿童癫痫治疗中的作用:一项来自三级中心的队列研究","authors":"Ningshan Li, Huiting Zhang, Chaoran Yang, Xiaoying Qiao, Dezhi Cao, Lina Men, Guangjun Yu, Jianxiang Liao","doi":"10.1111/epi.18607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was undertaken to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of first-line antiseizure medication (ASM) monotherapy in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy, focusing on comparative outcomes across developmental age groups and ASM types, and identifying clinical risk factors of treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 10 years of electronic medical records from Shenzhen Children's Hospital. Children aged ≤18 years who initiated monotherapy with one of five ASMs (oxcarbazepine, valproate, levetiracetam, topiramate, or lamotrigine) were included. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as sustained seizure and side effect freedom at the defined analytic endpoint. Outcomes based on the 2010 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition were also evaluated. Nineteen clinical variables across six domains were analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to adjust for confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7060 eligible patients with a median follow-up of 14.0 months, 47.9% achieved treatment success, and 48.3% met ILAE criteria. The median seizure- and side effect-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23.3-26.5 months). Oxcarbazepine (32.3%), valproate (31.7%), and levetiracetam (22.5%) were the most commonly prescribed ASMs. Treatment success did not differ significantly across ASM types or age groups. Epileptic spasms (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.98-4.09), generalized seizures (HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.49-2.13), seizures before reaching maintenance dose (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.37-1.70), delayed treatment initiation (HR ~ 1.30), and neurodevelopmental delay (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.26-1.60) were significant risk factors of treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>First-line ASMs showed similar effectiveness in routine pediatric care. Childhood epilepsy treatment outcomes were more strongly influenced by seizure characteristics, neurodevelopmental comorbidities, and timing of initiation than by ASM choice or age. These findings support extrapolating ASM efficacy across pediatric age groups and highlight the value of real-world evidence in treatment decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world comparison of first-line antiseizure monotherapy and the role of age at treatment initiation in newly diagnosed childhood epilepsy: A cohort study from a tertiary center.\",\"authors\":\"Ningshan Li, Huiting Zhang, Chaoran Yang, Xiaoying Qiao, Dezhi Cao, Lina Men, Guangjun Yu, Jianxiang Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was undertaken to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of first-line antiseizure medication (ASM) monotherapy in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy, focusing on comparative outcomes across developmental age groups and ASM types, and identifying clinical risk factors of treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 10 years of electronic medical records from Shenzhen Children's Hospital. Children aged ≤18 years who initiated monotherapy with one of five ASMs (oxcarbazepine, valproate, levetiracetam, topiramate, or lamotrigine) were included. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as sustained seizure and side effect freedom at the defined analytic endpoint. Outcomes based on the 2010 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition were also evaluated. Nineteen clinical variables across six domains were analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to adjust for confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7060 eligible patients with a median follow-up of 14.0 months, 47.9% achieved treatment success, and 48.3% met ILAE criteria. The median seizure- and side effect-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23.3-26.5 months). Oxcarbazepine (32.3%), valproate (31.7%), and levetiracetam (22.5%) were the most commonly prescribed ASMs. Treatment success did not differ significantly across ASM types or age groups. Epileptic spasms (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.98-4.09), generalized seizures (HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.49-2.13), seizures before reaching maintenance dose (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.37-1.70), delayed treatment initiation (HR ~ 1.30), and neurodevelopmental delay (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.26-1.60) were significant risk factors of treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>First-line ASMs showed similar effectiveness in routine pediatric care. Childhood epilepsy treatment outcomes were more strongly influenced by seizure characteristics, neurodevelopmental comorbidities, and timing of initiation than by ASM choice or age. These findings support extrapolating ASM efficacy across pediatric age groups and highlight the value of real-world evidence in treatment decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18607\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18607","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估一线抗癫痫药物(ASM)单药治疗新诊断癫痫患儿的实际疗效和耐受性,重点关注不同发育年龄组和ASM类型的比较结果,并确定治疗失败的临床危险因素。方法:回顾性队列研究分析深圳市儿童医院10年电子病历。年龄≤18岁的儿童开始单药治疗5种asm(奥卡西平、丙戊酸、左乙拉西坦、托吡酯或拉莫三嗪)中的一种。主要结局是治疗成功,定义为在定义的分析终点持续发作和无副作用。基于2010年国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)定义的结果也进行了评估。分析了六个领域的19个临床变量。采用多变量Cox回归和稳定的处理加权逆概率来调整混杂因素。结果:7060例符合条件的患者中位随访14.0个月,47.9%的患者获得治疗成功,48.3%的患者符合ILAE标准。中位无发作和无副作用生存期为24.8个月(95%可信区间[CI] = 23.3-26.5个月)。奥卡西平(32.3%)、丙戊酸酯(31.7%)和左乙拉西坦(22.5%)是最常用的抗抑郁药。治疗成功率在ASM类型和年龄组之间没有显著差异。癫痫痉挛(风险比[HR] = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.98 ~ 4.09)、全发性癫痫发作(HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.49 ~ 2.13)、达到维持剂量前癫痫发作(HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.37 ~ 1.70)、延迟开始治疗(HR ~ 1.30)和神经发育迟缓(HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.26 ~ 1.60)是治疗失败的重要危险因素。意义:一线asm在常规儿科护理中具有相似的疗效。与ASM的选择或年龄相比,癫痫发作特征、神经发育合并症和起始时间对儿童癫痫治疗结果的影响更大。这些发现支持推断ASM在儿科年龄组的疗效,并强调了现实世界证据在治疗决策中的价值。
Real-world comparison of first-line antiseizure monotherapy and the role of age at treatment initiation in newly diagnosed childhood epilepsy: A cohort study from a tertiary center.
Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of first-line antiseizure medication (ASM) monotherapy in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy, focusing on comparative outcomes across developmental age groups and ASM types, and identifying clinical risk factors of treatment failure.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 10 years of electronic medical records from Shenzhen Children's Hospital. Children aged ≤18 years who initiated monotherapy with one of five ASMs (oxcarbazepine, valproate, levetiracetam, topiramate, or lamotrigine) were included. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as sustained seizure and side effect freedom at the defined analytic endpoint. Outcomes based on the 2010 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition were also evaluated. Nineteen clinical variables across six domains were analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to adjust for confounding.
Results: Among 7060 eligible patients with a median follow-up of 14.0 months, 47.9% achieved treatment success, and 48.3% met ILAE criteria. The median seizure- and side effect-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23.3-26.5 months). Oxcarbazepine (32.3%), valproate (31.7%), and levetiracetam (22.5%) were the most commonly prescribed ASMs. Treatment success did not differ significantly across ASM types or age groups. Epileptic spasms (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.98-4.09), generalized seizures (HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.49-2.13), seizures before reaching maintenance dose (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.37-1.70), delayed treatment initiation (HR ~ 1.30), and neurodevelopmental delay (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.26-1.60) were significant risk factors of treatment failure.
Significance: First-line ASMs showed similar effectiveness in routine pediatric care. Childhood epilepsy treatment outcomes were more strongly influenced by seizure characteristics, neurodevelopmental comorbidities, and timing of initiation than by ASM choice or age. These findings support extrapolating ASM efficacy across pediatric age groups and highlight the value of real-world evidence in treatment decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.