用于预测肺癌术后肺部并发症的可解释机器学习模型的开发和验证:一项机器学习研究。

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shaolin Chen, Ting Deng, Qing Yang, Jin Li, Juanyan Shen, Xu Luo, Juan Tang, Xulian Zhang, Jordan Tovera Salvador, Junliang Ma
{"title":"用于预测肺癌术后肺部并发症的可解释机器学习模型的开发和验证:一项机器学习研究。","authors":"Shaolin Chen, Ting Deng, Qing Yang, Jin Li, Juanyan Shen, Xu Luo, Juan Tang, Xulian Zhang, Jordan Tovera Salvador, Junliang Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification and prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are vital for patient management in lung cancer (LC) surgery. However, existing predictive models often lack comprehensive validation and interpretability. This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model to predict PPCs in patients with LC undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A risk factor variable pool was determined by meta-analysis and Delphi surveys. Patients undergoing LC surgery who were admitted to the Thoracic Surgery Department at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from 1st January 2022 to 31st October 2023 (retrospective) and from 1st November 2023 to 31st July 2024 (prospective) were used for model development and prospective validation, respectively. The retrospective cohort was randomly split into a training set and an internal validation set at an 8:2 ratio. Feature selection involved univariate analysis, collinearity analysis, nine ML algorithms, and expert consensus. Twelve independent ML models and 26 stacking ensemble models were developed. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. Prospective validation was analysed using AUC, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) method was utilised to interpret the predictive model.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 883 patients were included in the retrospective cohort with an incidence of PPCs of 35.4% (313/883), and a total of 308 patients were included in the prospective cohort with PPCs of 29.5% (91/308). Nine key characteristics were selected for model development: age, duration of surgery, Charson comorbidity index (CCI), tumour stage, measured carbon monoxide diffusion (DLCO, mmol/min/kPa), intra-operative infusion volume (IFIV, mL), red blood cell volume distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV, %), body mass index (BMI), and number of years of smoking. Amongst the independent models, the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) showed best performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.774-0.885). The stacking ensemble combining Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT) showed the highest overall performance, with an AUROC of 0.860 (95% CI: 0.809-0.911), and DCA showed higher clinical utility compared to other models. In the prospective validation, the AUROC was 0.790 (95% CI: 0.744-0.835).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The stacking ensemble model combining SVM and DT demonstrated robust predictive performance and favourable clinical utility for prediction PPCs in patients undergoing LC surgery. However, the model has not been applied in clinical practice and requires future validation in large, multi-centre cohorts. Further work should aim to identify high-risk patients early through clinical data analysis, enabling timely interventions and more efficient allocation of limited healthcare resources.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Health Commission; the Key Talent Team of Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Innovation; and Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Basic Research Project.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"86 ","pages":"103386"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery: a machine learning study.\",\"authors\":\"Shaolin Chen, Ting Deng, Qing Yang, Jin Li, Juanyan Shen, Xu Luo, Juan Tang, Xulian Zhang, Jordan Tovera Salvador, Junliang Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification and prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are vital for patient management in lung cancer (LC) surgery. However, existing predictive models often lack comprehensive validation and interpretability. This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model to predict PPCs in patients with LC undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A risk factor variable pool was determined by meta-analysis and Delphi surveys. Patients undergoing LC surgery who were admitted to the Thoracic Surgery Department at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from 1st January 2022 to 31st October 2023 (retrospective) and from 1st November 2023 to 31st July 2024 (prospective) were used for model development and prospective validation, respectively. The retrospective cohort was randomly split into a training set and an internal validation set at an 8:2 ratio. Feature selection involved univariate analysis, collinearity analysis, nine ML algorithms, and expert consensus. Twelve independent ML models and 26 stacking ensemble models were developed. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. Prospective validation was analysed using AUC, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) method was utilised to interpret the predictive model.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 883 patients were included in the retrospective cohort with an incidence of PPCs of 35.4% (313/883), and a total of 308 patients were included in the prospective cohort with PPCs of 29.5% (91/308). Nine key characteristics were selected for model development: age, duration of surgery, Charson comorbidity index (CCI), tumour stage, measured carbon monoxide diffusion (DLCO, mmol/min/kPa), intra-operative infusion volume (IFIV, mL), red blood cell volume distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV, %), body mass index (BMI), and number of years of smoking. Amongst the independent models, the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) showed best performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.774-0.885). The stacking ensemble combining Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT) showed the highest overall performance, with an AUROC of 0.860 (95% CI: 0.809-0.911), and DCA showed higher clinical utility compared to other models. In the prospective validation, the AUROC was 0.790 (95% CI: 0.744-0.835).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The stacking ensemble model combining SVM and DT demonstrated robust predictive performance and favourable clinical utility for prediction PPCs in patients undergoing LC surgery. However, the model has not been applied in clinical practice and requires future validation in large, multi-centre cohorts. Further work should aim to identify high-risk patients early through clinical data analysis, enabling timely interventions and more efficient allocation of limited healthcare resources.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Health Commission; the Key Talent Team of Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Innovation; and Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Basic Research Project.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"103386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103386\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103386","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期识别和预测术后肺部并发症(PPCs)对肺癌(LC)手术患者管理至关重要。然而,现有的预测模型往往缺乏全面的验证和可解释性。本研究旨在开发和验证一种可解释的机器学习(ML)模型,以预测LC手术患者的PPCs。方法:采用荟萃分析和德尔菲调查确定危险因素变量池。采用2022年1月1日至2023年10月31日(回顾性)和2023年11月1日至2024年7月31日(前瞻性)在遵义医科大学附属医院胸外科收治的LC手术患者分别进行模型开发和前瞻性验证。回顾性队列随机分为训练组和内部验证组,比例为8:2。特征选择涉及单变量分析、共线性分析、9种机器学习算法和专家共识。建立了12个独立的ML模型和26个叠加集成模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和F1评分来评估预测效果。采用AUC、Hosmer-Lemeshow检验、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)进行前瞻性验证分析。采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)方法对预测模型进行解释。结果:回顾性队列共纳入883例患者,PPCs发生率为35.4%(313/883);前瞻性队列共纳入308例患者,PPCs发生率为29.5%(91/308)。选择9个关键特征进行模型开发:年龄、手术时间、Charson合并症指数(CCI)、肿瘤分期、测量一氧化碳扩散(DLCO, mmol/min/kPa)、术中输注量(IFIV, mL)、红细胞体积分布宽度变异系数(RDW-CV, %)、体重指数(BMI)和吸烟年数。在独立模型中,梯度增强决策树(GBDT)表现最好,AUROC为0.829 (95% CI: 0.774-0.885)。支持向量机(SVM)和决策树(DT)相结合的叠加集成综合性能最高,AUROC为0.860 (95% CI: 0.809-0.911), DCA模型比其他模型具有更高的临床实用性。在前瞻性验证中,AUROC为0.790 (95% CI: 0.744-0.835)。解释:将支持向量机和DT相结合的叠加集成模型在预测LC手术患者PPCs方面表现出强大的预测性能和良好的临床应用。然而,该模型尚未应用于临床实践,需要未来在大型多中心队列中进行验证。进一步的工作应旨在通过临床数据分析早期识别高危患者,以便及时干预并更有效地分配有限的医疗资源。资助项目:贵州省卫生健康委员会科技基金;贵州省科技创新重点人才团队;贵州省科技合作基础研究项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery: a machine learning study.

Background: Early identification and prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are vital for patient management in lung cancer (LC) surgery. However, existing predictive models often lack comprehensive validation and interpretability. This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model to predict PPCs in patients with LC undergoing surgery.

Methods: A risk factor variable pool was determined by meta-analysis and Delphi surveys. Patients undergoing LC surgery who were admitted to the Thoracic Surgery Department at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from 1st January 2022 to 31st October 2023 (retrospective) and from 1st November 2023 to 31st July 2024 (prospective) were used for model development and prospective validation, respectively. The retrospective cohort was randomly split into a training set and an internal validation set at an 8:2 ratio. Feature selection involved univariate analysis, collinearity analysis, nine ML algorithms, and expert consensus. Twelve independent ML models and 26 stacking ensemble models were developed. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. Prospective validation was analysed using AUC, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) method was utilised to interpret the predictive model.

Findings: A total of 883 patients were included in the retrospective cohort with an incidence of PPCs of 35.4% (313/883), and a total of 308 patients were included in the prospective cohort with PPCs of 29.5% (91/308). Nine key characteristics were selected for model development: age, duration of surgery, Charson comorbidity index (CCI), tumour stage, measured carbon monoxide diffusion (DLCO, mmol/min/kPa), intra-operative infusion volume (IFIV, mL), red blood cell volume distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV, %), body mass index (BMI), and number of years of smoking. Amongst the independent models, the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) showed best performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.774-0.885). The stacking ensemble combining Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT) showed the highest overall performance, with an AUROC of 0.860 (95% CI: 0.809-0.911), and DCA showed higher clinical utility compared to other models. In the prospective validation, the AUROC was 0.790 (95% CI: 0.744-0.835).

Interpretation: The stacking ensemble model combining SVM and DT demonstrated robust predictive performance and favourable clinical utility for prediction PPCs in patients undergoing LC surgery. However, the model has not been applied in clinical practice and requires future validation in large, multi-centre cohorts. Further work should aim to identify high-risk patients early through clinical data analysis, enabling timely interventions and more efficient allocation of limited healthcare resources.

Funding: The Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Health Commission; the Key Talent Team of Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Innovation; and Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Basic Research Project.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信