腋窝淋巴结清扫在乳腺癌新辅助化疗后残余淋巴结病变中的作用。

IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research Pub Date : 2025-08-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11782234251352996
Kristina Shaffer, Lilian Harris, Lori Gentile, Amelia Merrill, Lori Kellam, Michelle Fillion, Peter Turk
{"title":"腋窝淋巴结清扫在乳腺癌新辅助化疗后残余淋巴结病变中的作用。","authors":"Kristina Shaffer, Lilian Harris, Lori Gentile, Amelia Merrill, Lori Kellam, Michelle Fillion, Peter Turk","doi":"10.1177/11782234251352996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> While sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with limited axillary disease undergoing upfront surgery is well-accepted, there are insufficient data supporting its safety with residual nodal disease (RND) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate axillary management and oncologic outcomes of patients with RND. <b>Design:</b> A retrospective review comparing patients receiving SLNB to those receiving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). <b>Methods:</b> Patients treated for breast cancer at our institution between 2015 and 2023, who received NAC and had RND, were identified. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes information were collected. The relationship between axillary management and oncologic outcomes was examined. <b>Results:</b> Of 155 patients, median age was 55 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46-64) and follow-up 56 months (IQR 34-73). Most patients were pathologic tumor stage 1-2 (105, 67.7%) and nodal stage 1 (106, 68.4%), with ductal histology (127, 81.9%). The most common receptor pattern was estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative. A total of 107 (69.0%) underwent mastectomy, 47 (30.3%) lumpectomy, and 138 (89.0%) received adjuvant radiation. Regarding axillary management, 121 (78.1%) underwent ALND and 34 (21.9%) SLNB. Univariate analysis found no differences in overall survival (68.6% vs 70.6%; <i>P</i> = 1), any recurrence (local, axillary, or distant; 36.4% vs 35.3%; <i>P</i> = 1), or specifically axillary recurrence (9.9% vs 8.8%; <i>P</i> = 1), between ALND and SLNB groups, respectively. This was also demonstrated on multivariate analysis. Conversely, there was a significantly increased rate of lymphedema in the ALND, 57.9%, vs the SLNB group, 35.3% (<i>P</i> = 0.03). <b>Conclusions:</b> ALND was not associated with improved survival or recurrence risk compared with SLNB in patients with RND following NAC, but was found to have a higher rate of lymphedema. This study is limited due to its retrospective nature. Further data, such as from the ALLIANCE A011202 trial, will help to further clarify the optimal oncologic management for this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9163,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research","volume":"19 ","pages":"11782234251352996"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients With Residual Nodal Disease After Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Shaffer, Lilian Harris, Lori Gentile, Amelia Merrill, Lori Kellam, Michelle Fillion, Peter Turk\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11782234251352996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> While sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with limited axillary disease undergoing upfront surgery is well-accepted, there are insufficient data supporting its safety with residual nodal disease (RND) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate axillary management and oncologic outcomes of patients with RND. <b>Design:</b> A retrospective review comparing patients receiving SLNB to those receiving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). <b>Methods:</b> Patients treated for breast cancer at our institution between 2015 and 2023, who received NAC and had RND, were identified. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes information were collected. The relationship between axillary management and oncologic outcomes was examined. <b>Results:</b> Of 155 patients, median age was 55 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46-64) and follow-up 56 months (IQR 34-73). Most patients were pathologic tumor stage 1-2 (105, 67.7%) and nodal stage 1 (106, 68.4%), with ductal histology (127, 81.9%). The most common receptor pattern was estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative. A total of 107 (69.0%) underwent mastectomy, 47 (30.3%) lumpectomy, and 138 (89.0%) received adjuvant radiation. Regarding axillary management, 121 (78.1%) underwent ALND and 34 (21.9%) SLNB. Univariate analysis found no differences in overall survival (68.6% vs 70.6%; <i>P</i> = 1), any recurrence (local, axillary, or distant; 36.4% vs 35.3%; <i>P</i> = 1), or specifically axillary recurrence (9.9% vs 8.8%; <i>P</i> = 1), between ALND and SLNB groups, respectively. This was also demonstrated on multivariate analysis. Conversely, there was a significantly increased rate of lymphedema in the ALND, 57.9%, vs the SLNB group, 35.3% (<i>P</i> = 0.03). <b>Conclusions:</b> ALND was not associated with improved survival or recurrence risk compared with SLNB in patients with RND following NAC, but was found to have a higher rate of lymphedema. This study is limited due to its retrospective nature. Further data, such as from the ALLIANCE A011202 trial, will help to further clarify the optimal oncologic management for this group of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"11782234251352996\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336399/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782234251352996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782234251352996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)在局限性腋窝疾病的乳腺癌患者接受前期手术是被广泛接受的,但没有足够的数据支持其在新辅助化疗(NAC)后残留淋巴结疾病(RND)的安全性。目的:评价RND患者的腋窝处理及肿瘤预后。设计:一项回顾性研究,比较接受SLNB和接受腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)患者。方法:选取2015年至2023年间在我院接受NAC治疗并有RND的乳腺癌患者。收集患者和肿瘤特征、治疗方法和结局信息。检查腋窝治疗与肿瘤预后的关系。结果:155例患者中位年龄为55岁(四分位间距[IQR] 46-64),随访56个月(IQR 34-73)。以病理肿瘤1-2期(105例,67.7%)和淋巴结1期(106例,68.4%)居多,有导管组织学(127例,81.9%)。最常见的受体模式是雌激素受体阳性,孕激素受体阳性,人表皮生长因子受体2阴性。107例(69.0%)行乳房切除术,47例(30.3%)行乳房肿瘤切除术,138例(89.0%)行辅助放疗。在腋窝治疗方面,121例(78.1%)行ALND, 34例(21.9%)行SLNB。单因素分析发现总生存率无差异(68.6% vs 70.6%;P = 1),有无复发(局部、腋窝或远处;36.4% vs 35.3%;P = 1),特别是腋窝复发(9.9% vs 8.8%;P = 1),分别为ALND组和SLNB组。多变量分析也证实了这一点。相反,ALND组淋巴水肿发生率为57.9%,而SLNB组为35.3% (P = 0.03)。结论:与SLNB相比,在NAC后的RND患者中,ALND与生存率或复发风险的改善无关,但发现其淋巴水肿率更高。由于是回顾性研究,本研究存在一定的局限性。进一步的数据,如来自ALLIANCE A011202试验的数据,将有助于进一步明确这组患者的最佳肿瘤管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Role of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients With Residual Nodal Disease After Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

The Role of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients With Residual Nodal Disease After Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

The Role of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients With Residual Nodal Disease After Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

The Role of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients With Residual Nodal Disease After Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Background: While sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with limited axillary disease undergoing upfront surgery is well-accepted, there are insufficient data supporting its safety with residual nodal disease (RND) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Objectives: To evaluate axillary management and oncologic outcomes of patients with RND. Design: A retrospective review comparing patients receiving SLNB to those receiving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Methods: Patients treated for breast cancer at our institution between 2015 and 2023, who received NAC and had RND, were identified. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes information were collected. The relationship between axillary management and oncologic outcomes was examined. Results: Of 155 patients, median age was 55 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46-64) and follow-up 56 months (IQR 34-73). Most patients were pathologic tumor stage 1-2 (105, 67.7%) and nodal stage 1 (106, 68.4%), with ductal histology (127, 81.9%). The most common receptor pattern was estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative. A total of 107 (69.0%) underwent mastectomy, 47 (30.3%) lumpectomy, and 138 (89.0%) received adjuvant radiation. Regarding axillary management, 121 (78.1%) underwent ALND and 34 (21.9%) SLNB. Univariate analysis found no differences in overall survival (68.6% vs 70.6%; P = 1), any recurrence (local, axillary, or distant; 36.4% vs 35.3%; P = 1), or specifically axillary recurrence (9.9% vs 8.8%; P = 1), between ALND and SLNB groups, respectively. This was also demonstrated on multivariate analysis. Conversely, there was a significantly increased rate of lymphedema in the ALND, 57.9%, vs the SLNB group, 35.3% (P = 0.03). Conclusions: ALND was not associated with improved survival or recurrence risk compared with SLNB in patients with RND following NAC, but was found to have a higher rate of lymphedema. This study is limited due to its retrospective nature. Further data, such as from the ALLIANCE A011202 trial, will help to further clarify the optimal oncologic management for this group of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, journal which considers manuscripts on all areas of breast cancer research and treatment. We welcome original research, short notes, case studies and review articles related to breast cancer-related research. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to, breast cancer sub types, pathobiology, metastasis, genetics and epigenetics, mammary gland biology, breast cancer models, prevention, detection, therapy and clinical interventions, and epidemiology and population genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信