提高子宫颈普查的公平和效率:一项多学科质素改善计划。

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carlos Santos, Julie Roye, Joyce Tucker, Christina Guevara
{"title":"提高子宫颈普查的公平和效率:一项多学科质素改善计划。","authors":"Carlos Santos, Julie Roye, Joyce Tucker, Christina Guevara","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer screening is vital for early detection and prevention, yet uptake remains suboptimal in diverse communities.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Cauldwell Medical Centre reported cervical screening uptake rates of 54% (ages 25-49) and 62% (ages 50-64) by June 2022, both significantly below the national target of 80%, with a concerning 8 percentage point disparity between age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using quality improvement (QI) methodologies, including Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and statistical process control charts, the team tested eight cycles of change grouped into three high-impact actions designed to improve accessibility, trust and personalisation of cervical screening services. Tests of change included culturally sensitive outreach, extended clinic hours and a self-booking system to enhance accessibility and engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This QI initiative achieved a marked reduction in age-related inequalities in cervical screening uptake. By the end of the intervention period (March 2023), screening rates increased from 54% to 69% among women aged 25-49 and from 62% to 72% among women aged 50-64, narrowing the gap from 8 to 3 percentage points-a 60% reduction in disparity. By the final monitoring week, uptake further increased to 73% (ages 25-49) and 82% (ages 50-64), demonstrating how structured QI approaches can amplify the effectiveness of existing healthcare processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project highlights that systematically applying QI methodologies can effectively address healthcare inequalities, providing a scalable model for improving cervical screening uptake among under-represented populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Santos, Julie Roye, Joyce Tucker, Christina Guevara\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer screening is vital for early detection and prevention, yet uptake remains suboptimal in diverse communities.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Cauldwell Medical Centre reported cervical screening uptake rates of 54% (ages 25-49) and 62% (ages 50-64) by June 2022, both significantly below the national target of 80%, with a concerning 8 percentage point disparity between age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using quality improvement (QI) methodologies, including Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and statistical process control charts, the team tested eight cycles of change grouped into three high-impact actions designed to improve accessibility, trust and personalisation of cervical screening services. Tests of change included culturally sensitive outreach, extended clinic hours and a self-booking system to enhance accessibility and engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This QI initiative achieved a marked reduction in age-related inequalities in cervical screening uptake. By the end of the intervention period (March 2023), screening rates increased from 54% to 69% among women aged 25-49 and from 62% to 72% among women aged 50-64, narrowing the gap from 8 to 3 percentage points-a 60% reduction in disparity. By the final monitoring week, uptake further increased to 73% (ages 25-49) and 82% (ages 50-64), demonstrating how structured QI approaches can amplify the effectiveness of existing healthcare processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project highlights that systematically applying QI methodologies can effectively address healthcare inequalities, providing a scalable model for improving cervical screening uptake among under-represented populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352271/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:宫颈癌筛查对于早期发现和预防是至关重要的,但在不同的社区中,接受程度仍然不理想。地方问题:考尔德威尔医疗中心报告说,到2022年6月,宫颈筛查的接受率为54%(25-49岁)和62%(50-64岁),两者都大大低于80%的国家目标,年龄组之间的差距令人担忧,达8个百分点。方法:采用质量改进(QI)方法,包括计划-执行-研究-行动周期和统计过程控制图,团队测试了八个周期的变化,分为三个高影响力的行动,旨在改善子宫颈筛查服务的可及性、信任度和个性化。变革的测试包括文化敏感性外展,延长诊所时间和自助预约系统,以提高可及性和参与度。结果:这一倡议取得了显著减少与年龄相关的宫颈筛查不平等。到干预期结束时(2023年3月),25-49岁妇女的筛查率从54%上升到69%,50-64岁妇女的筛查率从62%上升到72%,差距从8个百分点缩小到3个百分点,差距缩小了60%。到最后一个监测周,使用率进一步增加到73%(25-49岁)和82%(50-64岁),这表明结构化QI方法可以增强现有医疗保健流程的有效性。结论:该项目强调,系统地应用QI方法可以有效地解决医疗不平等问题,为改善代表性不足人群的子宫颈筛查提供了一个可扩展的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing equity and efficiency in cervical screening uptake: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative.

Background: Cervical cancer screening is vital for early detection and prevention, yet uptake remains suboptimal in diverse communities.

Local problem: Cauldwell Medical Centre reported cervical screening uptake rates of 54% (ages 25-49) and 62% (ages 50-64) by June 2022, both significantly below the national target of 80%, with a concerning 8 percentage point disparity between age groups.

Methods: Using quality improvement (QI) methodologies, including Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and statistical process control charts, the team tested eight cycles of change grouped into three high-impact actions designed to improve accessibility, trust and personalisation of cervical screening services. Tests of change included culturally sensitive outreach, extended clinic hours and a self-booking system to enhance accessibility and engagement.

Results: This QI initiative achieved a marked reduction in age-related inequalities in cervical screening uptake. By the end of the intervention period (March 2023), screening rates increased from 54% to 69% among women aged 25-49 and from 62% to 72% among women aged 50-64, narrowing the gap from 8 to 3 percentage points-a 60% reduction in disparity. By the final monitoring week, uptake further increased to 73% (ages 25-49) and 82% (ages 50-64), demonstrating how structured QI approaches can amplify the effectiveness of existing healthcare processes.

Conclusions: This project highlights that systematically applying QI methodologies can effectively address healthcare inequalities, providing a scalable model for improving cervical screening uptake among under-represented populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信