Thibaut Wolf, Damien Reita, Marlène Deschuyter, Chinar Salmanli, Julie Buffa, Erwan Pencreach, Eric Guérin, Eric Jeandidier, Marguerite Miguet, Marie-Pierre Chenard, Lucas Geyer, Georges Noel, Julien Todeschi, Guillaume Gauchotte, Sophie Martin, Natacha Entz-Werlé, Benoît Lhermitte
{"title":"具有挑战性的CDKN2A在braf改变的胶质瘤中的评估:来自多形性黄色星形细胞瘤富集队列的经验教训。","authors":"Thibaut Wolf, Damien Reita, Marlène Deschuyter, Chinar Salmanli, Julie Buffa, Erwan Pencreach, Eric Guérin, Eric Jeandidier, Marguerite Miguet, Marie-Pierre Chenard, Lucas Geyer, Georges Noel, Julien Todeschi, Guillaume Gauchotte, Sophie Martin, Natacha Entz-Werlé, Benoît Lhermitte","doi":"10.1186/s40478-025-02089-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Detecting homozygous deletion (HD) of CDKN2A is critical in BRAF-altered gliomas, as this molecular alteration has both diagnostic and prognostic significance. It is predominantly associated with BRAF-altered high-grade gliomas and has been associated with poorer prognosis in certain BRAF-altered low-grade glioma tumor types. The 2021 WHO classification of central nervous system tumors therefore recommends screening for this alteration in most BRAF-altered gliomas, but it does not recommend one specific technique over another. Here, we compare the performance of several detection methods, including p16 immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), droplet digital PCR, next-generation sequencing and DNA methylation profiling-derived copy-number variation (CNV) analysis, in a retrospective cohort of 25 BRAF-altered gliomas. Ten cases showed diffuse p16 immunohistochemical expression (10/25) with no associated CDKN2A HD, whereas 15 cases had complete absence of p16 expression (15/25). In the latter group, a high level of discrepancy in CDKN2A HD detection when considering FISH versus other techniques was observed, suggesting a high false-negative rate with FISH. Using an original bioinformatic pipeline leveraging genome alignment of routinely available CNV raw data, we identified among most false-negative cases (4/5) a large and undeleted region encompassing MTAP, which is targeted by most commercial CDKN2A FISH probes. This is likely due to non-specific probe hybridization. Our finding suggests that FISH probes targeting the entire 9p21 locus may have lower sensitivity than anticipated among BRAF-altered gliomas and emphasizes the critical need for appropriate probe selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":6914,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropathologica Communications","volume":"13 1","pages":"170"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging CDKN2A assessment in BRAF-altered gliomas: lessons from a pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma-enriched cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Thibaut Wolf, Damien Reita, Marlène Deschuyter, Chinar Salmanli, Julie Buffa, Erwan Pencreach, Eric Guérin, Eric Jeandidier, Marguerite Miguet, Marie-Pierre Chenard, Lucas Geyer, Georges Noel, Julien Todeschi, Guillaume Gauchotte, Sophie Martin, Natacha Entz-Werlé, Benoît Lhermitte\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40478-025-02089-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Detecting homozygous deletion (HD) of CDKN2A is critical in BRAF-altered gliomas, as this molecular alteration has both diagnostic and prognostic significance. It is predominantly associated with BRAF-altered high-grade gliomas and has been associated with poorer prognosis in certain BRAF-altered low-grade glioma tumor types. The 2021 WHO classification of central nervous system tumors therefore recommends screening for this alteration in most BRAF-altered gliomas, but it does not recommend one specific technique over another. Here, we compare the performance of several detection methods, including p16 immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), droplet digital PCR, next-generation sequencing and DNA methylation profiling-derived copy-number variation (CNV) analysis, in a retrospective cohort of 25 BRAF-altered gliomas. Ten cases showed diffuse p16 immunohistochemical expression (10/25) with no associated CDKN2A HD, whereas 15 cases had complete absence of p16 expression (15/25). In the latter group, a high level of discrepancy in CDKN2A HD detection when considering FISH versus other techniques was observed, suggesting a high false-negative rate with FISH. Using an original bioinformatic pipeline leveraging genome alignment of routinely available CNV raw data, we identified among most false-negative cases (4/5) a large and undeleted region encompassing MTAP, which is targeted by most commercial CDKN2A FISH probes. This is likely due to non-specific probe hybridization. Our finding suggests that FISH probes targeting the entire 9p21 locus may have lower sensitivity than anticipated among BRAF-altered gliomas and emphasizes the critical need for appropriate probe selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neuropathologica Communications\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337364/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neuropathologica Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-025-02089-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropathologica Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-025-02089-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Challenging CDKN2A assessment in BRAF-altered gliomas: lessons from a pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma-enriched cohort.
Detecting homozygous deletion (HD) of CDKN2A is critical in BRAF-altered gliomas, as this molecular alteration has both diagnostic and prognostic significance. It is predominantly associated with BRAF-altered high-grade gliomas and has been associated with poorer prognosis in certain BRAF-altered low-grade glioma tumor types. The 2021 WHO classification of central nervous system tumors therefore recommends screening for this alteration in most BRAF-altered gliomas, but it does not recommend one specific technique over another. Here, we compare the performance of several detection methods, including p16 immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), droplet digital PCR, next-generation sequencing and DNA methylation profiling-derived copy-number variation (CNV) analysis, in a retrospective cohort of 25 BRAF-altered gliomas. Ten cases showed diffuse p16 immunohistochemical expression (10/25) with no associated CDKN2A HD, whereas 15 cases had complete absence of p16 expression (15/25). In the latter group, a high level of discrepancy in CDKN2A HD detection when considering FISH versus other techniques was observed, suggesting a high false-negative rate with FISH. Using an original bioinformatic pipeline leveraging genome alignment of routinely available CNV raw data, we identified among most false-negative cases (4/5) a large and undeleted region encompassing MTAP, which is targeted by most commercial CDKN2A FISH probes. This is likely due to non-specific probe hybridization. Our finding suggests that FISH probes targeting the entire 9p21 locus may have lower sensitivity than anticipated among BRAF-altered gliomas and emphasizes the critical need for appropriate probe selection.
期刊介绍:
"Acta Neuropathologica Communications (ANC)" is a peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the rapid publication of research articles focused on the mechanisms underlying neurological diseases. The journal emphasizes the use of molecular, cellular, and morphological techniques applied to experimental or human tissues to investigate the pathogenesis of neurological disorders.
ANC is committed to a fast-track publication process, aiming to publish accepted manuscripts within two months of submission. This expedited timeline is designed to ensure that the latest findings in neuroscience and pathology are disseminated quickly to the scientific community, fostering rapid advancements in the field of neurology and neuroscience. The journal's focus on cutting-edge research and its swift publication schedule make it a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and other professionals interested in the study and treatment of neurological conditions.