使用避孕的意图:计划生育新需求指标的承诺与陷阱。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Jamaica Corker,Ilene S Speizer,Jean Christophe Fotso,Niranjan Saggurti,Elizabeth Sully
{"title":"使用避孕的意图:计划生育新需求指标的承诺与陷阱。","authors":"Jamaica Corker,Ilene S Speizer,Jean Christophe Fotso,Niranjan Saggurti,Elizabeth Sully","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The \"intention to use\" (ITU) contraception indicator has gained recent prominence as a proposed high-level success metric for family planning (FP) programs and as a step toward identifying measures that better capture what women want. Although ITU offers advantages over traditional indicators like contraceptive prevalence and unmet need, its elevation as a key programmatic measure requires critical examination. In this commentary, we outline advantages of ITU to measure FP demand and offer critiques and considerations for reliance on ITU as a demand metric for measuring programmatic success. We argue that while ITU may be a step toward more person-centered measurement, it is not inherently person-centered. Rather than positioning ITU as an innovative person-centered breakthrough, we argue it should be considered a transitional measure-a bridge toward more comprehensive indicators that capture the complexities of contraceptive decision-making. We recognize the current lack of viable alternatives for programs seeking a singular person-centered measure; when used, ITU should be complemented by additional topline indicators that capture access, agency, and preferences. With declining research funding and data infrastructure disruptions, it is important that ITU complement, not replace, efforts to develop the next generation of FP measurement that meaningfully reflects people's contraceptive realities.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intention to Use Contraception: Promises and Pitfalls of Family Planning's Emerging Demand Indicator.\",\"authors\":\"Jamaica Corker,Ilene S Speizer,Jean Christophe Fotso,Niranjan Saggurti,Elizabeth Sully\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sifp.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The \\\"intention to use\\\" (ITU) contraception indicator has gained recent prominence as a proposed high-level success metric for family planning (FP) programs and as a step toward identifying measures that better capture what women want. Although ITU offers advantages over traditional indicators like contraceptive prevalence and unmet need, its elevation as a key programmatic measure requires critical examination. In this commentary, we outline advantages of ITU to measure FP demand and offer critiques and considerations for reliance on ITU as a demand metric for measuring programmatic success. We argue that while ITU may be a step toward more person-centered measurement, it is not inherently person-centered. Rather than positioning ITU as an innovative person-centered breakthrough, we argue it should be considered a transitional measure-a bridge toward more comprehensive indicators that capture the complexities of contraceptive decision-making. We recognize the current lack of viable alternatives for programs seeking a singular person-centered measure; when used, ITU should be complemented by additional topline indicators that capture access, agency, and preferences. With declining research funding and data infrastructure disruptions, it is important that ITU complement, not replace, efforts to develop the next generation of FP measurement that meaningfully reflects people's contraceptive realities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Family Planning\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Family Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“使用意愿”(ITU)避孕指标作为计划生育(FP)项目的一项高水平成功衡量标准,作为确定更好地捕捉妇女需求的措施的一个步骤,最近得到了重视。尽管国际电联比避孕普及率和未满足需求等传统指标具有优势,但将其提升为一项关键的方案措施需要进行严格审查。在本评论中,我们概述了国际电联衡量FP需求的优势,并对依赖国际电联作为衡量计划成功的需求指标提出了批评和考虑。我们认为,虽然国际电联可能朝着更加以人为本的测量迈出了一步,但它本身并非以人为本。我们认为,不应将国际电联定位为一项以人为本的创新突破,而应将其视为一项过渡性措施——一座通往更全面指标的桥梁,这些指标反映了避孕决策的复杂性。我们认识到,目前缺乏可行的替代方案来寻求以人为本的单一衡量标准;在使用时,国际电联应辅以额外的获取接入、机构和偏好的顶线指标。随着研究经费的减少和数据基础设施的中断,国际电联必须补充而不是取代制定有意义地反映人们避孕现实的下一代计划生育衡量标准的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intention to Use Contraception: Promises and Pitfalls of Family Planning's Emerging Demand Indicator.
The "intention to use" (ITU) contraception indicator has gained recent prominence as a proposed high-level success metric for family planning (FP) programs and as a step toward identifying measures that better capture what women want. Although ITU offers advantages over traditional indicators like contraceptive prevalence and unmet need, its elevation as a key programmatic measure requires critical examination. In this commentary, we outline advantages of ITU to measure FP demand and offer critiques and considerations for reliance on ITU as a demand metric for measuring programmatic success. We argue that while ITU may be a step toward more person-centered measurement, it is not inherently person-centered. Rather than positioning ITU as an innovative person-centered breakthrough, we argue it should be considered a transitional measure-a bridge toward more comprehensive indicators that capture the complexities of contraceptive decision-making. We recognize the current lack of viable alternatives for programs seeking a singular person-centered measure; when used, ITU should be complemented by additional topline indicators that capture access, agency, and preferences. With declining research funding and data infrastructure disruptions, it is important that ITU complement, not replace, efforts to develop the next generation of FP measurement that meaningfully reflects people's contraceptive realities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信