Paula Vela-Martín, Juan Francisco Oteo, Eusebio Garcia-Izquierdo, Carlos Arellano-Serrano, Alvaro Lorente-Ros, Melodie Segura-Dominguez, Arturo Garcia-Touchard, María Del Trigo, Jose Antonio Fernandez-Diaz, Victor Castro-Urda
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术后左束支区起搏。单一中心体验。","authors":"Paula Vela-Martín, Juan Francisco Oteo, Eusebio Garcia-Izquierdo, Carlos Arellano-Serrano, Alvaro Lorente-Ros, Melodie Segura-Dominguez, Arturo Garcia-Touchard, María Del Trigo, Jose Antonio Fernandez-Diaz, Victor Castro-Urda","doi":"10.1111/pace.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Permanent pacing after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) causes higher rates of death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may mitigate these adverse events, although experience is limited yet.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes of LBBAP after TAVI during the first year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center, retrospective observational study of patients who underwent LBBAP after TAVI between January 2020 and December 2023. Indication for permanent pacing, procedural details, LVEF and NTproBNP were assessed at implantation. Changes in electrophysiological parameters, LVEF, NtproBNP and adverse clinical events were evaluated at 1 year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 patients underwent LBBAP after TAVI, primarily due to pathologycal eletrophysiological study (44.9%) or complete/high degree atrioventricular block (42.9%). LBBAP reduced QRS duration post-TAVI (147.1 ± 26.4 ms vs. 119.6 ± 12.6 ms, p < 0.001). Acute complications occurred in 10.2% of patients, resolving during hospitalization. During follow-up (15.6 ± 7.0 months), improvement in capture threshold and reduction in ventricular lead impedance were observed. NTproBNP levels decreased significantly, while LVEF remained stable (61.8% [52.0-67.2] vs. 59.0% [51.0-66.0], p = 0.357). Notably, the six patients with baseline LVEF < 40% showed significant LVEF improvement. A total of 12.2% of patients were hospitalized for HF and 12.2% died (half of them due to cardiovascular causes). Multivariate analysis identified atrial fibrillation as the sole predictor of adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBBAP post-TAVI is a feasible and safe pacing strategy, demonstrating favorable electrophysiological and clinical outcomes over 1-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1059-1068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. A Single Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Paula Vela-Martín, Juan Francisco Oteo, Eusebio Garcia-Izquierdo, Carlos Arellano-Serrano, Alvaro Lorente-Ros, Melodie Segura-Dominguez, Arturo Garcia-Touchard, María Del Trigo, Jose Antonio Fernandez-Diaz, Victor Castro-Urda\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Permanent pacing after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) causes higher rates of death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may mitigate these adverse events, although experience is limited yet.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes of LBBAP after TAVI during the first year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center, retrospective observational study of patients who underwent LBBAP after TAVI between January 2020 and December 2023. Indication for permanent pacing, procedural details, LVEF and NTproBNP were assessed at implantation. Changes in electrophysiological parameters, LVEF, NtproBNP and adverse clinical events were evaluated at 1 year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 patients underwent LBBAP after TAVI, primarily due to pathologycal eletrophysiological study (44.9%) or complete/high degree atrioventricular block (42.9%). LBBAP reduced QRS duration post-TAVI (147.1 ± 26.4 ms vs. 119.6 ± 12.6 ms, p < 0.001). Acute complications occurred in 10.2% of patients, resolving during hospitalization. During follow-up (15.6 ± 7.0 months), improvement in capture threshold and reduction in ventricular lead impedance were observed. NTproBNP levels decreased significantly, while LVEF remained stable (61.8% [52.0-67.2] vs. 59.0% [51.0-66.0], p = 0.357). Notably, the six patients with baseline LVEF < 40% showed significant LVEF improvement. A total of 12.2% of patients were hospitalized for HF and 12.2% died (half of them due to cardiovascular causes). Multivariate analysis identified atrial fibrillation as the sole predictor of adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBBAP post-TAVI is a feasible and safe pacing strategy, demonstrating favorable electrophysiological and clinical outcomes over 1-year follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1059-1068\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后永久性起搏导致更高的死亡率、心力衰竭住院率和左心室射血分数(LVEF)下降。尽管经验有限,但左束分支区域起搏(LBBAP)可能减轻这些不良事件。目的:探讨TAVI术后1年随访期间LBBAP的可行性、安全性及临床效果。方法:对2020年1月至2023年12月TAVI术后行LBBAP的患者进行单中心、回顾性观察研究。植入时评估永久性起搏适应证、手术细节、LVEF和NTproBNP。随访1年,评估电生理参数、LVEF、NtproBNP及不良临床事件的变化。结果:TAVI术后共49例患者行LBBAP,主要原因是病理电生理研究(44.9%)或完全/高度房室传导阻滞(42.9%)。LBBAP减少tavi后QRS持续时间(147.1±26.4 ms vs. 119.6±12.6 ms, p < 0.001)。10.2%的患者出现急性并发症,住院期间缓解。在随访期间(15.6±7.0个月),观察到捕获阈值的改善和心室导联阻抗的降低。NTproBNP水平明显下降,而LVEF保持稳定(61.8% [52.0-67.2]vs. 59.0% [51.0-66.0], p = 0.357)。值得注意的是,6例基线LVEF < 40%的患者LVEF明显改善。共有12.2%的患者因心衰住院,12.2%的患者死亡(其中一半是由于心血管原因)。多变量分析确定心房颤动是不良结局的唯一预测因子。结论:LBBAP是一种可行且安全的起搏策略,在1年的随访中显示出良好的电生理和临床结果。
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. A Single Center Experience.
Background: Permanent pacing after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) causes higher rates of death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may mitigate these adverse events, although experience is limited yet.
Objective: To describe the feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes of LBBAP after TAVI during the first year of follow-up.
Methods: Single-center, retrospective observational study of patients who underwent LBBAP after TAVI between January 2020 and December 2023. Indication for permanent pacing, procedural details, LVEF and NTproBNP were assessed at implantation. Changes in electrophysiological parameters, LVEF, NtproBNP and adverse clinical events were evaluated at 1 year follow-up.
Results: A total of 49 patients underwent LBBAP after TAVI, primarily due to pathologycal eletrophysiological study (44.9%) or complete/high degree atrioventricular block (42.9%). LBBAP reduced QRS duration post-TAVI (147.1 ± 26.4 ms vs. 119.6 ± 12.6 ms, p < 0.001). Acute complications occurred in 10.2% of patients, resolving during hospitalization. During follow-up (15.6 ± 7.0 months), improvement in capture threshold and reduction in ventricular lead impedance were observed. NTproBNP levels decreased significantly, while LVEF remained stable (61.8% [52.0-67.2] vs. 59.0% [51.0-66.0], p = 0.357). Notably, the six patients with baseline LVEF < 40% showed significant LVEF improvement. A total of 12.2% of patients were hospitalized for HF and 12.2% died (half of them due to cardiovascular causes). Multivariate analysis identified atrial fibrillation as the sole predictor of adverse outcomes.
Conclusions: LBBAP post-TAVI is a feasible and safe pacing strategy, demonstrating favorable electrophysiological and clinical outcomes over 1-year follow-up.