{"title":"低水平激光治疗对常规局麻注射患者疼痛感知和焦虑水平的影响。","authors":"Lalasa Gaddam, Deepa Anumala, Kishore Kumar Katuri, Divya Pedapudi, Shaik Shazia Begum, Ramanarayana Boyapati","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2025.25.4.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of dental practice is to ensure painless treatments. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Low-level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in reducing pain perception and anxiety associated with conventional local anesthetic injections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized, single-blind, split-mouth study involving 36 participants divided into two groups. Group I underwent LLLT prior to local anesthesia injection, whereas Group II underwent the procedure without laser activation. Anxiety levels were measured using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and pain was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale (WBFRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 22 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Post-intervention analysis of the HAM-A scores showed a reduction in anxiety levels following LLLT, with mild anxiety increasing from 52.8% to 69.44%, and moderate anxiety decreasing from 47.2% to 30.56%. In terms of pain assessment, VAS scores revealed that 38.9% of patients in Group I reported no pain compared to 0% of patients in Group II. Moderate pain was reported by 50% of patients in Group I and 75% of patients in Group II, while severe pain was reported by 11.1% and 25% of patients, respectively. Pain distribution (WBFRS) showed that 63.9% of patients in Group I reported no pain versus 0% of patients in Group II. Little pain was experienced by 36.1% of Group I and 58.3% of Group II patients, whereas 41.7% of Group II patients reported slightly more pain. Statistical comparison showed that Group I had significantly lower mean VAS (1.72 ± 0.659) and WBFRS (1.36 ± 0.487) scores than Group II (VAS: 2.25 ± 0.439; WBFRS: 2.42 ± 0.500), with both results being statistically significant (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLLT was effective in reducing pain associated with injections. It can be used successfully to manage procedures that patients commonly perceive as painful, thereby providing a natural analgesic effect. Additionally, LLLT contributes to creating positive treatment experiences, which play a key role in fostering a long-term, trusting relationship between the patient and clinician.</p>","PeriodicalId":94330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"25 4","pages":"263-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of low-level laser therapy on pain perception and anxiety levels in conventional local anesthesia injection.\",\"authors\":\"Lalasa Gaddam, Deepa Anumala, Kishore Kumar Katuri, Divya Pedapudi, Shaik Shazia Begum, Ramanarayana Boyapati\",\"doi\":\"10.17245/jdapm.2025.25.4.263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of dental practice is to ensure painless treatments. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Low-level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in reducing pain perception and anxiety associated with conventional local anesthetic injections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized, single-blind, split-mouth study involving 36 participants divided into two groups. Group I underwent LLLT prior to local anesthesia injection, whereas Group II underwent the procedure without laser activation. Anxiety levels were measured using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and pain was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale (WBFRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 22 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Post-intervention analysis of the HAM-A scores showed a reduction in anxiety levels following LLLT, with mild anxiety increasing from 52.8% to 69.44%, and moderate anxiety decreasing from 47.2% to 30.56%. In terms of pain assessment, VAS scores revealed that 38.9% of patients in Group I reported no pain compared to 0% of patients in Group II. Moderate pain was reported by 50% of patients in Group I and 75% of patients in Group II, while severe pain was reported by 11.1% and 25% of patients, respectively. Pain distribution (WBFRS) showed that 63.9% of patients in Group I reported no pain versus 0% of patients in Group II. Little pain was experienced by 36.1% of Group I and 58.3% of Group II patients, whereas 41.7% of Group II patients reported slightly more pain. Statistical comparison showed that Group I had significantly lower mean VAS (1.72 ± 0.659) and WBFRS (1.36 ± 0.487) scores than Group II (VAS: 2.25 ± 0.439; WBFRS: 2.42 ± 0.500), with both results being statistically significant (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLLT was effective in reducing pain associated with injections. It can be used successfully to manage procedures that patients commonly perceive as painful, thereby providing a natural analgesic effect. Additionally, LLLT contributes to creating positive treatment experiences, which play a key role in fostering a long-term, trusting relationship between the patient and clinician.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"263-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2025.25.4.263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2025.25.4.263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of low-level laser therapy on pain perception and anxiety levels in conventional local anesthesia injection.
Background: The goal of dental practice is to ensure painless treatments. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Low-level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in reducing pain perception and anxiety associated with conventional local anesthetic injections.
Methods: This was a randomized, single-blind, split-mouth study involving 36 participants divided into two groups. Group I underwent LLLT prior to local anesthesia injection, whereas Group II underwent the procedure without laser activation. Anxiety levels were measured using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and pain was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale (WBFRS).
Results: Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 22 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Post-intervention analysis of the HAM-A scores showed a reduction in anxiety levels following LLLT, with mild anxiety increasing from 52.8% to 69.44%, and moderate anxiety decreasing from 47.2% to 30.56%. In terms of pain assessment, VAS scores revealed that 38.9% of patients in Group I reported no pain compared to 0% of patients in Group II. Moderate pain was reported by 50% of patients in Group I and 75% of patients in Group II, while severe pain was reported by 11.1% and 25% of patients, respectively. Pain distribution (WBFRS) showed that 63.9% of patients in Group I reported no pain versus 0% of patients in Group II. Little pain was experienced by 36.1% of Group I and 58.3% of Group II patients, whereas 41.7% of Group II patients reported slightly more pain. Statistical comparison showed that Group I had significantly lower mean VAS (1.72 ± 0.659) and WBFRS (1.36 ± 0.487) scores than Group II (VAS: 2.25 ± 0.439; WBFRS: 2.42 ± 0.500), with both results being statistically significant (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: LLLT was effective in reducing pain associated with injections. It can be used successfully to manage procedures that patients commonly perceive as painful, thereby providing a natural analgesic effect. Additionally, LLLT contributes to creating positive treatment experiences, which play a key role in fostering a long-term, trusting relationship between the patient and clinician.