评估远程保健和基于文本的干预措施对高危饮酒者:可行性和有效性的试点研究。

IF 1.9 0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jon Morgenstern , Svetlana Levak , Sean P. Madden , Alexis Kuerbis , Fredrick Muench
{"title":"评估远程保健和基于文本的干预措施对高危饮酒者:可行性和有效性的试点研究。","authors":"Jon Morgenstern ,&nbsp;Svetlana Levak ,&nbsp;Sean P. Madden ,&nbsp;Alexis Kuerbis ,&nbsp;Fredrick Muench","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>At-risk drinking refers to when individuals drink above the recommended guidelines for safe drinking without meeting criteria for severe alcohol use disorder. At-risk drinking is a prevalent, costly public health problem. Effective face-to-face brief interventions for at-risk drinking exist but are not widely available. Digital interventions hold promise to increase access to care and improve treatment for at-risk drinkers.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This pilot study examined the feasibility and efficacy of a fully remote digital alcohol reduction support service for at-risk drinkers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants (N = 163; mean age = 46.2 years, 59.5 % female) were recruited via a website and could select between two 8-week interventions: alcohol adaptive text messaging (Text Support, n = 118; 72.4 %) or a hybrid intervention (Coaching, n = 45; 27.6 %) that combined a brief, alcohol behavioral telehealth therapy with digital tools.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants selecting Text Support reported significantly lower levels of alcohol consumption, other indicators of alcohol severity, and were significantly more likely to endorse moderation (48.3 % versus 24.4 %) and less likely to endorse abstinence (10.2 % versus 28.9 %) as a drinking goal relative to participants selecting Coaching. Participants across conditions reported significantly reduced drinking from baseline to the end of the 8-week intervention period. However, low compliance with outcome measurement limited the efficacy evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Overall, findings support the feasibility and pilot efficacy of the hybrid intervention. In addition, findings highlight the heterogeneity of at-risk drinkers and suggest that a subgroup may prefer a fully automated digital intervention as opposed to one that includes therapist support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 209779"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating telehealth and text-based interventions for at-risk drinkers: A pilot study of feasibility and efficacy\",\"authors\":\"Jon Morgenstern ,&nbsp;Svetlana Levak ,&nbsp;Sean P. Madden ,&nbsp;Alexis Kuerbis ,&nbsp;Fredrick Muench\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>At-risk drinking refers to when individuals drink above the recommended guidelines for safe drinking without meeting criteria for severe alcohol use disorder. At-risk drinking is a prevalent, costly public health problem. Effective face-to-face brief interventions for at-risk drinking exist but are not widely available. Digital interventions hold promise to increase access to care and improve treatment for at-risk drinkers.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This pilot study examined the feasibility and efficacy of a fully remote digital alcohol reduction support service for at-risk drinkers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants (N = 163; mean age = 46.2 years, 59.5 % female) were recruited via a website and could select between two 8-week interventions: alcohol adaptive text messaging (Text Support, n = 118; 72.4 %) or a hybrid intervention (Coaching, n = 45; 27.6 %) that combined a brief, alcohol behavioral telehealth therapy with digital tools.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants selecting Text Support reported significantly lower levels of alcohol consumption, other indicators of alcohol severity, and were significantly more likely to endorse moderation (48.3 % versus 24.4 %) and less likely to endorse abstinence (10.2 % versus 28.9 %) as a drinking goal relative to participants selecting Coaching. Participants across conditions reported significantly reduced drinking from baseline to the end of the 8-week intervention period. However, low compliance with outcome measurement limited the efficacy evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Overall, findings support the feasibility and pilot efficacy of the hybrid intervention. In addition, findings highlight the heterogeneity of at-risk drinkers and suggest that a subgroup may prefer a fully automated digital intervention as opposed to one that includes therapist support.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 209779\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925001584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925001584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高危饮酒是指个人饮酒量超过安全饮酒推荐指南,但没有达到严重酒精使用障碍的标准。高危饮酒是一个普遍存在的、代价高昂的公共卫生问题。存在针对高危饮酒人群的有效面对面简短干预措施,但尚未广泛使用。数字干预有望增加对高危饮酒者的护理和治疗。目的:本试点研究考察了为高危饮酒者提供全远程数字酒精减少支持服务的可行性和有效性。方法:研究对象(N = 163;平均年龄 = 46.2 岁,59.5% %为女性)通过网站招募,可以选择两种为期8周的干预措施:酒精自适应短信(文本支持,n = 118;72.4 %)或混合干预(Coaching, n = 45;27.6 %),将简短的酒精行为远程医疗治疗与数字工具相结合。结果:选择文本支持的参与者报告的酒精消费水平和其他酒精严重程度指标明显较低,并且与选择指导的参与者相比,更有可能支持适度饮酒(48.3 %对24.4 %),更不可能支持戒酒(10. %对28.9 %)作为饮酒目标。从基线到8周干预期结束时,各种情况下的参与者都报告饮酒显著减少。然而,低依从性的结果测量限制了疗效评价。结论:总体而言,研究结果支持混合干预的可行性和试点效果。此外,研究结果强调了高危饮酒者的异质性,并表明一个亚组可能更喜欢全自动的数字干预,而不是包括治疗师支持的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating telehealth and text-based interventions for at-risk drinkers: A pilot study of feasibility and efficacy

Background

At-risk drinking refers to when individuals drink above the recommended guidelines for safe drinking without meeting criteria for severe alcohol use disorder. At-risk drinking is a prevalent, costly public health problem. Effective face-to-face brief interventions for at-risk drinking exist but are not widely available. Digital interventions hold promise to increase access to care and improve treatment for at-risk drinkers.

Objective

This pilot study examined the feasibility and efficacy of a fully remote digital alcohol reduction support service for at-risk drinkers.

Methods

Participants (N = 163; mean age = 46.2 years, 59.5 % female) were recruited via a website and could select between two 8-week interventions: alcohol adaptive text messaging (Text Support, n = 118; 72.4 %) or a hybrid intervention (Coaching, n = 45; 27.6 %) that combined a brief, alcohol behavioral telehealth therapy with digital tools.

Results

Participants selecting Text Support reported significantly lower levels of alcohol consumption, other indicators of alcohol severity, and were significantly more likely to endorse moderation (48.3 % versus 24.4 %) and less likely to endorse abstinence (10.2 % versus 28.9 %) as a drinking goal relative to participants selecting Coaching. Participants across conditions reported significantly reduced drinking from baseline to the end of the 8-week intervention period. However, low compliance with outcome measurement limited the efficacy evaluation.

Conclusion

Overall, findings support the feasibility and pilot efficacy of the hybrid intervention. In addition, findings highlight the heterogeneity of at-risk drinkers and suggest that a subgroup may prefer a fully automated digital intervention as opposed to one that includes therapist support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信