股骨颈骨折内固定失败后全髋关节置换术与初次全髋关节置换术并发症的比较:荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Haotian Yin, Yixiang Zhang, Wenbo Hou, Lei Wang, Xin Fu, Jun Liu
{"title":"股骨颈骨折内固定失败后全髋关节置换术与初次全髋关节置换术并发症的比较:荟萃分析。","authors":"Haotian Yin, Yixiang Zhang, Wenbo Hou, Lei Wang, Xin Fu, Jun Liu","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2025.2230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this meta-analysis, we discuss the complication rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) following failed internal fixation (IF) of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) versus primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched for eligible publications published prior to December 2024. The search terms included \"femoral neck fracture\", \"internal fixation failure\", and \"total hip arthroplasty\". The mean difference (MD) and risk difference (RD) were used as combined variables, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were chosen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six non-randomized-controlled clinical trials comprising 1,301 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled data revealed statistically significant differences in postoperative deep infection rates (RD=0.04; 95% CI: 0.01- 0.08; p=0.009), periprosthetic fractures (RD=0.03; 95% CI: 0.00-0.05; p=0.03), and reoperation rates (RD=0.07; 95% CI: 0.03-0.11; p=0.0002) between the cTHA and pTHA groups. However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative dislocations (RD=0.05; 95% CI: -0.03-0.13; p=0.19), deep vein thrombosis (RD= -0.01; 95% CI: -0.04-0.03; p=0.77), superficial infections (RD=0.02; 95% CI: -0.02-0.06; p=0.37), or revision surgeries (RD=0.02; 95% CI: -0.01-0.05; p=0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to pTHA, cTHA following failed IF of FNFs was associated with higher deep infection, periprosthetic fractures, and reoperation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"36 3","pages":"479-488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of complications between total hip arthroplasty following failed internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Haotian Yin, Yixiang Zhang, Wenbo Hou, Lei Wang, Xin Fu, Jun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.52312/jdrs.2025.2230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this meta-analysis, we discuss the complication rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) following failed internal fixation (IF) of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) versus primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched for eligible publications published prior to December 2024. The search terms included \\\"femoral neck fracture\\\", \\\"internal fixation failure\\\", and \\\"total hip arthroplasty\\\". The mean difference (MD) and risk difference (RD) were used as combined variables, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were chosen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six non-randomized-controlled clinical trials comprising 1,301 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled data revealed statistically significant differences in postoperative deep infection rates (RD=0.04; 95% CI: 0.01- 0.08; p=0.009), periprosthetic fractures (RD=0.03; 95% CI: 0.00-0.05; p=0.03), and reoperation rates (RD=0.07; 95% CI: 0.03-0.11; p=0.0002) between the cTHA and pTHA groups. However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative dislocations (RD=0.05; 95% CI: -0.03-0.13; p=0.19), deep vein thrombosis (RD= -0.01; 95% CI: -0.04-0.03; p=0.77), superficial infections (RD=0.02; 95% CI: -0.02-0.06; p=0.37), or revision surgeries (RD=0.02; 95% CI: -0.01-0.05; p=0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to pTHA, cTHA following failed IF of FNFs was associated with higher deep infection, periprosthetic fractures, and reoperation rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint diseases and related surgery\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"479-488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456329/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint diseases and related surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2025.2230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2025.2230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在本荟萃分析中,我们讨论了股骨颈骨折(FNFs)内固定(IF)失败后转行全髋关节置换术(cTHA)与初次全髋关节置换术(pTHA)的并发症发生率。材料和方法:检索Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、PubMed、Embase和Science Direct数据库,检索2024年12月之前发表的符合条件的出版物。搜索词包括“股骨颈骨折”、“内固定失败”和“全髋关节置换术”。以平均差(MD)和风险差(RD)为组合变量,选取95%置信区间(ci)。结果:六项非随机对照临床试验包括1,301例患者纳入本荟萃分析。合并数据显示,两组术后深度感染率差异有统计学意义(RD=0.04;95% ci: 0.01- 0.08;p=0.009),假体周围骨折(RD=0.03;95% ci: 0.00-0.05;p=0.03),再手术率(RD=0.07;95% ci: 0.03-0.11;p=0.0002)。然而,两组术后脱位发生率无显著差异(RD=0.05;95% ci: -0.03-0.13;p=0.19),深静脉血栓形成(RD= -0.01;95% ci: -0.04-0.03;p=0.77),浅表感染(RD=0.02;95% ci: -0.02-0.06;p=0.37)或翻修手术(RD=0.02;95% ci: -0.01-0.05;p = 0.13)。结论:与pTHA相比,fnf IF失败后的cTHA与更高的深度感染、假体周围骨折和再手术率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of complications between total hip arthroplasty following failed internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis.

Comparison of complications between total hip arthroplasty following failed internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis.

Comparison of complications between total hip arthroplasty following failed internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis.

Comparison of complications between total hip arthroplasty following failed internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis.

Objectives: In this meta-analysis, we discuss the complication rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) following failed internal fixation (IF) of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) versus primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA).

Materials and methods: The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched for eligible publications published prior to December 2024. The search terms included "femoral neck fracture", "internal fixation failure", and "total hip arthroplasty". The mean difference (MD) and risk difference (RD) were used as combined variables, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were chosen.

Results: Six non-randomized-controlled clinical trials comprising 1,301 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled data revealed statistically significant differences in postoperative deep infection rates (RD=0.04; 95% CI: 0.01- 0.08; p=0.009), periprosthetic fractures (RD=0.03; 95% CI: 0.00-0.05; p=0.03), and reoperation rates (RD=0.07; 95% CI: 0.03-0.11; p=0.0002) between the cTHA and pTHA groups. However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative dislocations (RD=0.05; 95% CI: -0.03-0.13; p=0.19), deep vein thrombosis (RD= -0.01; 95% CI: -0.04-0.03; p=0.77), superficial infections (RD=0.02; 95% CI: -0.02-0.06; p=0.37), or revision surgeries (RD=0.02; 95% CI: -0.01-0.05; p=0.13).

Conclusion: Compared to pTHA, cTHA following failed IF of FNFs was associated with higher deep infection, periprosthetic fractures, and reoperation rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信