Ugur Yuzuguldu, Bilge Kagan Yilmaz, Ibrahim Ethem Butuner, Murat Yesil, Gokhan Maralcan
{"title":"髋臼粗隆距离测量作为半关节置换术患者腿长差异的新方法。","authors":"Ugur Yuzuguldu, Bilge Kagan Yilmaz, Ibrahim Ethem Butuner, Murat Yesil, Gokhan Maralcan","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2025.2285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the interobserver reliability and interobserver reproducibility of radiographic acetabulotrochanteric distance (ATD) measurement and to investigate its accuracy by comparing it with conventional radiographic methods used in leg length discrepancy (LLD) measurement.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between January 2017 and January 2022, a total of 97 patients (39 males, 58 females; mean age: 77.8±7.1 years; range, 61 to 91 years) who underwent pelvic radiographic evaluation and hemiarthroplasty (HA) due to femoral neck fracture were retrospectively analyzed. For ATD measurement, the distance between the line connecting the upper cartilage of the acetabulum (AC) and the extreme point of the greater trochanter (GT) was used. The AC-GT measurement on both sides was compared with bottom of the ischial tuberosities-lesser trochanter (BI-LT), center of the femoral head-BI (CH-BI), inferior acetabular teardrops-LT (IT-LT) measurements. The agreement between the methods was examined with the intraclass correlation coefficient (CCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the AC-GT & BI-LT, AC-GT & BI-CH methods, there were very strong (ICC: 0.75), moderate (ICC: 0.69) and acceptable (ICC: 0.33) agreements, respectively. Significant agreement was found between all measurements (p<0.001). A positive correlation was detected in the correlation analysis of all measurements (p<0.001). Intra- and interobserver agreement for ATD measurement (AC-GT) was excellent (ICC: >0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ATD measurement correlates well with known measurement techniques on pelvic radiography and can be used as an alternative to this method. It has excellent intra- and interobserver agreements. This method can predict LLD after HA, but does not consider other length differences in the lower limbs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"36 3","pages":"675-682"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiographic acetabulotrochanteric distance measurement as a novel method for determining leg length discrepancy in patients with hemiarthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Ugur Yuzuguldu, Bilge Kagan Yilmaz, Ibrahim Ethem Butuner, Murat Yesil, Gokhan Maralcan\",\"doi\":\"10.52312/jdrs.2025.2285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the interobserver reliability and interobserver reproducibility of radiographic acetabulotrochanteric distance (ATD) measurement and to investigate its accuracy by comparing it with conventional radiographic methods used in leg length discrepancy (LLD) measurement.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between January 2017 and January 2022, a total of 97 patients (39 males, 58 females; mean age: 77.8±7.1 years; range, 61 to 91 years) who underwent pelvic radiographic evaluation and hemiarthroplasty (HA) due to femoral neck fracture were retrospectively analyzed. For ATD measurement, the distance between the line connecting the upper cartilage of the acetabulum (AC) and the extreme point of the greater trochanter (GT) was used. The AC-GT measurement on both sides was compared with bottom of the ischial tuberosities-lesser trochanter (BI-LT), center of the femoral head-BI (CH-BI), inferior acetabular teardrops-LT (IT-LT) measurements. The agreement between the methods was examined with the intraclass correlation coefficient (CCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the AC-GT & BI-LT, AC-GT & BI-CH methods, there were very strong (ICC: 0.75), moderate (ICC: 0.69) and acceptable (ICC: 0.33) agreements, respectively. Significant agreement was found between all measurements (p<0.001). A positive correlation was detected in the correlation analysis of all measurements (p<0.001). Intra- and interobserver agreement for ATD measurement (AC-GT) was excellent (ICC: >0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ATD measurement correlates well with known measurement techniques on pelvic radiography and can be used as an alternative to this method. It has excellent intra- and interobserver agreements. This method can predict LLD after HA, but does not consider other length differences in the lower limbs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint diseases and related surgery\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"675-682\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456366/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint diseases and related surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2025.2285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2025.2285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评价放射学测量髋臼粗隆距离(ATD)的观察者间可靠性和观察者间可重复性,并通过与常规放射学测量腿长差异(LLD)的方法进行比较,探讨其准确性。患者与方法:2017年1月至2022年1月,共97例患者(男39例,女58例;平均年龄:77.8±7.1岁;回顾性分析了因股骨颈骨折接受骨盆x线检查和半关节置换术(HA)的患者(年龄61 - 91岁)。测量ATD时,使用连接髋臼上软骨(AC)和大转子(GT)端点的线之间的距离。将AC-GT与坐骨结节底部-小粗隆(BI-LT)、股骨头中心- bi (CH-BI)、髋臼下泪滴- lt (IT-LT)测量结果进行比较。用类内相关系数(CCI)检验方法间的一致性。结果:AC-GT与BI-LT、AC-GT与BI-CH方法的一致性分别为非常强(ICC: 0.75)、中等(ICC: 0.69)和可接受(ICC: 0.33)。所有测量结果之间存在显著的一致性(p0.8)。结论:ATD测量与骨盆x线摄影中已知的测量技术具有良好的相关性,可作为该方法的替代方法。它有出色的观察员内部和观察员之间的协议。该方法可预测HA后LLD,但未考虑下肢其他长度差异。
Radiographic acetabulotrochanteric distance measurement as a novel method for determining leg length discrepancy in patients with hemiarthroplasty.
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the interobserver reliability and interobserver reproducibility of radiographic acetabulotrochanteric distance (ATD) measurement and to investigate its accuracy by comparing it with conventional radiographic methods used in leg length discrepancy (LLD) measurement.
Patients and methods: Between January 2017 and January 2022, a total of 97 patients (39 males, 58 females; mean age: 77.8±7.1 years; range, 61 to 91 years) who underwent pelvic radiographic evaluation and hemiarthroplasty (HA) due to femoral neck fracture were retrospectively analyzed. For ATD measurement, the distance between the line connecting the upper cartilage of the acetabulum (AC) and the extreme point of the greater trochanter (GT) was used. The AC-GT measurement on both sides was compared with bottom of the ischial tuberosities-lesser trochanter (BI-LT), center of the femoral head-BI (CH-BI), inferior acetabular teardrops-LT (IT-LT) measurements. The agreement between the methods was examined with the intraclass correlation coefficient (CCI).
Results: According to the AC-GT & BI-LT, AC-GT & BI-CH methods, there were very strong (ICC: 0.75), moderate (ICC: 0.69) and acceptable (ICC: 0.33) agreements, respectively. Significant agreement was found between all measurements (p<0.001). A positive correlation was detected in the correlation analysis of all measurements (p<0.001). Intra- and interobserver agreement for ATD measurement (AC-GT) was excellent (ICC: >0.8).
Conclusion: The ATD measurement correlates well with known measurement techniques on pelvic radiography and can be used as an alternative to this method. It has excellent intra- and interobserver agreements. This method can predict LLD after HA, but does not consider other length differences in the lower limbs.