{"title":"体恤关怀的组织干预：医疗保健专业人员的观点。定性证据综合。","authors":"Lydia Tunstall, Philip Molyneux, Tim Alexander","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to global outcries of poor healthcare, organisational interventions have been implemented with the aim of promoting compassionate care. An overall synthesis of qualitative data, including the perspectives of healthcare staff who have attended interventions, can establish 'what works' and inform future interventions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To synthesise existing research exploring how healthcare staff experience organisational interventions for compassionate care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative evidence synthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods and data sources: </strong>A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted in August 2023. Five databases were searched: MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo and APA PsycArticles. Articles met the following criteria: (a) reported on the experiences of healthcare staff who had participated in organisational interventions for compassionate care, (b) taken place in a healthcare setting, (c) use of a qualitative or mixed-methods methodology, (d) published in English and (e) published since 2010. A thematic synthesis was conducted using NVivo software to synthesise findings. Data from the complete 'findings/results' sections were included in the synthesis. The final search protocol and search strategy were registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023472404) and are reported using the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen qualitative or mixed-methods studies were included in the review, encapsulating the experiences of healthcare staff across eight countries. Four themes were identified: (1) holding back, (2) humanising healthcare, (3) values are instilled and (4) sustainability is important.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Organisational interventions for compassionate health care are valued and appreciated by healthcare staff and foster reflection and connection. Interventions facilitate clinical creativity, improve staff well-being and strengthen communication between staff.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The implementation of organisational interventions for compassionate care should be encouraged in healthcare settings. Interventions that consider organisational cultures are driven by organisational values and are embedded with sustainability in mind can improve staff well-being and positively impact the provision of patient care.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organisational Interventions for Compassionate Care: The Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals. A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Lydia Tunstall, Philip Molyneux, Tim Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.70073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to global outcries of poor healthcare, organisational interventions have been implemented with the aim of promoting compassionate care. An overall synthesis of qualitative data, including the perspectives of healthcare staff who have attended interventions, can establish 'what works' and inform future interventions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To synthesise existing research exploring how healthcare staff experience organisational interventions for compassionate care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative evidence synthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods and data sources: </strong>A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted in August 2023. Five databases were searched: MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo and APA PsycArticles. Articles met the following criteria: (a) reported on the experiences of healthcare staff who had participated in organisational interventions for compassionate care, (b) taken place in a healthcare setting, (c) use of a qualitative or mixed-methods methodology, (d) published in English and (e) published since 2010. A thematic synthesis was conducted using NVivo software to synthesise findings. Data from the complete 'findings/results' sections were included in the synthesis. The final search protocol and search strategy were registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023472404) and are reported using the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen qualitative or mixed-methods studies were included in the review, encapsulating the experiences of healthcare staff across eight countries. Four themes were identified: (1) holding back, (2) humanising healthcare, (3) values are instilled and (4) sustainability is important.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Organisational interventions for compassionate health care are valued and appreciated by healthcare staff and foster reflection and connection. Interventions facilitate clinical creativity, improve staff well-being and strengthen communication between staff.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The implementation of organisational interventions for compassionate care should be encouraged in healthcare settings. Interventions that consider organisational cultures are driven by organisational values and are embedded with sustainability in mind can improve staff well-being and positively impact the provision of patient care.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this review.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Organisational Interventions for Compassionate Care: The Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals. A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.
Background: In response to global outcries of poor healthcare, organisational interventions have been implemented with the aim of promoting compassionate care. An overall synthesis of qualitative data, including the perspectives of healthcare staff who have attended interventions, can establish 'what works' and inform future interventions.
Aims: To synthesise existing research exploring how healthcare staff experience organisational interventions for compassionate care.
Design: Qualitative evidence synthesis.
Methods and data sources: A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted in August 2023. Five databases were searched: MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo and APA PsycArticles. Articles met the following criteria: (a) reported on the experiences of healthcare staff who had participated in organisational interventions for compassionate care, (b) taken place in a healthcare setting, (c) use of a qualitative or mixed-methods methodology, (d) published in English and (e) published since 2010. A thematic synthesis was conducted using NVivo software to synthesise findings. Data from the complete 'findings/results' sections were included in the synthesis. The final search protocol and search strategy were registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023472404) and are reported using the PRISMA guidelines.
Results: Eighteen qualitative or mixed-methods studies were included in the review, encapsulating the experiences of healthcare staff across eight countries. Four themes were identified: (1) holding back, (2) humanising healthcare, (3) values are instilled and (4) sustainability is important.
Conclusion: Organisational interventions for compassionate health care are valued and appreciated by healthcare staff and foster reflection and connection. Interventions facilitate clinical creativity, improve staff well-being and strengthen communication between staff.
Implications: The implementation of organisational interventions for compassionate care should be encouraged in healthcare settings. Interventions that consider organisational cultures are driven by organisational values and are embedded with sustainability in mind can improve staff well-being and positively impact the provision of patient care.
Reporting method: PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this review.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
