Ranjani K Paradise, Simeon D Kimmel, Alykhan Nurani, Jeff Desmarais, Shannon O'Malley, Alexander Y Walley, Andres Hoyos-Cespedes, Jaylen Clarke, Sunday Taylor, Daniel Dooley, Angela R Bazzi
{"title":"建立联系:药物过量幸存者和专业服务提供者对药物过量后立即护理的看法。","authors":"Ranjani K Paradise, Simeon D Kimmel, Alykhan Nurani, Jeff Desmarais, Shannon O'Malley, Alexander Y Walley, Andres Hoyos-Cespedes, Jaylen Clarke, Sunday Taylor, Daniel Dooley, Angela R Bazzi","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonfatal overdose is a risk factor for future fatal overdose and represents a critical touchpoint for engaging survivors and making connections to treatment and harm reduction resources. The aim of this study was to understand survivors' experiences and preferences in the immediate post-overdose period, and to elucidate survivors' and professionals' perspectives on improving care provision at this interaction point.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2020-2021, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with opioid overdose survivors (n = 59) and professionals (n = 28) who respond to overdoses or interact with survivors in Boston, MA. When reviewing coded data early in the analytical process, we identified a strong emphasis on the importance of immediate post-overdose experiences in influencing engagement in care. Subsequent in-depth analysis then identified common experiences and factors related to service engagement in this acute time period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 59 overdose survivors, most identified as Black or Latinx (70 %) due to purposive sampling. Most were also unhoused (75 %) and reported at least three past-year overdoses (69 %). Many participants described intense physical pain and/or emotional distress immediately following overdose reversal, which reduced their desire and ability to engage with service providers. Several experienced disrespect and stigma from overdose responders, which negatively impacted their experience. However, some participants expressed wanting to be offered services immediately post-overdose, stating that providers should always \"extend the branch\". Professionals reinforced survivors' perspectives, explaining how trauma and stigma reduce survivors' willingness to accept service information and referrals; they also highlighted systemic challenges in standard overdose response processes that impede effective engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To better engage survivors, overdose response processes should prioritize survivors' physical and emotional comfort and seek to build trust by utilizing person-centered, trauma-informed, and non-stigmatizing approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"145 ","pages":"104948"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building connection: overdose survivors' and professional service providers' perspectives on immediate post-overdose care.\",\"authors\":\"Ranjani K Paradise, Simeon D Kimmel, Alykhan Nurani, Jeff Desmarais, Shannon O'Malley, Alexander Y Walley, Andres Hoyos-Cespedes, Jaylen Clarke, Sunday Taylor, Daniel Dooley, Angela R Bazzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonfatal overdose is a risk factor for future fatal overdose and represents a critical touchpoint for engaging survivors and making connections to treatment and harm reduction resources. The aim of this study was to understand survivors' experiences and preferences in the immediate post-overdose period, and to elucidate survivors' and professionals' perspectives on improving care provision at this interaction point.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2020-2021, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with opioid overdose survivors (n = 59) and professionals (n = 28) who respond to overdoses or interact with survivors in Boston, MA. When reviewing coded data early in the analytical process, we identified a strong emphasis on the importance of immediate post-overdose experiences in influencing engagement in care. Subsequent in-depth analysis then identified common experiences and factors related to service engagement in this acute time period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 59 overdose survivors, most identified as Black or Latinx (70 %) due to purposive sampling. Most were also unhoused (75 %) and reported at least three past-year overdoses (69 %). Many participants described intense physical pain and/or emotional distress immediately following overdose reversal, which reduced their desire and ability to engage with service providers. Several experienced disrespect and stigma from overdose responders, which negatively impacted their experience. However, some participants expressed wanting to be offered services immediately post-overdose, stating that providers should always \\\"extend the branch\\\". Professionals reinforced survivors' perspectives, explaining how trauma and stigma reduce survivors' willingness to accept service information and referrals; they also highlighted systemic challenges in standard overdose response processes that impede effective engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To better engage survivors, overdose response processes should prioritize survivors' physical and emotional comfort and seek to build trust by utilizing person-centered, trauma-informed, and non-stigmatizing approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"145 \",\"pages\":\"104948\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104948\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104948","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Building connection: overdose survivors' and professional service providers' perspectives on immediate post-overdose care.
Background: Nonfatal overdose is a risk factor for future fatal overdose and represents a critical touchpoint for engaging survivors and making connections to treatment and harm reduction resources. The aim of this study was to understand survivors' experiences and preferences in the immediate post-overdose period, and to elucidate survivors' and professionals' perspectives on improving care provision at this interaction point.
Methods: In 2020-2021, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with opioid overdose survivors (n = 59) and professionals (n = 28) who respond to overdoses or interact with survivors in Boston, MA. When reviewing coded data early in the analytical process, we identified a strong emphasis on the importance of immediate post-overdose experiences in influencing engagement in care. Subsequent in-depth analysis then identified common experiences and factors related to service engagement in this acute time period.
Results: Among 59 overdose survivors, most identified as Black or Latinx (70 %) due to purposive sampling. Most were also unhoused (75 %) and reported at least three past-year overdoses (69 %). Many participants described intense physical pain and/or emotional distress immediately following overdose reversal, which reduced their desire and ability to engage with service providers. Several experienced disrespect and stigma from overdose responders, which negatively impacted their experience. However, some participants expressed wanting to be offered services immediately post-overdose, stating that providers should always "extend the branch". Professionals reinforced survivors' perspectives, explaining how trauma and stigma reduce survivors' willingness to accept service information and referrals; they also highlighted systemic challenges in standard overdose response processes that impede effective engagement.
Conclusion: To better engage survivors, overdose response processes should prioritize survivors' physical and emotional comfort and seek to build trust by utilizing person-centered, trauma-informed, and non-stigmatizing approaches.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.