在临床试验中评估参与者对COVID-19症状日记的体验。

IF 2.9 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
T Michelle Brown, Chisom Kanu, Magdalena Harrington
{"title":"在临床试验中评估参与者对COVID-19症状日记的体验。","authors":"T Michelle Brown, Chisom Kanu, Magdalena Harrington","doi":"10.1186/s41687-025-00901-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During a phase 2/3 study of twice-daily nirmatrelvir 300 mg coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg versus placebo for 5 days (NCT05011513), participants reported presence and severity of COVID-19 symptoms using a COVID-19 symptom diary in accordance with FDA guidance. Here, we aimed to evaluate the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items through qualitative interviews as recommended by the FDA. Study participants kept a daily electronic diary to record the presence and severity of 14 COVID-19 symptoms (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, shortness of breath, cough, low energy or tiredness, muscle or body aches, headache, chills/shivering, feeling hot or feverish, nausea, frequency of vomiting, frequency of diarrhea, sense of smell, and sense of taste). They also answered questions regarding 3 global impression items (return to health, return to usual activities, and overall symptom severity). A subset of clinical trial participants was interviewed at study completion to assess content validity of the diary. Overall, 25 participants were interviewed across 10 clinical sites. Each of the 14 symptoms included in the diary were reported by ≥ 1 participant, with low energy/tiredness being reported most frequently (88.0%). Twelve participants (48.0%) reported ≥ 1 symptom that was not captured by the diary, with dizziness being the most common (12.0%). Rates of these symptoms were lower (≤ 12.0%) than the 14 prespecified symptoms included in the diary (16.0-88.0%). Based on participant feedback, all 14 diary items were clear and generally easy to answer using the response scales, and all were interpreted as intended. The 3 global items received similar feedback, although a few participants noted that there were challenges in interpreting the items, describing questions as \"vague\" and \"confusing\", or that responses were too limited; one-third reported having difficulty calculating overall symptom experience for multiple symptoms. Participants reported that the electronic application for the diary and global items was easy to use and enabled the items to be easily completed. Exit interview results support the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items, with the 14 symptoms included in the diary reflecting the most commonly experienced COVID-19 symptoms. NCT05011513; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05011513 .</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing participants' experiences with the COVID-19 symptom diary in a clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"T Michelle Brown, Chisom Kanu, Magdalena Harrington\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41687-025-00901-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During a phase 2/3 study of twice-daily nirmatrelvir 300 mg coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg versus placebo for 5 days (NCT05011513), participants reported presence and severity of COVID-19 symptoms using a COVID-19 symptom diary in accordance with FDA guidance. Here, we aimed to evaluate the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items through qualitative interviews as recommended by the FDA. Study participants kept a daily electronic diary to record the presence and severity of 14 COVID-19 symptoms (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, shortness of breath, cough, low energy or tiredness, muscle or body aches, headache, chills/shivering, feeling hot or feverish, nausea, frequency of vomiting, frequency of diarrhea, sense of smell, and sense of taste). They also answered questions regarding 3 global impression items (return to health, return to usual activities, and overall symptom severity). A subset of clinical trial participants was interviewed at study completion to assess content validity of the diary. Overall, 25 participants were interviewed across 10 clinical sites. Each of the 14 symptoms included in the diary were reported by ≥ 1 participant, with low energy/tiredness being reported most frequently (88.0%). Twelve participants (48.0%) reported ≥ 1 symptom that was not captured by the diary, with dizziness being the most common (12.0%). Rates of these symptoms were lower (≤ 12.0%) than the 14 prespecified symptoms included in the diary (16.0-88.0%). Based on participant feedback, all 14 diary items were clear and generally easy to answer using the response scales, and all were interpreted as intended. The 3 global items received similar feedback, although a few participants noted that there were challenges in interpreting the items, describing questions as \\\"vague\\\" and \\\"confusing\\\", or that responses were too limited; one-third reported having difficulty calculating overall symptom experience for multiple symptoms. Participants reported that the electronic application for the diary and global items was easy to use and enabled the items to be easily completed. Exit interview results support the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items, with the 14 symptoms included in the diary reflecting the most commonly experienced COVID-19 symptoms. NCT05011513; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05011513 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339813/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00901-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00901-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一项2/3期研究中,受试者按照FDA指南使用COVID-19症状日记报告COVID-19症状的存在和严重程度,每日两次,300 mg,与利托那韦(100 mg)联合使用,连续5天(NCT05011513)。在这里,我们旨在通过FDA推荐的定性访谈来评估COVID-19症状日记和全球印象项目的内容效度。研究参与者每天记录一份电子日记,记录14种COVID-19症状的存在和严重程度(鼻塞或流鼻涕、喉咙痛、呼吸急促、咳嗽、精力不足或疲劳、肌肉或身体疼痛、头痛、发冷/发抖、感觉发热或发烧、恶心、呕吐频率、腹泻频率、嗅觉和味觉)。他们还回答了关于3个整体印象项目的问题(恢复健康、恢复正常活动和总体症状严重程度)。一部分临床试验参与者在研究结束时接受了访谈,以评估日记内容的有效性。总的来说,25名参与者在10个临床站点接受了采访。≥1名参与者报告了日记中包含的14种症状中的每一种,其中最常报告的是低能量/疲倦(88.0%)。12名参与者(48.0%)报告了≥1种未被日记记录的症状,其中最常见的是头晕(12.0%)。这些症状的发生率(≤12.0%)低于日记中包含的14种预先指定的症状(16.0-88.0%)。根据参与者的反馈,所有14个日记项目都是清晰的,使用反应量表通常很容易回答,并且所有的解释都是预期的。3个全球性项目得到了类似的反馈,尽管一些与会者指出,在解释这些项目方面存在挑战,将问题描述为“模糊”和“令人困惑”,或者答复过于有限;三分之一的人报告在计算多重症状的总体症状经历方面有困难。与会者报告说,日记和全球项目的电子申请易于使用,使项目易于完成。离职面谈结果支持COVID-19症状日记和整体印象项目的内容有效性,日记中包含的14种症状反映了最常见的COVID-19症状。NCT05011513;https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05011513。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing participants' experiences with the COVID-19 symptom diary in a clinical trial.

During a phase 2/3 study of twice-daily nirmatrelvir 300 mg coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg versus placebo for 5 days (NCT05011513), participants reported presence and severity of COVID-19 symptoms using a COVID-19 symptom diary in accordance with FDA guidance. Here, we aimed to evaluate the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items through qualitative interviews as recommended by the FDA. Study participants kept a daily electronic diary to record the presence and severity of 14 COVID-19 symptoms (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, shortness of breath, cough, low energy or tiredness, muscle or body aches, headache, chills/shivering, feeling hot or feverish, nausea, frequency of vomiting, frequency of diarrhea, sense of smell, and sense of taste). They also answered questions regarding 3 global impression items (return to health, return to usual activities, and overall symptom severity). A subset of clinical trial participants was interviewed at study completion to assess content validity of the diary. Overall, 25 participants were interviewed across 10 clinical sites. Each of the 14 symptoms included in the diary were reported by ≥ 1 participant, with low energy/tiredness being reported most frequently (88.0%). Twelve participants (48.0%) reported ≥ 1 symptom that was not captured by the diary, with dizziness being the most common (12.0%). Rates of these symptoms were lower (≤ 12.0%) than the 14 prespecified symptoms included in the diary (16.0-88.0%). Based on participant feedback, all 14 diary items were clear and generally easy to answer using the response scales, and all were interpreted as intended. The 3 global items received similar feedback, although a few participants noted that there were challenges in interpreting the items, describing questions as "vague" and "confusing", or that responses were too limited; one-third reported having difficulty calculating overall symptom experience for multiple symptoms. Participants reported that the electronic application for the diary and global items was easy to use and enabled the items to be easily completed. Exit interview results support the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items, with the 14 symptoms included in the diary reflecting the most commonly experienced COVID-19 symptoms. NCT05011513; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05011513 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信