T V Nechay, A E Tyagunov, A S Li, A A Pozdnyakova, A G Yuldashev, Z M Alieva
{"title":"[曼海姆腹膜炎指数不能常规用于指导腹膜炎的手术决策]。","authors":"T V Nechay, A E Tyagunov, A S Li, A A Pozdnyakova, A G Yuldashev, Z M Alieva","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202508197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the evidence base of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) for choice of relaparotomy (programmed vs on-demand) in severe peritonitis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was carried out in 3 stages.</p><p><p>1. MPI-based assessment of evidence base of national guidelines «Peritonitis» regarding the choice of relaparotomy (programmed vs on-demand).</p><p><p>2. Statements and recommendations of current foreign guidelines on MPI-based choice of tactics for peritonitis.</p><p><p>3. Systematic review of evidence base of studies that used MPI to determine surgical tactics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The studies listed in national guidelines do not provide evidence of feasibility of MPI as a tool for determining tactics. This index is not mentioned in 3 out of 7 foreign recommendations on abdominal surgical infection. In other recommendations with moderate level of recommendations and low level of evidence, MPI is indicated as a tool for predicting mortality. In 7 retrospective studies not included in recommendations, there was no evidence for advisability of MPI to determine surgical tactics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is currently no evidence base for MPI in choosing programmed or on-demand relaparotomy in case of severe peritonitis. Further high-evidence studies are required to find significant criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 8","pages":"97-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Mannheim Peritonitis Index cannot be routinely used to guide surgical decision-making for peritonitis].\",\"authors\":\"T V Nechay, A E Tyagunov, A S Li, A A Pozdnyakova, A G Yuldashev, Z M Alieva\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/hirurgia202508197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the evidence base of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) for choice of relaparotomy (programmed vs on-demand) in severe peritonitis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was carried out in 3 stages.</p><p><p>1. MPI-based assessment of evidence base of national guidelines «Peritonitis» regarding the choice of relaparotomy (programmed vs on-demand).</p><p><p>2. Statements and recommendations of current foreign guidelines on MPI-based choice of tactics for peritonitis.</p><p><p>3. Systematic review of evidence base of studies that used MPI to determine surgical tactics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The studies listed in national guidelines do not provide evidence of feasibility of MPI as a tool for determining tactics. This index is not mentioned in 3 out of 7 foreign recommendations on abdominal surgical infection. In other recommendations with moderate level of recommendations and low level of evidence, MPI is indicated as a tool for predicting mortality. In 7 retrospective studies not included in recommendations, there was no evidence for advisability of MPI to determine surgical tactics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is currently no evidence base for MPI in choosing programmed or on-demand relaparotomy in case of severe peritonitis. Further high-evidence studies are required to find significant criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"volume\":\" 8\",\"pages\":\"97-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202508197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202508197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[The Mannheim Peritonitis Index cannot be routinely used to guide surgical decision-making for peritonitis].
Objective: To evaluate the evidence base of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) for choice of relaparotomy (programmed vs on-demand) in severe peritonitis.
Material and methods: The study was carried out in 3 stages.
1. MPI-based assessment of evidence base of national guidelines «Peritonitis» regarding the choice of relaparotomy (programmed vs on-demand).
2. Statements and recommendations of current foreign guidelines on MPI-based choice of tactics for peritonitis.
3. Systematic review of evidence base of studies that used MPI to determine surgical tactics.
Results: The studies listed in national guidelines do not provide evidence of feasibility of MPI as a tool for determining tactics. This index is not mentioned in 3 out of 7 foreign recommendations on abdominal surgical infection. In other recommendations with moderate level of recommendations and low level of evidence, MPI is indicated as a tool for predicting mortality. In 7 retrospective studies not included in recommendations, there was no evidence for advisability of MPI to determine surgical tactics.
Conclusion: There is currently no evidence base for MPI in choosing programmed or on-demand relaparotomy in case of severe peritonitis. Further high-evidence studies are required to find significant criteria.