Kjell Noordzij, Joost Oude Groeniger, Willem de Koster, Jeroen van der Waal
{"title":"“对普通人来说,这根本行不通”:揭露荷兰环境可持续性的流行镜头。","authors":"Kjell Noordzij, Joost Oude Groeniger, Willem de Koster, Jeroen van der Waal","doi":"10.1080/15487733.2025.2500153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Governments grapple with garnering public support for the interventions they propose to achieve with respect to environmental sustainability. We depart from the position that interventions for these issues must align with public perspectives to receive support among the population at large. Our study uses 14 focus-group interviews (<i>n</i> = 57) conducted in the Netherlands to inductively explore these perspectives on a wide range of sustainability issues and their interventions. Our sample predominantly comprises individuals who have not completed tertiary education. As extant research suggests, these individuals are less concerned with sustainability issues. We identify three lenses through which our respondents perceived sustainability, namely how it: 1) impacts their personal life (<i>lens of need</i>); 2) aligns with their community (<i>lens of community</i>); and 3) raises doubts (<i>lens of doubt</i>). They reveal that many respondents are principally engaged with sustainability in ways that they felt had practical repercussions for them or their community. We conclude by instigating a rethinking of inclusive sustainability interventions by sensitizing them to the perspectives individuals have of sustainability issues and interventions, and those of non-tertiary educated individuals in particular.</p>","PeriodicalId":35192,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","volume":"21 1","pages":"2500153"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"For normal people, it just doesn't work\\\": uncovering popular lenses on environmental sustainability in The Netherlands.\",\"authors\":\"Kjell Noordzij, Joost Oude Groeniger, Willem de Koster, Jeroen van der Waal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15487733.2025.2500153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Governments grapple with garnering public support for the interventions they propose to achieve with respect to environmental sustainability. We depart from the position that interventions for these issues must align with public perspectives to receive support among the population at large. Our study uses 14 focus-group interviews (<i>n</i> = 57) conducted in the Netherlands to inductively explore these perspectives on a wide range of sustainability issues and their interventions. Our sample predominantly comprises individuals who have not completed tertiary education. As extant research suggests, these individuals are less concerned with sustainability issues. We identify three lenses through which our respondents perceived sustainability, namely how it: 1) impacts their personal life (<i>lens of need</i>); 2) aligns with their community (<i>lens of community</i>); and 3) raises doubts (<i>lens of doubt</i>). They reveal that many respondents are principally engaged with sustainability in ways that they felt had practical repercussions for them or their community. We conclude by instigating a rethinking of inclusive sustainability interventions by sensitizing them to the perspectives individuals have of sustainability issues and interventions, and those of non-tertiary educated individuals in particular.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"2500153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333056/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2025.2500153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2025.2500153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
"For normal people, it just doesn't work": uncovering popular lenses on environmental sustainability in The Netherlands.
Governments grapple with garnering public support for the interventions they propose to achieve with respect to environmental sustainability. We depart from the position that interventions for these issues must align with public perspectives to receive support among the population at large. Our study uses 14 focus-group interviews (n = 57) conducted in the Netherlands to inductively explore these perspectives on a wide range of sustainability issues and their interventions. Our sample predominantly comprises individuals who have not completed tertiary education. As extant research suggests, these individuals are less concerned with sustainability issues. We identify three lenses through which our respondents perceived sustainability, namely how it: 1) impacts their personal life (lens of need); 2) aligns with their community (lens of community); and 3) raises doubts (lens of doubt). They reveal that many respondents are principally engaged with sustainability in ways that they felt had practical repercussions for them or their community. We conclude by instigating a rethinking of inclusive sustainability interventions by sensitizing them to the perspectives individuals have of sustainability issues and interventions, and those of non-tertiary educated individuals in particular.
期刊介绍:
Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy is a refereed, open-access journal which recognizes that climate change and other socio-environmental challenges require significant transformation of existing systems of consumption and production. Complex and diverse arrays of societal factors and institutions will in coming decades need to reconfigure agro-food systems, implement renewable energy sources, and reinvent housing, modes of mobility, and lifestyles for the current century and beyond. These innovations will need to be formulated in ways that enhance global equity, reduce unequal access to resources, and enable all people on the planet to lead flourishing lives within biophysical constraints. The journal seeks to advance scientific and political perspectives and to cultivate transdisciplinary discussions involving researchers, policy makers, civic entrepreneurs, and others. The ultimate objective is to encourage the design and deployment of both local experiments and system innovations that contribute to a more sustainable future by empowering individuals and organizations and facilitating processes of social learning.