[人工智能荧光法与传统流式细胞术检测少精症患者精子DFI的比较]。

Q4 Medicine

中华男科学杂志 Pub Date : 2025-02-01

Shao-Bin Lin, Gui-Quan Wang, Ping Li

{"title":"[人工智能荧光法与传统流式细胞术检测少精症患者精子DFI的比较]。","authors":"Shao-Bin Lin, Gui-Quan Wang, Ping Li","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore the influence of oligospermia (OS) on the detection of sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) by fluorescence method based on artificial intelligence (AI) recognition and flow cytometry-based sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA).Methods: We collected semen samples from 201 males, including 50 azoospermia (AS) patients as negative controls, 90 OS patients (sperm concentration >0×10⁶/ml and <15×10⁶/ml), and 61 normal men (sperm concentration ≥15×10⁶/ml). Then we subdivided the OS patients into a mild OS (sperm concentration ≥10×10⁶/ml and <15×10⁶/ml), a moderate OS (sperm concentration ≥5×10⁶/ml and <10×10⁶/ml) and a severe/extremely severe OS group (sperm concentration >0×10⁶/ml and <5×10⁶/ml), with 30 cases in each group, and compared the results of DFI detection between the AI fluorescence method and traditional flow cytometry.Results: The DFI value detected by AI fluorescence method showed statistically significant difference from that detected by flow cytometry in the AS, moderate OS and severe/extremely severe OS groups (P<0.01), the former even lower than the latter, but not in the normal control and the mild OS groups (P > 0.05). In the AS group, a dramatically lower rate of non-0 results was achieved by AI fluorescence method than by flow cytometry (8% vs 100%, P<0.01). The DFI values detected by AI fluorescence method exhibited a good linear correlation to those obtained by flow cytometry in the normal control and mild OS groups (R2 = 0.7470; R2 = 0.7180), but a poor linear correlation in the OS full-sample, moderate OS and severe/extremely severe OS groups (R2 = 0.3092; R2 = 0.3558; R2 = 0.2147).Conclusion: The AI fluorescence method has a higher specificity and is more suitable than flow cytometry for detection of sperm DFI in OS patients. The DFI values obtained by the two methods are consistent with sperm concentration ≥10×10⁶/ml, but the accuracy of the results of detection may be affected with sperm concentration >0×10⁶/ml and <10×10⁶/ml.","PeriodicalId":24012,"journal":{"name":"中华男科学杂志","volume":"31 2","pages":"115-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Artificial intelligence fluorescence method versus traditional flow cytometry for detection of sperm DFI in oligospermia patients].\",\"authors\":\"Shao-Bin Lin, Gui-Quan Wang, Ping Li\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To explore the influence of oligospermia (OS) on the detection of sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) by fluorescence method based on artificial intelligence (AI) recognition and flow cytometry-based sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA).Methods: We collected semen samples from 201 males, including 50 azoospermia (AS) patients as negative controls, 90 OS patients (sperm concentration >0×10⁶/ml and <15×10⁶/ml), and 61 normal men (sperm concentration ≥15×10⁶/ml). Then we subdivided the OS patients into a mild OS (sperm concentration ≥10×10⁶/ml and <15×10⁶/ml), a moderate OS (sperm concentration ≥5×10⁶/ml and <10×10⁶/ml) and a severe/extremely severe OS group (sperm concentration >0×10⁶/ml and <5×10⁶/ml), with 30 cases in each group, and compared the results of DFI detection between the AI fluorescence method and traditional flow cytometry.Results: The DFI value detected by AI fluorescence method showed statistically significant difference from that detected by flow cytometry in the AS, moderate OS and severe/extremely severe OS groups (P<0.01), the former even lower than the latter, but not in the normal control and the mild OS groups (P > 0.05). In the AS group, a dramatically lower rate of non-0 results was achieved by AI fluorescence method than by flow cytometry (8% vs 100%, P<0.01). The DFI values detected by AI fluorescence method exhibited a good linear correlation to those obtained by flow cytometry in the normal control and mild OS groups (R2 = 0.7470; R2 = 0.7180), but a poor linear correlation in the OS full-sample, moderate OS and severe/extremely severe OS groups (R2 = 0.3092; R2 = 0.3558; R2 = 0.2147).Conclusion: The AI fluorescence method has a higher specificity and is more suitable than flow cytometry for detection of sperm DFI in OS patients. The DFI values obtained by the two methods are consistent with sperm concentration ≥10×10⁶/ml, but the accuracy of the results of detection may be affected with sperm concentration >0×10⁶/ml and <10×10⁶/ml.\",\"PeriodicalId\":24012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华男科学杂志\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"115-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华男科学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华男科学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：探讨少精子症（OS）对基于人工智能（AI）识别的荧光法和基于流式细胞术的精子染色质结构分析（SCSA）检测精子DNA片段化指数（DFI）的影响。方法：采集201例男性精液样本，其中无精子症（AS）患者50例为阴性对照，OS患者90例（精子浓度>0×10⁶/ml和0×10⁶/ml）。结果：AS组、中度OS组和重度/极重度OS组，AI荧光法检测的DFI值与流式细胞术检测的DFI值差异有统计学意义（P < 0.05）。在AS组中，AI荧光法的非0结果率明显低于流式细胞术（8% vs 100%）。结论：AI荧光法特异性更高，比流式细胞术更适合于OS患者精子DFI的检测。两种方法得到的DFI值与精子浓度≥10×10⁶/ml一致，但精子浓度>0×10⁶/ml和

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

[Artificial intelligence fluorescence method versus traditional flow cytometry for detection of sperm DFI in oligospermia patients].

Objective: To explore the influence of oligospermia (OS) on the detection of sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) by fluorescence method based on artificial intelligence (AI) recognition and flow cytometry-based sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA).

Methods: We collected semen samples from 201 males, including 50 azoospermia (AS) patients as negative controls, 90 OS patients (sperm concentration >0×10⁶/ml and <15×10⁶/ml), and 61 normal men (sperm concentration ≥15×10⁶/ml). Then we subdivided the OS patients into a mild OS (sperm concentration ≥10×10⁶/ml and <15×10⁶/ml), a moderate OS (sperm concentration ≥5×10⁶/ml and <10×10⁶/ml) and a severe/extremely severe OS group (sperm concentration >0×10⁶/ml and <5×10⁶/ml), with 30 cases in each group, and compared the results of DFI detection between the AI fluorescence method and traditional flow cytometry.

Results: The DFI value detected by AI fluorescence method showed statistically significant difference from that detected by flow cytometry in the AS, moderate OS and severe/extremely severe OS groups (P<0.01), the former even lower than the latter, but not in the normal control and the mild OS groups (P > 0.05). In the AS group, a dramatically lower rate of non-0 results was achieved by AI fluorescence method than by flow cytometry (8% vs 100%, P<0.01). The DFI values detected by AI fluorescence method exhibited a good linear correlation to those obtained by flow cytometry in the normal control and mild OS groups (R2 = 0.7470; R2 = 0.7180), but a poor linear correlation in the OS full-sample, moderate OS and severe/extremely severe OS groups (R2 = 0.3092; R2 = 0.3558; R2 = 0.2147).

Conclusion: The AI fluorescence method has a higher specificity and is more suitable than flow cytometry for detection of sperm DFI in OS patients. The DFI values obtained by the two methods are consistent with sperm concentration ≥10×10⁶/ml, but the accuracy of the results of detection may be affected with sperm concentration >0×10⁶/ml and <10×10⁶/ml.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

中华男科学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

5367

期刊介绍： National journal of andrology was founded in June 1995. It is a core journal of andrology and reproductive medicine, published monthly, and is publicly distributed at home and abroad. The main columns include expert talks, monographs (basic research, clinical research, evidence-based medicine, traditional Chinese medicine), reviews, clinical experience exchanges, case reports, etc. Priority is given to various fund-funded projects, especially the 12th Five-Year National Support Plan and the National Natural Science Foundation funded projects. This journal is included in about 20 domestic databases, including the National Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Journal (China Science and Technology Core Journal), the Source Journal of the China Science Citation Database, the Statistical Source Journal of the China Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database (CAJCED), the Full-text Collection Journal of the China Journal Full-text Database (CJFD), the Overview of the Chinese Core Journals (2017 Edition), and the Source Journal of the Top Academic Papers of China's Fine Science and Technology Journals (F5000). It has been included in the full text of the American Chemical Abstracts, the American MEDLINE, the American EBSCO, and the database.