2016-2021年医疗保险按服务收费受益人中提前护理计划的医生计费。

Q2 Social Sciences
The Permanente journal Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-08-11 DOI:10.7812/TPP/24.177
Nan Wang, Changchuan Jiang, Elizabeth Paulk, Tianci Wang, Xin Hu
{"title":"2016-2021年医疗保险按服务收费受益人中提前护理计划的医生计费。","authors":"Nan Wang, Changchuan Jiang, Elizabeth Paulk, Tianci Wang, Xin Hu","doi":"10.7812/TPP/24.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services started reimbursing practitioners for their time spent providing advance care planning (ACP) with patients. This study assessed utilization of this policy by examining trends in ACP billing across medical specialties from 2016 to 2021 and differences in ACP service volume by metropolitan status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors analyzed Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment files (2016-2021) from 6 specialty groups using corresponding Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes to derive trends in the percentage of practitioners billing any ACP visit. Wilcoxon tests were conducted to compare the average number of visits by metropolitan status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of practitioners billing ACP visits tripled from 1.76% in 2016 to 4.56% in 2021, with the highest percentage among hospice and palliative medicine practitioners (36.94%) in 2021. ACP service volume was similar by metropolitan status for hospice and palliative medicine, but it was higher in nonmetropolitan regions for cancer-related specialties, non-cancer terminal disease specialties, and primary and geriatrics care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This nationwide analysis showed low adoption of ACP billing by 2021, and it varied widely across specialties. This may reflect practical challenges of ACP related to comfort level with ACP discussion and documentation burden among the professional communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite an overall increase in the proportion of physicians billing ACP codes from 2016 to 2021, adoption remained low. Efforts are needed to address barriers to ACP and provide goal-concordant care to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"105-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician Billing for Advance Care Planning Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries, 2016-2021.\",\"authors\":\"Nan Wang, Changchuan Jiang, Elizabeth Paulk, Tianci Wang, Xin Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.7812/TPP/24.177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services started reimbursing practitioners for their time spent providing advance care planning (ACP) with patients. This study assessed utilization of this policy by examining trends in ACP billing across medical specialties from 2016 to 2021 and differences in ACP service volume by metropolitan status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors analyzed Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment files (2016-2021) from 6 specialty groups using corresponding Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes to derive trends in the percentage of practitioners billing any ACP visit. Wilcoxon tests were conducted to compare the average number of visits by metropolitan status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of practitioners billing ACP visits tripled from 1.76% in 2016 to 4.56% in 2021, with the highest percentage among hospice and palliative medicine practitioners (36.94%) in 2021. ACP service volume was similar by metropolitan status for hospice and palliative medicine, but it was higher in nonmetropolitan regions for cancer-related specialties, non-cancer terminal disease specialties, and primary and geriatrics care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This nationwide analysis showed low adoption of ACP billing by 2021, and it varied widely across specialties. This may reflect practical challenges of ACP related to comfort level with ACP discussion and documentation burden among the professional communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite an overall increase in the proportion of physicians billing ACP codes from 2016 to 2021, adoption remained low. Efforts are needed to address barriers to ACP and provide goal-concordant care to patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485236/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/24.177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/24.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:2016年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心开始报销从业人员为患者提供提前护理计划(ACP)所花费的时间。本研究通过检查2016年至2021年医疗专业ACP计费趋势以及各大都市ACP服务量的差异,评估了该政策的使用情况。方法:作者使用相应的医疗保健通用程序编码系统代码分析了医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医疗保险提供者使用和支付文件(2016-2021),这些文件来自6个专科组,以得出任何ACP就诊的从业者百分比的趋势。进行了Wilcoxon测试,以比较各大城市的平均访问次数。结果:使用ACP就诊的执业医师比例从2016年的1.76%增加到2021年的4.56%,增长了两倍,其中临终关怀和姑息医学执业医师比例最高(36.94%)。ACP服务量在城市地区的临终关怀和姑息治疗方面相似,但在非城市地区,癌症相关专科、非癌症晚期疾病专科、初级和老年保健的ACP服务量更高。讨论:这项全国性的分析显示,到2021年,ACP计费的采用率很低,而且各专业的采用率差异很大。这可能反映了ACP的实际挑战,涉及专业团体对ACP讨论和文件负担的舒适程度。结论:尽管从2016年到2021年,使用ACP代码的医生比例总体上有所增加,但采用率仍然很低。需要努力解决ACP的障碍,并为患者提供目标一致的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physician Billing for Advance Care Planning Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries, 2016-2021.

Introduction: In 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services started reimbursing practitioners for their time spent providing advance care planning (ACP) with patients. This study assessed utilization of this policy by examining trends in ACP billing across medical specialties from 2016 to 2021 and differences in ACP service volume by metropolitan status.

Methods: The authors analyzed Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment files (2016-2021) from 6 specialty groups using corresponding Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes to derive trends in the percentage of practitioners billing any ACP visit. Wilcoxon tests were conducted to compare the average number of visits by metropolitan status.

Results: The percentage of practitioners billing ACP visits tripled from 1.76% in 2016 to 4.56% in 2021, with the highest percentage among hospice and palliative medicine practitioners (36.94%) in 2021. ACP service volume was similar by metropolitan status for hospice and palliative medicine, but it was higher in nonmetropolitan regions for cancer-related specialties, non-cancer terminal disease specialties, and primary and geriatrics care.

Discussion: This nationwide analysis showed low adoption of ACP billing by 2021, and it varied widely across specialties. This may reflect practical challenges of ACP related to comfort level with ACP discussion and documentation burden among the professional communities.

Conclusion: Despite an overall increase in the proportion of physicians billing ACP codes from 2016 to 2021, adoption remained low. Efforts are needed to address barriers to ACP and provide goal-concordant care to patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信