美国医院安全网负担和COVID-19住院治疗的结果:对国家多中心数据库的分析

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Titilope Olanipekun, Joseph Heaton, Temidayo Abe, Abimbola Chris-Olaiya, Bekure B Siraw, Isha Shahin, Ndausung Udongwo, Iván A Huespe, Devang Sanghavi
{"title":"美国医院安全网负担和COVID-19住院治疗的结果:对国家多中心数据库的分析","authors":"Titilope Olanipekun, Joseph Heaton, Temidayo Abe, Abimbola Chris-Olaiya, Bekure B Siraw, Isha Shahin, Ndausung Udongwo, Iván A Huespe, Devang Sanghavi","doi":"10.1177/08850666251366167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSafety-net hospitals (SNH) provide care to a significant proportion of low-income, uninsured, and underserved populations disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the impact of safety-net burden on outcomes of COVID-19 hospitalizations.MethodsWe identified patients aged ≥ 18 years hospitalized with COVID-19 from the nationwide inpatient database using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10-CM) code U07.1. The primary study outcomes were inpatient mortality, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and tracheostomy use. Secondary outcomes were total hospitalization costs (THC) and length of hospital stay (LOS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes in HBH and medium safety-net burden (MBH) with lower-burden hospitals (LBH) (reference).ResultsAn estimated 2,608,232 COVID-19 hospitalizations met the inclusion criteria, with 68.7% occurring in HBH, 22.8% in MBH, and 8.5% in LBH. On adjusted multivariable analysis, HBH was associated with increased odds of inpatient mortality (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.28) compared with LBH. Both HBH (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.21-1.40) and MBH (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.24) demonstrated increased odds of mechanical ventilation compared with LBH. THC was lower in HBH and MBH compared with LBH. The LOS was similar across safety net burden categories.ConclusionAfter adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors, COVID-19 hospitalizations at HBH had inferior inpatient outcomes compared with LBH. Targeted policy reforms are needed to address the underlying causes of these disparities and increase our health systems' readiness for future crises, particularly in underserved communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251366167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital Safety-Net Burden and Outcomes of COVID-19 Hospitalizations in the US: Analysis of a National Multicenter Database.\",\"authors\":\"Titilope Olanipekun, Joseph Heaton, Temidayo Abe, Abimbola Chris-Olaiya, Bekure B Siraw, Isha Shahin, Ndausung Udongwo, Iván A Huespe, Devang Sanghavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08850666251366167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundSafety-net hospitals (SNH) provide care to a significant proportion of low-income, uninsured, and underserved populations disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the impact of safety-net burden on outcomes of COVID-19 hospitalizations.MethodsWe identified patients aged ≥ 18 years hospitalized with COVID-19 from the nationwide inpatient database using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10-CM) code U07.1. The primary study outcomes were inpatient mortality, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and tracheostomy use. Secondary outcomes were total hospitalization costs (THC) and length of hospital stay (LOS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes in HBH and medium safety-net burden (MBH) with lower-burden hospitals (LBH) (reference).ResultsAn estimated 2,608,232 COVID-19 hospitalizations met the inclusion criteria, with 68.7% occurring in HBH, 22.8% in MBH, and 8.5% in LBH. On adjusted multivariable analysis, HBH was associated with increased odds of inpatient mortality (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.28) compared with LBH. Both HBH (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.21-1.40) and MBH (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.24) demonstrated increased odds of mechanical ventilation compared with LBH. THC was lower in HBH and MBH compared with LBH. The LOS was similar across safety net burden categories.ConclusionAfter adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors, COVID-19 hospitalizations at HBH had inferior inpatient outcomes compared with LBH. Targeted policy reforms are needed to address the underlying causes of these disparities and increase our health systems' readiness for future crises, particularly in underserved communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8850666251366167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251366167\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251366167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安全网医院(SNH)为受COVID-19大流行严重影响的大量低收入、无保险和服务不足人群提供医疗服务。我们评估了安全网负担对COVID-19住院治疗结果的影响。方法采用国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10-CM)代码U07.1,从全国住院患者数据库中筛选年龄≥18岁的COVID-19住院患者。主要研究结果为住院死亡率、需要机械通气的呼吸衰竭和气管切开术。次要结局是总住院费用(THC)和住院时间(LOS)。采用多变量logistic回归比较HBH和中等安全网负担(MBH)与低负担医院(LBH)的主要和次要结局(参考文献)。结果共有2608232例新冠肺炎住院患者符合纳入标准,其中HBH患者占68.7%,MBH患者占22.8%,LBH患者占8.5%。在校正多变量分析中,与LBH相比,HBH与住院患者死亡率增加相关(aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.28)。与LBH相比,HBH (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.21-1.40)和MBH (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.24)均显示机械通气的几率增加。与LBH相比,HBH和MBH中THC含量较低。各安全网负担类别的LOS相似。结论在调整了患者和医院层面的因素后,HBH与LBH相比,COVID-19住院患者的住院预后较差。需要进行有针对性的政策改革,以解决这些差异的根本原因,并提高我们的卫生系统对未来危机的准备,特别是在服务不足的社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hospital Safety-Net Burden and Outcomes of COVID-19 Hospitalizations in the US: Analysis of a National Multicenter Database.

BackgroundSafety-net hospitals (SNH) provide care to a significant proportion of low-income, uninsured, and underserved populations disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the impact of safety-net burden on outcomes of COVID-19 hospitalizations.MethodsWe identified patients aged ≥ 18 years hospitalized with COVID-19 from the nationwide inpatient database using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10-CM) code U07.1. The primary study outcomes were inpatient mortality, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and tracheostomy use. Secondary outcomes were total hospitalization costs (THC) and length of hospital stay (LOS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes in HBH and medium safety-net burden (MBH) with lower-burden hospitals (LBH) (reference).ResultsAn estimated 2,608,232 COVID-19 hospitalizations met the inclusion criteria, with 68.7% occurring in HBH, 22.8% in MBH, and 8.5% in LBH. On adjusted multivariable analysis, HBH was associated with increased odds of inpatient mortality (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.28) compared with LBH. Both HBH (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.21-1.40) and MBH (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.24) demonstrated increased odds of mechanical ventilation compared with LBH. THC was lower in HBH and MBH compared with LBH. The LOS was similar across safety net burden categories.ConclusionAfter adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors, COVID-19 hospitalizations at HBH had inferior inpatient outcomes compared with LBH. Targeted policy reforms are needed to address the underlying causes of these disparities and increase our health systems' readiness for future crises, particularly in underserved communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信