Robert Stolz, Alice Liu, Jonathan Darby, Marion Kainer, Stephen Guy, Leong Shuen Loo, Craig Aboltins, Pann Ei Wynn, Patrick G P Charles, Kumar Visvanathan, Peter Kelley, Tony Korman, Nicole Gilroy, Joe Sasadeusz
{"title":"在澳大利亚,瑞德西韦在同情获取下为中/重度COVID-19提供了有效的现实结果。","authors":"Robert Stolz, Alice Liu, Jonathan Darby, Marion Kainer, Stephen Guy, Leong Shuen Loo, Craig Aboltins, Pann Ei Wynn, Patrick G P Charles, Kumar Visvanathan, Peter Kelley, Tony Korman, Nicole Gilroy, Joe Sasadeusz","doi":"10.1111/imj.70173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remdesivir is a nucleotide analogue with in vitro activity against SARS-COV-2. Clinical trial data from the ACTT-1 randomised clinical trial demonstrated improved time to clinical recovery. The effectiveness and safety in a real world setting in Australia are unknown.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate real-world clinical outcomes in an Australian setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review in a tertiary care setting of patients who received remdesivir under compassionate access in 10 Australian hospitals between July and December 2020. The primary outcome was time to recovery, as defined on an ordinal scale by discharge or hospitalisation no longer requiring any acute medical care. Secondary outcomes including 28-day mortality were also measured and compared to data from ACTT-1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected on 220 patients. The average age was 61 years (range 23-96); 76 (34%) patients had diabetes, 45 (20%) had pre-existing lung disease, and 21 (9%) were immunosuppressed; 214 (96%) patients were hypoxic at any point during the admission, and 51 (22%) patients required mechanical ventilation. Mean duration of symptoms to commencement of remdesivir was 7 days (range 0-14), while 213 (95%) received glucocorticoids. Median time to improvement on remdesivir was 4 days, compared to 7 days in patients receiving remdesivir in ACTT-1. The 28-day mortality was 9%, compared to 11% in ACTT-1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical recovery and mortality with remdesivir in a real-world setting were at least comparable to randomised clinical trial data, confirming effectiveness in this setting. Use of adjunctive glucocorticoids in this cohort likely contributed to the improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective real-world outcomes of remdesivir provided under compassionate access for moderate/severe COVID-19 in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Stolz, Alice Liu, Jonathan Darby, Marion Kainer, Stephen Guy, Leong Shuen Loo, Craig Aboltins, Pann Ei Wynn, Patrick G P Charles, Kumar Visvanathan, Peter Kelley, Tony Korman, Nicole Gilroy, Joe Sasadeusz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.70173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remdesivir is a nucleotide analogue with in vitro activity against SARS-COV-2. Clinical trial data from the ACTT-1 randomised clinical trial demonstrated improved time to clinical recovery. The effectiveness and safety in a real world setting in Australia are unknown.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate real-world clinical outcomes in an Australian setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review in a tertiary care setting of patients who received remdesivir under compassionate access in 10 Australian hospitals between July and December 2020. The primary outcome was time to recovery, as defined on an ordinal scale by discharge or hospitalisation no longer requiring any acute medical care. Secondary outcomes including 28-day mortality were also measured and compared to data from ACTT-1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected on 220 patients. The average age was 61 years (range 23-96); 76 (34%) patients had diabetes, 45 (20%) had pre-existing lung disease, and 21 (9%) were immunosuppressed; 214 (96%) patients were hypoxic at any point during the admission, and 51 (22%) patients required mechanical ventilation. Mean duration of symptoms to commencement of remdesivir was 7 days (range 0-14), while 213 (95%) received glucocorticoids. Median time to improvement on remdesivir was 4 days, compared to 7 days in patients receiving remdesivir in ACTT-1. The 28-day mortality was 9%, compared to 11% in ACTT-1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical recovery and mortality with remdesivir in a real-world setting were at least comparable to randomised clinical trial data, confirming effectiveness in this setting. Use of adjunctive glucocorticoids in this cohort likely contributed to the improved outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70173\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effective real-world outcomes of remdesivir provided under compassionate access for moderate/severe COVID-19 in Australia.
Background: Remdesivir is a nucleotide analogue with in vitro activity against SARS-COV-2. Clinical trial data from the ACTT-1 randomised clinical trial demonstrated improved time to clinical recovery. The effectiveness and safety in a real world setting in Australia are unknown.
Aim: To evaluate real-world clinical outcomes in an Australian setting.
Methods: Retrospective chart review in a tertiary care setting of patients who received remdesivir under compassionate access in 10 Australian hospitals between July and December 2020. The primary outcome was time to recovery, as defined on an ordinal scale by discharge or hospitalisation no longer requiring any acute medical care. Secondary outcomes including 28-day mortality were also measured and compared to data from ACTT-1.
Results: Data were collected on 220 patients. The average age was 61 years (range 23-96); 76 (34%) patients had diabetes, 45 (20%) had pre-existing lung disease, and 21 (9%) were immunosuppressed; 214 (96%) patients were hypoxic at any point during the admission, and 51 (22%) patients required mechanical ventilation. Mean duration of symptoms to commencement of remdesivir was 7 days (range 0-14), while 213 (95%) received glucocorticoids. Median time to improvement on remdesivir was 4 days, compared to 7 days in patients receiving remdesivir in ACTT-1. The 28-day mortality was 9%, compared to 11% in ACTT-1.
Conclusion: Clinical recovery and mortality with remdesivir in a real-world setting were at least comparable to randomised clinical trial data, confirming effectiveness in this setting. Use of adjunctive glucocorticoids in this cohort likely contributed to the improved outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.