有癌症病史的类风湿关节炎患者的治疗。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Beeta Shasti-Nazem, Sanyogita Chandra, Jennifer Strouse, Namrata Singh
{"title":"有癌症病史的类风湿关节炎患者的治疗。","authors":"Beeta Shasti-Nazem, Sanyogita Chandra, Jennifer Strouse, Namrata Singh","doi":"10.1007/s11926-025-01200-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review article examines the evolving evidence on cancer recurrence and new malignancy risk associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including TNF inhibitors, rituximab, IL-6 inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a prior malignancy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Conventional synthetic DMARDs are generally considered safe in patients with a history of cancer, with earlier concerns about skin and hematologic malignancies largely disproven. Hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, and leflunomide similarly show no consistent cancer risk. Biologic DMARDs, including TNF inhibitors, rituximab, and abatacept, have not been linked to increased cancer recurrence, though caution is advised in patients with a history of skin cancer. Despite supportive evidence, bDMARD use has declined following cancer diagnoses. JAK inhibitors, however, have shown increased risk of lung cancer in older patients with cardiovascular risk factors, prompting cautious use until more data is available. Although large population clinical trials are lacking, current evidence does not demonstrate any increased risk with initiation of csDMARDs, TNF inhibitors, and rituximab in RA patients with a history of cancer. Abatacept and IL-6 inhibitors may also be reasonable options but require further data. JAK inhibitors should be used cautiously until more reliable data becomes available. These findings support cautious but not prohibitive use of bDMARDs in RA patients with a history of cancer, emphasizing individualized risk assessment and shared decision-making. Further high-quality, prospective studies are needed to guide therapy in this complex clinical population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10761,"journal":{"name":"Current Rheumatology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Persons with Rheumatoid Arthritis with a History of Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Beeta Shasti-Nazem, Sanyogita Chandra, Jennifer Strouse, Namrata Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11926-025-01200-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review article examines the evolving evidence on cancer recurrence and new malignancy risk associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including TNF inhibitors, rituximab, IL-6 inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a prior malignancy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Conventional synthetic DMARDs are generally considered safe in patients with a history of cancer, with earlier concerns about skin and hematologic malignancies largely disproven. Hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, and leflunomide similarly show no consistent cancer risk. Biologic DMARDs, including TNF inhibitors, rituximab, and abatacept, have not been linked to increased cancer recurrence, though caution is advised in patients with a history of skin cancer. Despite supportive evidence, bDMARD use has declined following cancer diagnoses. JAK inhibitors, however, have shown increased risk of lung cancer in older patients with cardiovascular risk factors, prompting cautious use until more data is available. Although large population clinical trials are lacking, current evidence does not demonstrate any increased risk with initiation of csDMARDs, TNF inhibitors, and rituximab in RA patients with a history of cancer. Abatacept and IL-6 inhibitors may also be reasonable options but require further data. JAK inhibitors should be used cautiously until more reliable data becomes available. These findings support cautious but not prohibitive use of bDMARDs in RA patients with a history of cancer, emphasizing individualized risk assessment and shared decision-making. Further high-quality, prospective studies are needed to guide therapy in this complex clinical population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Rheumatology Reports\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Rheumatology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-025-01200-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Rheumatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-025-01200-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:本综述研究了类风湿关节炎和既往恶性肿瘤患者中与改善疾病的抗风湿药物(DMARDs)相关的癌症复发和新恶性肿瘤风险的不断发展的证据,包括TNF抑制剂、美罗华、IL-6抑制剂和JAK抑制剂。最近的发现:传统的合成dmard通常被认为对有癌症病史的患者是安全的,早期对皮肤和血液恶性肿瘤的担忧在很大程度上被证明是错误的。羟氯喹、磺胺嘧啶和来氟米特同样没有一致的癌症风险。生物dmard,包括TNF抑制剂、利妥昔单抗和阿巴接受,与癌症复发增加无关,但建议有皮肤癌病史的患者谨慎使用。尽管有支持性证据,但bDMARD的使用在癌症诊断后有所下降。然而,JAK抑制剂在有心血管危险因素的老年患者中显示出肺癌风险增加,提示在获得更多数据之前谨慎使用。虽然缺乏大人群临床试验,但目前的证据并未表明有癌症病史的RA患者开始使用csdmard、TNF抑制剂和利妥昔单抗会增加风险。阿巴接受和IL-6抑制剂也可能是合理的选择,但需要进一步的数据。在获得更可靠的数据之前,应谨慎使用JAK抑制剂。这些发现支持对有癌症病史的RA患者谨慎但不禁止使用bdmard,强调个体化风险评估和共同决策。需要进一步的高质量前瞻性研究来指导这一复杂临床人群的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment of Persons with Rheumatoid Arthritis with a History of Cancer.

Purpose of review: This review article examines the evolving evidence on cancer recurrence and new malignancy risk associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including TNF inhibitors, rituximab, IL-6 inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a prior malignancy.

Recent findings: Conventional synthetic DMARDs are generally considered safe in patients with a history of cancer, with earlier concerns about skin and hematologic malignancies largely disproven. Hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, and leflunomide similarly show no consistent cancer risk. Biologic DMARDs, including TNF inhibitors, rituximab, and abatacept, have not been linked to increased cancer recurrence, though caution is advised in patients with a history of skin cancer. Despite supportive evidence, bDMARD use has declined following cancer diagnoses. JAK inhibitors, however, have shown increased risk of lung cancer in older patients with cardiovascular risk factors, prompting cautious use until more data is available. Although large population clinical trials are lacking, current evidence does not demonstrate any increased risk with initiation of csDMARDs, TNF inhibitors, and rituximab in RA patients with a history of cancer. Abatacept and IL-6 inhibitors may also be reasonable options but require further data. JAK inhibitors should be used cautiously until more reliable data becomes available. These findings support cautious but not prohibitive use of bDMARDs in RA patients with a history of cancer, emphasizing individualized risk assessment and shared decision-making. Further high-quality, prospective studies are needed to guide therapy in this complex clinical population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published research in the field of rheumatology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of rheumatologic conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas such as the many forms of arthritis, osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also occasionally provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信