在弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤中,嵌合抗原受体- t分离至输注时间过长与预后较差有关。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Suguru Morimoto, Tomoyasu Jo, Toshio Kitawaki, Takashi Sakamoto, Chisaki Mizumoto, Junya Kanda, Momoko Nishikori, Kouhei Yamashita, Miki Nagao, Akifumi Takaori-Kondo, Yasuyuki Arai
{"title":"在弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤中,嵌合抗原受体- t分离至输注时间过长与预后较差有关。","authors":"Suguru Morimoto,&nbsp;Tomoyasu Jo,&nbsp;Toshio Kitawaki,&nbsp;Takashi Sakamoto,&nbsp;Chisaki Mizumoto,&nbsp;Junya Kanda,&nbsp;Momoko Nishikori,&nbsp;Kouhei Yamashita,&nbsp;Miki Nagao,&nbsp;Akifumi Takaori-Kondo,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Arai","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is effective for relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, delays between apheresis and infusion frequently occur due to limited facility capacity and prolonged bridging therapy, and the clinical impact of such delays remains uncertain. We retrospectively analysed R/R DLBCL patients who underwent CAR-T-cell therapy at Kyoto University Hospital. Among 90 patients, the median apheresis to infusion interval was 66 days (range, 28–203). Patients were categorized into delayed (≥66 days) and non-delayed (&lt;66 days) groups. Baseline characteristics at infusion were similar, whereas adverse features such as extranodal involvement and stable/progressive disease (SD/PD) were less common in the delayed group. Multivariate analysis identified delayed infusion as a significant negative prognostic factor for progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63–6.00; <i>p</i> = 0.001), along with extranodal involvement (aHR 2.39; <i>p</i> = 0.004), SD/PD (aHR 2.66; <i>p</i> = 0.005), bulky disease (aHR 3.08; <i>p</i> = 0.008) and treatment with tisa-cel (aHR 5.26; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Overall survival was also inferior in the delayed group (aHR 2.53, 95% CI 1.29–4.96; <i>p</i> = 0.007). Minimizing apheresis to infusion interval through improved workflows, institutional capacity and avoiding prolonged bridging in non-responders may enhance outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"207 4","pages":"1484-1494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.70090","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prolonged chimeric antigen receptor-T apheresis to infusion time is associated with inferior outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma\",\"authors\":\"Suguru Morimoto,&nbsp;Tomoyasu Jo,&nbsp;Toshio Kitawaki,&nbsp;Takashi Sakamoto,&nbsp;Chisaki Mizumoto,&nbsp;Junya Kanda,&nbsp;Momoko Nishikori,&nbsp;Kouhei Yamashita,&nbsp;Miki Nagao,&nbsp;Akifumi Takaori-Kondo,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Arai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjh.70090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is effective for relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, delays between apheresis and infusion frequently occur due to limited facility capacity and prolonged bridging therapy, and the clinical impact of such delays remains uncertain. We retrospectively analysed R/R DLBCL patients who underwent CAR-T-cell therapy at Kyoto University Hospital. Among 90 patients, the median apheresis to infusion interval was 66 days (range, 28–203). Patients were categorized into delayed (≥66 days) and non-delayed (&lt;66 days) groups. Baseline characteristics at infusion were similar, whereas adverse features such as extranodal involvement and stable/progressive disease (SD/PD) were less common in the delayed group. Multivariate analysis identified delayed infusion as a significant negative prognostic factor for progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63–6.00; <i>p</i> = 0.001), along with extranodal involvement (aHR 2.39; <i>p</i> = 0.004), SD/PD (aHR 2.66; <i>p</i> = 0.005), bulky disease (aHR 3.08; <i>p</i> = 0.008) and treatment with tisa-cel (aHR 5.26; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Overall survival was also inferior in the delayed group (aHR 2.53, 95% CI 1.29–4.96; <i>p</i> = 0.007). Minimizing apheresis to infusion interval through improved workflows, institutional capacity and avoiding prolonged bridging in non-responders may enhance outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"volume\":\"207 4\",\"pages\":\"1484-1494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.70090\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.70090\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.70090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞疗法对复发/难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)有效。然而,由于设施容量有限和桥接治疗时间过长,在采血和输液之间经常发生延迟,这种延迟的临床影响尚不确定。我们回顾性分析了在京都大学医院接受car - t细胞治疗的复发/复发DLBCL患者。90例患者中,单采至输注间隔中位数为66天(范围28-203天)。患者分为延迟(≥66天)和非延迟(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prolonged chimeric antigen receptor-T apheresis to infusion time is associated with inferior outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Prolonged chimeric antigen receptor-T apheresis to infusion time is associated with inferior outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is effective for relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, delays between apheresis and infusion frequently occur due to limited facility capacity and prolonged bridging therapy, and the clinical impact of such delays remains uncertain. We retrospectively analysed R/R DLBCL patients who underwent CAR-T-cell therapy at Kyoto University Hospital. Among 90 patients, the median apheresis to infusion interval was 66 days (range, 28–203). Patients were categorized into delayed (≥66 days) and non-delayed (<66 days) groups. Baseline characteristics at infusion were similar, whereas adverse features such as extranodal involvement and stable/progressive disease (SD/PD) were less common in the delayed group. Multivariate analysis identified delayed infusion as a significant negative prognostic factor for progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63–6.00; p = 0.001), along with extranodal involvement (aHR 2.39; p = 0.004), SD/PD (aHR 2.66; p = 0.005), bulky disease (aHR 3.08; p = 0.008) and treatment with tisa-cel (aHR 5.26; p = 0.001). Overall survival was also inferior in the delayed group (aHR 2.53, 95% CI 1.29–4.96; p = 0.007). Minimizing apheresis to infusion interval through improved workflows, institutional capacity and avoiding prolonged bridging in non-responders may enhance outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
565
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信