利用监督机器学习对2023年kahramanmaraki地震中地面和强震变量对破坏状态的重要性进行建模

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mustafa Senkaya, Serhat E. Akhanlı, Ali Silahtar, Hasan Karaaslan
{"title":"利用监督机器学习对2023年kahramanmaraki地震中地面和强震变量对破坏状态的重要性进行建模","authors":"Mustafa Senkaya,&nbsp;Serhat E. Akhanlı,&nbsp;Ali Silahtar,&nbsp;Hasan Karaaslan","doi":"10.1002/gdj3.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The damage status of 44 locations was investigated, incorporating ground condition parameters such as Vs30, engineering bedrock depth (EBd), and predominant frequency (f0), as well as strong-motion parameters including PGA, Repi, and Rrup (epicentre and rupture distance, respectively). Various machine learning methods—logistic regression (LR), classification and regression trees (CART), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbours (KNN), and artificial neural networks (ANN)—were employed to evaluate the dataset through three approaches: the complete parameter set, solely ground-based parameters, and strong-motion parameters alone. Model performance, measured by Area Under the Curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC-ROC), ranged from 0.466 to 0.989, with KNN achieving the highest performance (0.989) when using the complete dataset and 0.988 with ground-based parameters alone. The analysis highlighted EBd and f0 as the most significant contributors to damage outcomes (normalised variable importance of 100% and 85%, respectively), demonstrating strong correlations with structural vulnerability. Among earthquake-related parameters, PGA was identified as the most influential factor in models established through strong-motion parameters, whereas Repi and Rrup demonstrated a considerably lower influence. On the other hand, specificity values (determining no-damage status) consistently exceeded sensitivity (determining damage status) in models based solely on earthquake parameters. Overall, the outputs demonstrate that traditional seismic hazard approaches based on earthquake parameters could provide a broad framework for risk mitigation; local site conditions, particularly EBd and f0, are the primary drivers of seismic risk. Integrating these detailed ground parameters into seismic assessments is critical for improving predictive accuracy and advancing earthquake engineering practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":54351,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Data Journal","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gdj3.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling the Importance of Ground and Strong-Motion Variables on the Damage Status in the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes Using Supervised Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Senkaya,&nbsp;Serhat E. Akhanlı,&nbsp;Ali Silahtar,&nbsp;Hasan Karaaslan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gdj3.70020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The damage status of 44 locations was investigated, incorporating ground condition parameters such as Vs30, engineering bedrock depth (EBd), and predominant frequency (f0), as well as strong-motion parameters including PGA, Repi, and Rrup (epicentre and rupture distance, respectively). Various machine learning methods—logistic regression (LR), classification and regression trees (CART), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbours (KNN), and artificial neural networks (ANN)—were employed to evaluate the dataset through three approaches: the complete parameter set, solely ground-based parameters, and strong-motion parameters alone. Model performance, measured by Area Under the Curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC-ROC), ranged from 0.466 to 0.989, with KNN achieving the highest performance (0.989) when using the complete dataset and 0.988 with ground-based parameters alone. The analysis highlighted EBd and f0 as the most significant contributors to damage outcomes (normalised variable importance of 100% and 85%, respectively), demonstrating strong correlations with structural vulnerability. Among earthquake-related parameters, PGA was identified as the most influential factor in models established through strong-motion parameters, whereas Repi and Rrup demonstrated a considerably lower influence. On the other hand, specificity values (determining no-damage status) consistently exceeded sensitivity (determining damage status) in models based solely on earthquake parameters. Overall, the outputs demonstrate that traditional seismic hazard approaches based on earthquake parameters could provide a broad framework for risk mitigation; local site conditions, particularly EBd and f0, are the primary drivers of seismic risk. Integrating these detailed ground parameters into seismic assessments is critical for improving predictive accuracy and advancing earthquake engineering practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoscience Data Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gdj3.70020\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoscience Data Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gdj3.70020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Data Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gdj3.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用Vs30、工程基岩深度(EBd)和主频(f0)等地面条件参数,以及PGA、Repi和Rrup(分别为震中和破裂距离)等强震参数,对44个地点的破坏状态进行了调查。采用各种机器学习方法-逻辑回归(LR),分类和回归树(CART),随机森林(RF),支持向量机(SVM), k近邻(KNN)和人工神经网络(ANN) -通过三种方法对数据集进行评估:完整参数集,仅基于地面参数和仅使用强运动参数。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)测量的模型性能范围为0.466至0.989,其中KNN在使用完整数据集时达到最高性能(0.989),而仅使用地面参数时达到0.988。分析强调EBd和f0是损害结果的最重要贡献者(标准化变量重要性分别为100%和85%),表明与结构脆弱性有很强的相关性。在地震相关参数中,PGA对强震参数建立的模型影响最大,而Repi和Rrup的影响较小。另一方面,在仅基于地震参数的模型中,特异性值(确定无损伤状态)始终超过敏感性值(确定损伤状态)。总体而言,产出表明,基于地震参数的传统地震灾害方法可以为减轻风险提供一个广泛的框架;当地的场地条件,特别是EBd和f0,是地震风险的主要驱动因素。将这些详细的地面参数整合到地震评估中,对于提高预测精度和推进地震工程实践至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Modelling the Importance of Ground and Strong-Motion Variables on the Damage Status in the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes Using Supervised Machine Learning

Modelling the Importance of Ground and Strong-Motion Variables on the Damage Status in the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes Using Supervised Machine Learning

Modelling the Importance of Ground and Strong-Motion Variables on the Damage Status in the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes Using Supervised Machine Learning

Modelling the Importance of Ground and Strong-Motion Variables on the Damage Status in the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes Using Supervised Machine Learning

The damage status of 44 locations was investigated, incorporating ground condition parameters such as Vs30, engineering bedrock depth (EBd), and predominant frequency (f0), as well as strong-motion parameters including PGA, Repi, and Rrup (epicentre and rupture distance, respectively). Various machine learning methods—logistic regression (LR), classification and regression trees (CART), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbours (KNN), and artificial neural networks (ANN)—were employed to evaluate the dataset through three approaches: the complete parameter set, solely ground-based parameters, and strong-motion parameters alone. Model performance, measured by Area Under the Curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC-ROC), ranged from 0.466 to 0.989, with KNN achieving the highest performance (0.989) when using the complete dataset and 0.988 with ground-based parameters alone. The analysis highlighted EBd and f0 as the most significant contributors to damage outcomes (normalised variable importance of 100% and 85%, respectively), demonstrating strong correlations with structural vulnerability. Among earthquake-related parameters, PGA was identified as the most influential factor in models established through strong-motion parameters, whereas Repi and Rrup demonstrated a considerably lower influence. On the other hand, specificity values (determining no-damage status) consistently exceeded sensitivity (determining damage status) in models based solely on earthquake parameters. Overall, the outputs demonstrate that traditional seismic hazard approaches based on earthquake parameters could provide a broad framework for risk mitigation; local site conditions, particularly EBd and f0, are the primary drivers of seismic risk. Integrating these detailed ground parameters into seismic assessments is critical for improving predictive accuracy and advancing earthquake engineering practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoscience Data Journal
Geoscience Data Journal GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Geoscience Data Journal provides an Open Access platform where scientific data can be formally published, in a way that includes scientific peer-review. Thus the dataset creator attains full credit for their efforts, while also improving the scientific record, providing version control for the community and allowing major datasets to be fully described, cited and discovered. An online-only journal, GDJ publishes short data papers cross-linked to – and citing – datasets that have been deposited in approved data centres and awarded DOIs. The journal will also accept articles on data services, and articles which support and inform data publishing best practices. Data is at the heart of science and scientific endeavour. The curation of data and the science associated with it is as important as ever in our understanding of the changing earth system and thereby enabling us to make future predictions. Geoscience Data Journal is working with recognised Data Centres across the globe to develop the future strategy for data publication, the recognition of the value of data and the communication and exploitation of data to the wider science and stakeholder communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信