重新思考农林业与土著关怀,互惠和咖啡领域的长期关系

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Joao Gabriel Rodrigues Telles Almeida, Lorena Soto-Pinto
{"title":"重新思考农林业与土著关怀,互惠和咖啡领域的长期关系","authors":"Joao Gabriel Rodrigues Telles Almeida,&nbsp;Lorena Soto-Pinto","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01263-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article explores Indigenous agroforestry systems in the Mesoamerican coffee territories of Chiapas, Mexico, emphasizing their relational, aesthetic, and ontological dimensions. Based on a 4-years transdisciplinary research process using the Extended Case Method, the study analyzes how coffee agroforestry systems are not merely productive or ecological arrangements, but living territories sustained by multispecies networks of care, reciprocity, and co-production between humans and more-than-human beings. Drawing on fieldwork with peasant and Indigenous families, the concept of socio-environmental mutualism is proposed to describe these relational dynamics, which challenge the anthropocentric and functionalist frameworks that dominate agroforestry science and policy. The findings suggest that long-term adherence to agroforestry systems cannot be explained solely by technical or economic variables, but requires recognizing the affective, ethical, and intersubjective relationships that families establish with the land and its beings. The article argues that reimagining agroforestry from this relational perspective opens new possibilities for strengthening territorial resilience, provided that such efforts respect the situated ontologies and knowledge systems that sustain these practices. The study concludes by calling for transdisciplinary methodologies that integrate multispecies ethnography, affective and relational measures, and participatory processes to expand the dialogue between scientific, peasant, and Indigenous knowledge. </p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking agroforestry with indigenous care, reciprocity, and long-term relationships in coffee territories\",\"authors\":\"Joao Gabriel Rodrigues Telles Almeida,&nbsp;Lorena Soto-Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10457-025-01263-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article explores Indigenous agroforestry systems in the Mesoamerican coffee territories of Chiapas, Mexico, emphasizing their relational, aesthetic, and ontological dimensions. Based on a 4-years transdisciplinary research process using the Extended Case Method, the study analyzes how coffee agroforestry systems are not merely productive or ecological arrangements, but living territories sustained by multispecies networks of care, reciprocity, and co-production between humans and more-than-human beings. Drawing on fieldwork with peasant and Indigenous families, the concept of socio-environmental mutualism is proposed to describe these relational dynamics, which challenge the anthropocentric and functionalist frameworks that dominate agroforestry science and policy. The findings suggest that long-term adherence to agroforestry systems cannot be explained solely by technical or economic variables, but requires recognizing the affective, ethical, and intersubjective relationships that families establish with the land and its beings. The article argues that reimagining agroforestry from this relational perspective opens new possibilities for strengthening territorial resilience, provided that such efforts respect the situated ontologies and knowledge systems that sustain these practices. The study concludes by calling for transdisciplinary methodologies that integrate multispecies ethnography, affective and relational measures, and participatory processes to expand the dialogue between scientific, peasant, and Indigenous knowledge. </p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"volume\":\"99 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01263-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01263-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了墨西哥恰帕斯州中美洲咖啡地区的土著农林业系统,强调了它们的关系、美学和本体论维度。基于一项为期4年的跨学科研究过程,使用扩展案例法,该研究分析了咖啡农林复合系统如何不仅仅是生产或生态安排,而是由人类和非人类之间的多物种关怀、互惠和共同生产网络维持的生活领域。通过对农民和土著家庭的实地调查,作者提出了社会环境共生的概念来描述这些关系动态,这些动态挑战了主导农林业科学和政策的人类中心主义和功能主义框架。研究结果表明,长期坚持农林复合系统不能仅仅用技术或经济变量来解释,而是需要认识到家庭与土地及其生物建立的情感、伦理和主体间关系。本文认为,从这种关系的角度重新构想农林业,为加强地域恢复力开辟了新的可能性,前提是这种努力尊重维持这些做法的位置本体和知识系统。该研究最后呼吁采用跨学科的方法,将多物种人种学、情感和关系测量以及参与性过程结合起来,以扩大科学、农民和土著知识之间的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking agroforestry with indigenous care, reciprocity, and long-term relationships in coffee territories

This article explores Indigenous agroforestry systems in the Mesoamerican coffee territories of Chiapas, Mexico, emphasizing their relational, aesthetic, and ontological dimensions. Based on a 4-years transdisciplinary research process using the Extended Case Method, the study analyzes how coffee agroforestry systems are not merely productive or ecological arrangements, but living territories sustained by multispecies networks of care, reciprocity, and co-production between humans and more-than-human beings. Drawing on fieldwork with peasant and Indigenous families, the concept of socio-environmental mutualism is proposed to describe these relational dynamics, which challenge the anthropocentric and functionalist frameworks that dominate agroforestry science and policy. The findings suggest that long-term adherence to agroforestry systems cannot be explained solely by technical or economic variables, but requires recognizing the affective, ethical, and intersubjective relationships that families establish with the land and its beings. The article argues that reimagining agroforestry from this relational perspective opens new possibilities for strengthening territorial resilience, provided that such efforts respect the situated ontologies and knowledge systems that sustain these practices. The study concludes by calling for transdisciplinary methodologies that integrate multispecies ethnography, affective and relational measures, and participatory processes to expand the dialogue between scientific, peasant, and Indigenous knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信