职场社交网络中非正式社会地位与八卦的共同演化

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Emily Kruidhof , Rense Corten , Lea Ellwardt , Rafael Wittek
{"title":"职场社交网络中非正式社会地位与八卦的共同演化","authors":"Emily Kruidhof ,&nbsp;Rense Corten ,&nbsp;Lea Ellwardt ,&nbsp;Rafael Wittek","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2025.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the co-evolution of informal social status and the three positions in a gossip triad – gossip senders, receivers, and objects – in the workplace. Two different social mechanisms are proposed to explain these interrelationships, suggesting relationships between gossip and informal social status in the opposite direction. First, the social bonding perspective suggests that gossip bonds between actors in a gossip triad shape their informal social status. Second, the social capital perspective indicates that employees’ informal social status leads to their position within gossip triads. The hypotheses are tested in a three-wave social network study among employees in a Dutch childcare organization. Results of stochastic actor-oriented models indicate a co-evolution between informal social status and the receiver’s role in a gossip triad, but not with the roles of sender and object. Contrary to what the social capital perspective predicts, employees’ informal social status negatively affects receiving gossip over time. In line with the social bonding perspective, receiving gossip positively affects informal social status over time. The co-evolution process suggests that over time, an equilibrium may emerge where an employee’s informal social status stabilizes at a point where enough gossip is received to sustain their social position. We conclude that the previously often neglected receivers of third-party information should be considered when examining the dynamics of workplace gossip.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 9-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The co-evolution of informal social status and gossip in workplace social networks\",\"authors\":\"Emily Kruidhof ,&nbsp;Rense Corten ,&nbsp;Lea Ellwardt ,&nbsp;Rafael Wittek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socnet.2025.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the co-evolution of informal social status and the three positions in a gossip triad – gossip senders, receivers, and objects – in the workplace. Two different social mechanisms are proposed to explain these interrelationships, suggesting relationships between gossip and informal social status in the opposite direction. First, the social bonding perspective suggests that gossip bonds between actors in a gossip triad shape their informal social status. Second, the social capital perspective indicates that employees’ informal social status leads to their position within gossip triads. The hypotheses are tested in a three-wave social network study among employees in a Dutch childcare organization. Results of stochastic actor-oriented models indicate a co-evolution between informal social status and the receiver’s role in a gossip triad, but not with the roles of sender and object. Contrary to what the social capital perspective predicts, employees’ informal social status negatively affects receiving gossip over time. In line with the social bonding perspective, receiving gossip positively affects informal social status over time. The co-evolution process suggests that over time, an equilibrium may emerge where an employee’s informal social status stabilizes at a point where enough gossip is received to sustain their social position. We conclude that the previously often neglected receivers of third-party information should be considered when examining the dynamics of workplace gossip.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Networks\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 9-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873325000474\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873325000474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了非正式社会地位和职场八卦三位一体中的三个位置——八卦发送者、接受者和对象——的共同演变。研究人员提出了两种不同的社会机制来解释这些相互关系,表明八卦与非正式社会地位之间的关系是相反的。首先,社会联系观点表明,八卦三位一体中的演员之间的八卦联系塑造了他们的非正式社会地位。第二,社会资本视角表明,员工的非正式社会地位导致其在八卦黑社会中的地位。这些假设在荷兰一家托儿机构的员工中进行了三波社交网络研究。随机因素导向模型的结果表明,非正式社会地位与八卦三元组中的接受者角色之间存在共同演化,但与发送者和对象角色之间没有共同演化。与社会资本观点的预测相反,随着时间的推移,员工的非正式社会地位会对接受八卦产生负面影响。根据社会关系的观点,随着时间的推移,接受八卦对非正式的社会地位有积极的影响。共同进化过程表明,随着时间的推移,一种平衡可能会出现,员工的非正式社会地位稳定在一个点上,在这个点上,有足够的八卦来维持他们的社会地位。我们的结论是,在研究职场八卦的动态时,应该考虑到以前经常被忽视的第三方信息的接收者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The co-evolution of informal social status and gossip in workplace social networks
This study examines the co-evolution of informal social status and the three positions in a gossip triad – gossip senders, receivers, and objects – in the workplace. Two different social mechanisms are proposed to explain these interrelationships, suggesting relationships between gossip and informal social status in the opposite direction. First, the social bonding perspective suggests that gossip bonds between actors in a gossip triad shape their informal social status. Second, the social capital perspective indicates that employees’ informal social status leads to their position within gossip triads. The hypotheses are tested in a three-wave social network study among employees in a Dutch childcare organization. Results of stochastic actor-oriented models indicate a co-evolution between informal social status and the receiver’s role in a gossip triad, but not with the roles of sender and object. Contrary to what the social capital perspective predicts, employees’ informal social status negatively affects receiving gossip over time. In line with the social bonding perspective, receiving gossip positively affects informal social status over time. The co-evolution process suggests that over time, an equilibrium may emerge where an employee’s informal social status stabilizes at a point where enough gossip is received to sustain their social position. We conclude that the previously often neglected receivers of third-party information should be considered when examining the dynamics of workplace gossip.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信