晚期胰腺导管腺癌化疗效果的真实证据:吉西他滨联合nab-紫杉醇治疗中TP53状态的预后意义

M. Sugimori , A. Hirotani , H. Yamazaki , M. Oshi , K. Kawashima , H. Tsuchiya , Y. Kanemaru , Y. Suzuki , S. Onodera , H. Miwa , A. Nozaki , K. Sugimori , C. Kunisaki , M. Kudo , M. Morimoto , S. Maeda
{"title":"晚期胰腺导管腺癌化疗效果的真实证据:吉西他滨联合nab-紫杉醇治疗中TP53状态的预后意义","authors":"M. Sugimori ,&nbsp;A. Hirotani ,&nbsp;H. Yamazaki ,&nbsp;M. Oshi ,&nbsp;K. Kawashima ,&nbsp;H. Tsuchiya ,&nbsp;Y. Kanemaru ,&nbsp;Y. Suzuki ,&nbsp;S. Onodera ,&nbsp;H. Miwa ,&nbsp;A. Nozaki ,&nbsp;K. Sugimori ,&nbsp;C. Kunisaki ,&nbsp;M. Kudo ,&nbsp;M. Morimoto ,&nbsp;S. Maeda","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) therapies are widely used to treat advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors associated with these regimens, focusing on key genomic alterations in the ‘Big Four’ genes (<em>KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A,</em> and <em>SMAD4</em>).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational study analysed real-world data from 5205 PDAC patients registered in the national database, Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT), who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling between June 2019 and December 2023 in Japan. Clinical characteristics and genomic alterations were analysed. Time to progression (TTP) was compared between patients treated with GnP or FFX as first-line therapy. Gene alterations were classified as truncating or missense mutations to assess prognostic relevance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>GnP was more frequently selected than FFX as first-line treatment (2315 versus 1181). FFX was more commonly used in younger, male patients without prior adjuvant therapy. After matching for age, sex, and adjuvant history, GnP demonstrated superior TTP compared with FFX (median TTP: 6.0 versus 5.5 months, <em>P</em> = 0.019). In the GnP group, <em>TP53</em> alterations were associated with significantly shorter TTP compared with wild-type <em>TP53</em> (median TTP: 5.8 versus 7.0 months; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). Furthermore, truncating <em>TP53</em> mutations were linked to shorter TTP than missense mutations (median TTP: 5.3 versus 5.9 months; <em>P</em> = 0.021).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In Japanese real-world data, GnP showed superior TTP compared with FFX for advanced PDAC. <em>TP53</em> status may serve as a prognostic biomarker in patients receiving GnP therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world evidence of chemotherapy effects in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: prognostic significance of TP53 status in gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy\",\"authors\":\"M. Sugimori ,&nbsp;A. Hirotani ,&nbsp;H. Yamazaki ,&nbsp;M. Oshi ,&nbsp;K. Kawashima ,&nbsp;H. Tsuchiya ,&nbsp;Y. Kanemaru ,&nbsp;Y. Suzuki ,&nbsp;S. Onodera ,&nbsp;H. Miwa ,&nbsp;A. Nozaki ,&nbsp;K. Sugimori ,&nbsp;C. Kunisaki ,&nbsp;M. Kudo ,&nbsp;M. Morimoto ,&nbsp;S. Maeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) therapies are widely used to treat advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors associated with these regimens, focusing on key genomic alterations in the ‘Big Four’ genes (<em>KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A,</em> and <em>SMAD4</em>).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational study analysed real-world data from 5205 PDAC patients registered in the national database, Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT), who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling between June 2019 and December 2023 in Japan. Clinical characteristics and genomic alterations were analysed. Time to progression (TTP) was compared between patients treated with GnP or FFX as first-line therapy. Gene alterations were classified as truncating or missense mutations to assess prognostic relevance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>GnP was more frequently selected than FFX as first-line treatment (2315 versus 1181). FFX was more commonly used in younger, male patients without prior adjuvant therapy. After matching for age, sex, and adjuvant history, GnP demonstrated superior TTP compared with FFX (median TTP: 6.0 versus 5.5 months, <em>P</em> = 0.019). In the GnP group, <em>TP53</em> alterations were associated with significantly shorter TTP compared with wild-type <em>TP53</em> (median TTP: 5.8 versus 7.0 months; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). Furthermore, truncating <em>TP53</em> mutations were linked to shorter TTP than missense mutations (median TTP: 5.3 versus 5.9 months; <em>P</em> = 0.021).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In Japanese real-world data, GnP showed superior TTP compared with FFX for advanced PDAC. <em>TP53</em> status may serve as a prognostic biomarker in patients receiving GnP therapy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819825000901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819825000901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

吉西他滨联合nab-紫杉醇(GnP)和FOLFIRINOX (FFX)疗法被广泛用于治疗晚期胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)。本研究旨在确定与这些方案相关的预后因素,重点关注“四大”基因(KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A和SMAD4)的关键基因组改变。材料和方法这项回顾性观察性研究分析了在国家数据库癌症基因组学和高级治疗中心(C-CAT)注册的5205名PDAC患者的真实数据,这些患者在2019年6月至2023年12月期间在日本进行了全面的基因组分析。分析临床特征和基因组改变。比较了一线治疗采用GnP或FFX的患者的进展时间(TTP)。基因改变被分类为截断或错义突变,以评估预后相关性。结果选择gnp作为一线治疗的频率高于选择FFX (2315 vs 1181)。FFX更常用于未接受辅助治疗的年轻男性患者。在匹配年龄、性别和辅助史后,GnP显示TTP优于FFX(中位TTP: 6.0个月vs 5.5个月,P = 0.019)。在GnP组中,与野生型TP53相比,TP53改变与TTP显著缩短相关(中位TTP: 5.8个月对7.0个月;P & lt;0.0001)。此外,截断TP53突变比错义突变与更短的TTP相关(中位TTP: 5.3个月对5.9个月;P = 0.021)。结论在日本的实际数据中,与FFX相比,GnP在晚期PDAC中显示出更好的TTP。TP53状态可作为接受化疗患者的预后生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world evidence of chemotherapy effects in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: prognostic significance of TP53 status in gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy

Background

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) therapies are widely used to treat advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors associated with these regimens, focusing on key genomic alterations in the ‘Big Four’ genes (KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4).

Materials and methods

This retrospective observational study analysed real-world data from 5205 PDAC patients registered in the national database, Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT), who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling between June 2019 and December 2023 in Japan. Clinical characteristics and genomic alterations were analysed. Time to progression (TTP) was compared between patients treated with GnP or FFX as first-line therapy. Gene alterations were classified as truncating or missense mutations to assess prognostic relevance.

Results

GnP was more frequently selected than FFX as first-line treatment (2315 versus 1181). FFX was more commonly used in younger, male patients without prior adjuvant therapy. After matching for age, sex, and adjuvant history, GnP demonstrated superior TTP compared with FFX (median TTP: 6.0 versus 5.5 months, P = 0.019). In the GnP group, TP53 alterations were associated with significantly shorter TTP compared with wild-type TP53 (median TTP: 5.8 versus 7.0 months; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, truncating TP53 mutations were linked to shorter TTP than missense mutations (median TTP: 5.3 versus 5.9 months; P = 0.021).

Conclusions

In Japanese real-world data, GnP showed superior TTP compared with FFX for advanced PDAC. TP53 status may serve as a prognostic biomarker in patients receiving GnP therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信