Lavisha S. Punjabi MBBS, FRCPath, FRCPA, MIAC , Wen-Bin Luo MD , Joey Yan Leng Tan MBBS , Han Ning Yee MD , Jason Kiat Soon Chng MBBS , Xiaozhu Zhang MBBS, PhD , Po Yin Tang MBBS, BMedSc, FRCPA, FRCPath
{"title":"用于教学和学习的数字幻灯片:学员和老师怎么想?在一个学术医疗中心进行的问卷调查研究","authors":"Lavisha S. Punjabi MBBS, FRCPath, FRCPA, MIAC , Wen-Bin Luo MD , Joey Yan Leng Tan MBBS , Han Ning Yee MD , Jason Kiat Soon Chng MBBS , Xiaozhu Zhang MBBS, PhD , Po Yin Tang MBBS, BMedSc, FRCPA, FRCPath","doi":"10.1016/j.acpath.2025.100214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, there has been a gradual increase in adoption of digital pathology tools in postgraduate pathology training in Singapore. Trainees’ and faculty members’ utilisation and preferences regarding digital pathology tools for teaching and learning were hitherto unknown in Singapore. Hence, the aim of this observational study was to explore trainees’ and faculty members’ attitudes and perceptions towards the adoption of digital pathology tools for pathology education, and to guide institutional decisions on digital pathology resources to develop and/or invest in. A questionnaire was distributed to faculty members and trainees. Twenty-three responses from trainees and 10 responses from faculty members (“teachers”) were received. The results showed no significant difference in trainees’ use of physical and digital teaching slides (<em>P</em> = 0.456). However, the trainees and teachers were not satisfied with the current physical teaching slide sets mainly due to faded staining (47.8 % of trainees and 28.6 % of faculty). In terms of digital platforms, the respondents preferred certain digital slide viewers because of image loading speed. Respondents preferred the digital slides with annotations and explanation of features (81.8 %), in addition to the final diagnoses (90.9 %). In conclusion, this study provides direction for tailoring digital resources for trainees and teachers at our centre, which may be extrapolated to academic medical centres nationally and regionally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44927,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pathology","volume":"12 3","pages":"Article 100214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital slide sets for teaching and learning: what do trainees and teachers think? A questionnaire study at an academic medical centre\",\"authors\":\"Lavisha S. Punjabi MBBS, FRCPath, FRCPA, MIAC , Wen-Bin Luo MD , Joey Yan Leng Tan MBBS , Han Ning Yee MD , Jason Kiat Soon Chng MBBS , Xiaozhu Zhang MBBS, PhD , Po Yin Tang MBBS, BMedSc, FRCPA, FRCPath\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acpath.2025.100214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In recent years, there has been a gradual increase in adoption of digital pathology tools in postgraduate pathology training in Singapore. Trainees’ and faculty members’ utilisation and preferences regarding digital pathology tools for teaching and learning were hitherto unknown in Singapore. Hence, the aim of this observational study was to explore trainees’ and faculty members’ attitudes and perceptions towards the adoption of digital pathology tools for pathology education, and to guide institutional decisions on digital pathology resources to develop and/or invest in. A questionnaire was distributed to faculty members and trainees. Twenty-three responses from trainees and 10 responses from faculty members (“teachers”) were received. The results showed no significant difference in trainees’ use of physical and digital teaching slides (<em>P</em> = 0.456). However, the trainees and teachers were not satisfied with the current physical teaching slide sets mainly due to faded staining (47.8 % of trainees and 28.6 % of faculty). In terms of digital platforms, the respondents preferred certain digital slide viewers because of image loading speed. Respondents preferred the digital slides with annotations and explanation of features (81.8 %), in addition to the final diagnoses (90.9 %). In conclusion, this study provides direction for tailoring digital resources for trainees and teachers at our centre, which may be extrapolated to academic medical centres nationally and regionally.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pathology\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2374289525000569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2374289525000569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital slide sets for teaching and learning: what do trainees and teachers think? A questionnaire study at an academic medical centre
In recent years, there has been a gradual increase in adoption of digital pathology tools in postgraduate pathology training in Singapore. Trainees’ and faculty members’ utilisation and preferences regarding digital pathology tools for teaching and learning were hitherto unknown in Singapore. Hence, the aim of this observational study was to explore trainees’ and faculty members’ attitudes and perceptions towards the adoption of digital pathology tools for pathology education, and to guide institutional decisions on digital pathology resources to develop and/or invest in. A questionnaire was distributed to faculty members and trainees. Twenty-three responses from trainees and 10 responses from faculty members (“teachers”) were received. The results showed no significant difference in trainees’ use of physical and digital teaching slides (P = 0.456). However, the trainees and teachers were not satisfied with the current physical teaching slide sets mainly due to faded staining (47.8 % of trainees and 28.6 % of faculty). In terms of digital platforms, the respondents preferred certain digital slide viewers because of image loading speed. Respondents preferred the digital slides with annotations and explanation of features (81.8 %), in addition to the final diagnoses (90.9 %). In conclusion, this study provides direction for tailoring digital resources for trainees and teachers at our centre, which may be extrapolated to academic medical centres nationally and regionally.
期刊介绍:
Academic Pathology is an open access journal sponsored by the Association of Pathology Chairs, established to give voice to the innovations in leadership and management of academic departments of Pathology. These innovations may have impact across the breadth of pathology and laboratory medicine practice. Academic Pathology addresses methods for improving patient care (clinical informatics, genomic testing and data management, lab automation, electronic health record integration, and annotate biorepositories); best practices in inter-professional clinical partnerships; innovative pedagogical approaches to medical education and educational program evaluation in pathology; models for training academic pathologists and advancing academic career development; administrative and organizational models supporting the discipline; and leadership development in academic medical centers, health systems, and other relevant venues. Intended authorship and audiences for Academic Pathology are international and reach beyond academic pathology itself, including but not limited to healthcare providers, educators, researchers, and policy-makers.