产科培训中的教育公平:妇产科见习的程序差异。

IF 2.1
Journal of surgical education Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103614
Melissa R Rosen, Brooke E Schroeder, Katherine A Lambert, Norma Davis, Lena Fried, Deborah Engle, Melody Baldwin, Sarah K Dotters-Katz
{"title":"产科培训中的教育公平:妇产科见习的程序差异。","authors":"Melissa R Rosen, Brooke E Schroeder, Katherine A Lambert, Norma Davis, Lena Fried, Deborah Engle, Melody Baldwin, Sarah K Dotters-Katz","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess for differences in obstetric procedural experiences on the obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) clerkship based on medical student race and gender.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of medical student case logs on their OB/GYN clerkship between 2014 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single United States allopathic medical school, with clinical rotations at a tertiary care center-Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina PARTICIPANTS: 918 medical students who completed their OB/GYN clerkship between 2014 and 2022. Students with missing race or gender data from the information shared by the Assistant Dean of Education were excluded, resulting in a total of 869 students included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 869 students included in the study, 59.0% were female and 23.9% identified as underrepresented minorities in medicine (URM). There were no significant differences in \"hands-on\" experience in vaginal or cesarean deliveries based on medical student race or gender. However, URM male students participated in 0.74 fewer vaginal deliveries (95% CI: -1.35 to -0.12) and 1 less total delivery (95% CI: -1.91 to -0.07) than non-URM female students, while non-URM male students participated in 0.45 fewer vaginal deliveries (95% CI: -0.87 to -0.03) than non-URM female peers. These results were obtained while controlling for differences based on academic year and clerkship timing within the academic year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No differences were noted in \"hands-on\" delivery experience during the OB/GYN clerkship based on medical student gender or URM status, however subgroup analyses revealed that URM and non-URM male students participated in fewer vaginal deliveries compared to non-URM female peers. These differences, although modest, highlight potential disparities in clinical exposure and inclusion in the learning environment, warranting further investigation and underscoring the need for continued efforts to ensure equitable learning opportunities for all students.</p>","PeriodicalId":94109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical education","volume":"82 10","pages":"103614"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Equity in Obstetric Training: Procedural Disparities in the Ob/Gyn Clerkship.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa R Rosen, Brooke E Schroeder, Katherine A Lambert, Norma Davis, Lena Fried, Deborah Engle, Melody Baldwin, Sarah K Dotters-Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess for differences in obstetric procedural experiences on the obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) clerkship based on medical student race and gender.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of medical student case logs on their OB/GYN clerkship between 2014 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single United States allopathic medical school, with clinical rotations at a tertiary care center-Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina PARTICIPANTS: 918 medical students who completed their OB/GYN clerkship between 2014 and 2022. Students with missing race or gender data from the information shared by the Assistant Dean of Education were excluded, resulting in a total of 869 students included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 869 students included in the study, 59.0% were female and 23.9% identified as underrepresented minorities in medicine (URM). There were no significant differences in \\\"hands-on\\\" experience in vaginal or cesarean deliveries based on medical student race or gender. However, URM male students participated in 0.74 fewer vaginal deliveries (95% CI: -1.35 to -0.12) and 1 less total delivery (95% CI: -1.91 to -0.07) than non-URM female students, while non-URM male students participated in 0.45 fewer vaginal deliveries (95% CI: -0.87 to -0.03) than non-URM female peers. These results were obtained while controlling for differences based on academic year and clerkship timing within the academic year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No differences were noted in \\\"hands-on\\\" delivery experience during the OB/GYN clerkship based on medical student gender or URM status, however subgroup analyses revealed that URM and non-URM male students participated in fewer vaginal deliveries compared to non-URM female peers. These differences, although modest, highlight potential disparities in clinical exposure and inclusion in the learning environment, warranting further investigation and underscoring the need for continued efforts to ensure equitable learning opportunities for all students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical education\",\"volume\":\"82 10\",\"pages\":\"103614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨医学生种族和性别对妇产科见习医师产科手术经验的差异。设计:经irb批准的回顾性队列研究,对2014年至2022年医学生在妇产科实习期间的病例记录进行研究。环境:单一的美国对抗疗法医学院,在三级护理中心进行临床轮转-杜克大学医学院,达勒姆,北卡罗来纳州参与者:918名在2014年至2022年间完成妇产科实习的医学生。在教育副院长分享的信息中缺少种族或性别数据的学生被排除在外,结果总共有869名学生被纳入分析。结果:在纳入研究的869名学生中,59.0%为女性,23.9%为医学中代表性不足的少数民族(URM)。根据医学生的种族和性别,阴道分娩或剖宫产的“实际操作”经验没有显著差异。然而,URM的男学生比非URM的女学生阴道分娩少0.74次(95% CI: -1.35至-0.12),总分娩少1次(95% CI: -1.91至-0.07),而非URM的男学生比非URM的女同学阴道分娩少0.45次(95% CI: -0.87至-0.03)。这些结果是在控制了基于学年和学年内实习时间的差异后得出的。结论:在妇产科实习期间,医学生性别或URM状态在“实际”分娩经验方面没有差异,但亚组分析显示,URM和非URM的男学生与非URM的女学生相比,参与阴道分娩的次数较少。这些差异虽然不大,但突出了临床接触和学习环境融入方面的潜在差异,需要进一步调查,并强调需要继续努力确保所有学生的公平学习机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational Equity in Obstetric Training: Procedural Disparities in the Ob/Gyn Clerkship.

Objective: To assess for differences in obstetric procedural experiences on the obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) clerkship based on medical student race and gender.

Design: IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of medical student case logs on their OB/GYN clerkship between 2014 and 2022.

Setting: Single United States allopathic medical school, with clinical rotations at a tertiary care center-Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina PARTICIPANTS: 918 medical students who completed their OB/GYN clerkship between 2014 and 2022. Students with missing race or gender data from the information shared by the Assistant Dean of Education were excluded, resulting in a total of 869 students included in the analysis.

Results: Among 869 students included in the study, 59.0% were female and 23.9% identified as underrepresented minorities in medicine (URM). There were no significant differences in "hands-on" experience in vaginal or cesarean deliveries based on medical student race or gender. However, URM male students participated in 0.74 fewer vaginal deliveries (95% CI: -1.35 to -0.12) and 1 less total delivery (95% CI: -1.91 to -0.07) than non-URM female students, while non-URM male students participated in 0.45 fewer vaginal deliveries (95% CI: -0.87 to -0.03) than non-URM female peers. These results were obtained while controlling for differences based on academic year and clerkship timing within the academic year.

Conclusions: No differences were noted in "hands-on" delivery experience during the OB/GYN clerkship based on medical student gender or URM status, however subgroup analyses revealed that URM and non-URM male students participated in fewer vaginal deliveries compared to non-URM female peers. These differences, although modest, highlight potential disparities in clinical exposure and inclusion in the learning environment, warranting further investigation and underscoring the need for continued efforts to ensure equitable learning opportunities for all students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信