在考虑普通外科住院医师项目的申请人时,使用complex - usa绩效。

IF 2.1
Jeanne M Sandella, Grace Young, John R Boulet, Kristen Conrad-Schnetz
{"title":"在考虑普通外科住院医师项目的申请人时,使用complex - usa绩效。","authors":"Jeanne M Sandella, Grace Young, John R Boulet, Kristen Conrad-Schnetz","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the relationships between performance on the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA), administered to osteopathic medical students, and performance on American Board of Surgery (ABS) in-training (ABSITE) and board certification examinations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and logistic regression were employed to investigate the relationships between performance on COMLEX (Level 1, Level 2-cognitive evaluation [CE]) and the ABSITE, ABS qualifying examination (QE). Scaled scores and pass/fail status were available for COMLEX Level 1 and Level 2-CE. Scaled scores were also available for all 5 ABSITE examinations (PGY1-PGY5) and ABS QE.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The investigation was based on historical data shared between the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) and ABS.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study cohort included 2300 graduates of osteopathic medical colleges who were currently enrolled in or had completed a general surgery residency program. All participants had taken at least one ABSITE examination between 2016 and 2023. Of these, 654 had attempted the ABS QE at least once.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both COMLEX Level 1 and Level 2-CE scores were predictive of ABSITE performance (r = 0.42-0.51). Osteopathic students who failed Level 1 or Level 2-CE had significantly lower first attempt scores on ABS QE. The COMLEX Level 2-CE first attempt score explained 28% of the variance of the ABS QE first attempt score. Based on the logistic regression analysis, a score of 550 on Level 2-CE was associated with a predicted probability of passing ABS QE of 0.91.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from this investigation indicate that COMLEX performance is predictive of ABS in-training and board certification performance. If program directors continue to use licensing examination performance as part of holistic review of potential residency candidates, they should reference COMLEX for osteopathic medical school graduates. Given the strong association between Level 2-CE scores and first attempt passing probability on ABS QE, requiring osteopathic graduates to take United States Medical Licensing Examination Steps does not add value.</p>","PeriodicalId":94109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical education","volume":" ","pages":"103642"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of COMLEX-USA Performance When Considering DO Applicants to General Surgery Residency Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Jeanne M Sandella, Grace Young, John R Boulet, Kristen Conrad-Schnetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the relationships between performance on the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA), administered to osteopathic medical students, and performance on American Board of Surgery (ABS) in-training (ABSITE) and board certification examinations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and logistic regression were employed to investigate the relationships between performance on COMLEX (Level 1, Level 2-cognitive evaluation [CE]) and the ABSITE, ABS qualifying examination (QE). Scaled scores and pass/fail status were available for COMLEX Level 1 and Level 2-CE. Scaled scores were also available for all 5 ABSITE examinations (PGY1-PGY5) and ABS QE.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The investigation was based on historical data shared between the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) and ABS.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study cohort included 2300 graduates of osteopathic medical colleges who were currently enrolled in or had completed a general surgery residency program. All participants had taken at least one ABSITE examination between 2016 and 2023. Of these, 654 had attempted the ABS QE at least once.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both COMLEX Level 1 and Level 2-CE scores were predictive of ABSITE performance (r = 0.42-0.51). Osteopathic students who failed Level 1 or Level 2-CE had significantly lower first attempt scores on ABS QE. The COMLEX Level 2-CE first attempt score explained 28% of the variance of the ABS QE first attempt score. Based on the logistic regression analysis, a score of 550 on Level 2-CE was associated with a predicted probability of passing ABS QE of 0.91.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from this investigation indicate that COMLEX performance is predictive of ABS in-training and board certification performance. If program directors continue to use licensing examination performance as part of holistic review of potential residency candidates, they should reference COMLEX for osteopathic medical school graduates. Given the strong association between Level 2-CE scores and first attempt passing probability on ABS QE, requiring osteopathic graduates to take United States Medical Licensing Examination Steps does not add value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"103642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本调查的目的是量化骨科医学学生在综合骨科医师执照考试(complex - usa)中的表现与在美国外科委员会(ABS)培训(ABSITE)和委员会认证考试中的表现之间的关系。设计:采用描述性统计、Pearson相关性和逻辑回归来研究complex (Level 1, Level 2认知评价[CE])和ABSITE, ABS资格考试(QE)成绩之间的关系。complex 1级和2级ce的比例分数和合格/不合格状态可用。ABSITE所有5项考试(PGY1-PGY5)和ABS QE的评分也可用。背景:调查基于国家骨科医学检查委员会(NBOME)和abs之间共享的历史数据。参与者:研究队列包括2300名骨科医学院的毕业生,他们目前正在或已经完成了普通外科住院医师项目。所有参与者在2016年至2023年期间至少参加过一次ABSITE考试。其中,654个国家至少尝试过一次ABS量化宽松。结果:complex Level 1和Level 2 ce评分均可预测ABSITE的表现(r = 0.42-0.51)。未通过1级或2级ce的整骨疗法学生在ABS QE上的第一次尝试得分明显较低。complex Level 2-CE第一次尝试得分解释了ABS QE第一次尝试得分28%的方差。根据logistic回归分析,Level 2-CE得分为550分,ABS量化宽松通过的预测概率为0.91。结论:本研究结果表明,complex绩效对ABS培训绩效和董事会认证绩效具有预测作用。如果项目主管继续使用执照考试成绩作为潜在住院医师候选人整体审查的一部分,他们应该参考骨科医学院毕业生的complex。考虑到2级ce分数与ABS QE的第一次尝试通过概率之间的强烈关联,要求骨科毕业生参加美国医疗执照考试步骤并不会增加价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of COMLEX-USA Performance When Considering DO Applicants to General Surgery Residency Programs.

Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the relationships between performance on the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA), administered to osteopathic medical students, and performance on American Board of Surgery (ABS) in-training (ABSITE) and board certification examinations.

Design: Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and logistic regression were employed to investigate the relationships between performance on COMLEX (Level 1, Level 2-cognitive evaluation [CE]) and the ABSITE, ABS qualifying examination (QE). Scaled scores and pass/fail status were available for COMLEX Level 1 and Level 2-CE. Scaled scores were also available for all 5 ABSITE examinations (PGY1-PGY5) and ABS QE.

Setting: The investigation was based on historical data shared between the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) and ABS.

Participants: The study cohort included 2300 graduates of osteopathic medical colleges who were currently enrolled in or had completed a general surgery residency program. All participants had taken at least one ABSITE examination between 2016 and 2023. Of these, 654 had attempted the ABS QE at least once.

Results: Both COMLEX Level 1 and Level 2-CE scores were predictive of ABSITE performance (r = 0.42-0.51). Osteopathic students who failed Level 1 or Level 2-CE had significantly lower first attempt scores on ABS QE. The COMLEX Level 2-CE first attempt score explained 28% of the variance of the ABS QE first attempt score. Based on the logistic regression analysis, a score of 550 on Level 2-CE was associated with a predicted probability of passing ABS QE of 0.91.

Conclusions: The results from this investigation indicate that COMLEX performance is predictive of ABS in-training and board certification performance. If program directors continue to use licensing examination performance as part of holistic review of potential residency candidates, they should reference COMLEX for osteopathic medical school graduates. Given the strong association between Level 2-CE scores and first attempt passing probability on ABS QE, requiring osteopathic graduates to take United States Medical Licensing Examination Steps does not add value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信