Omer Karrar, Hagop Kantarjian, Fadi G Haddad, Roberta S Azevedo, Ghayas Issa, Farhad Ravandi, Koji Sasaki, Jayastu Senapati, Hussein Abbas, Sara Dellasala, Elias Jabbour, Nicholas J Short
{"title":"以波纳替尼为基础的治疗在髓细胞期慢性髓性白血病患者的复发的结果和模式。","authors":"Omer Karrar, Hagop Kantarjian, Fadi G Haddad, Roberta S Azevedo, Ghayas Issa, Farhad Ravandi, Koji Sasaki, Jayastu Senapati, Hussein Abbas, Sara Dellasala, Elias Jabbour, Nicholas J Short","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2025.2542946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We analyzed 76 patients who received a ponatinib-based regimen, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, for chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast phase (CML-MBP). The rate of morphological remission with or without count recovery (i.e. overall response rate [ORR]) was 49%. Patients who received a ponatinib-based regimen as their first therapy for CML-MBP had better ORR than those received ponatinib as salvage (60% versus 27%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.006). ORR was also higher with ponatinib combination therapy than monotherapy (54% versus 29%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.06). For the entire cohort, the median RFS and OS were 11.9 and 8.5 months, respectively. Responding patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT had superior outcomes to those who did not (2-year OS 79% versus 38%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.05). After ponatinib failure, outcomes were dismal (median OS: 3.9 months). Ponatinib-based regimens are effective in CML-MBP, especially when used as first therapy and in combination with chemotherapy, followed by HSCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes and patterns of relapse with ponatinib-based therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast phase.\",\"authors\":\"Omer Karrar, Hagop Kantarjian, Fadi G Haddad, Roberta S Azevedo, Ghayas Issa, Farhad Ravandi, Koji Sasaki, Jayastu Senapati, Hussein Abbas, Sara Dellasala, Elias Jabbour, Nicholas J Short\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428194.2025.2542946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We analyzed 76 patients who received a ponatinib-based regimen, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, for chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast phase (CML-MBP). The rate of morphological remission with or without count recovery (i.e. overall response rate [ORR]) was 49%. Patients who received a ponatinib-based regimen as their first therapy for CML-MBP had better ORR than those received ponatinib as salvage (60% versus 27%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.006). ORR was also higher with ponatinib combination therapy than monotherapy (54% versus 29%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.06). For the entire cohort, the median RFS and OS were 11.9 and 8.5 months, respectively. Responding patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT had superior outcomes to those who did not (2-year OS 79% versus 38%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.05). After ponatinib failure, outcomes were dismal (median OS: 3.9 months). Ponatinib-based regimens are effective in CML-MBP, especially when used as first therapy and in combination with chemotherapy, followed by HSCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2542946\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2542946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes and patterns of relapse with ponatinib-based therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast phase.
We analyzed 76 patients who received a ponatinib-based regimen, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, for chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast phase (CML-MBP). The rate of morphological remission with or without count recovery (i.e. overall response rate [ORR]) was 49%. Patients who received a ponatinib-based regimen as their first therapy for CML-MBP had better ORR than those received ponatinib as salvage (60% versus 27%, respectively; p = 0.006). ORR was also higher with ponatinib combination therapy than monotherapy (54% versus 29%, respectively; p = 0.06). For the entire cohort, the median RFS and OS were 11.9 and 8.5 months, respectively. Responding patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT had superior outcomes to those who did not (2-year OS 79% versus 38%, respectively; p = 0.05). After ponatinib failure, outcomes were dismal (median OS: 3.9 months). Ponatinib-based regimens are effective in CML-MBP, especially when used as first therapy and in combination with chemotherapy, followed by HSCT.
期刊介绍:
Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor