S Cantellow, Ł Balcerzak, A Schyns-van den Berg, D Dabrowska, E Guasch, H Jörnvall, N Lucas, F J Mercier, C F Weiniger, P Krawczyk
{"title":"重症监护病房和出院后护理的产妇经验:MaCriCare研究的第三份报告。","authors":"S Cantellow, Ł Balcerzak, A Schyns-van den Berg, D Dabrowska, E Guasch, H Jörnvall, N Lucas, F J Mercier, C F Weiniger, P Krawczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric critical care patients face unique challenges during intensive care unit (ICU) admission, including separation from their newborns and psychological trauma. The ICU environment, primarily designed to support physiological recovery, may not be optimised for maternal experience. Healthcare staff caring for these patients may also experience psychological distress. This is the third report from the MaCriCare study, which examines maternal experiences, follow-up practices, and staff support provisions in ICUs managing obstetric patients across WHO Europe countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between September 1<sup>st</sup> 2021 and January 1<sup>st</sup> 2022, a multicentre international survey was conducted and included questions on mother-baby contact, breastfeeding support, single-room availability, psychological screening and follow-up, and psychological support for staff in ICUs serving obstetric units. Data from 928 ICUs were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physical contact was facilitated in 64.9% (n=602) of centres, while breastfeeding support was available in 82.2% (n=763). Single-room accommodation was accessible in 50%. Psychological screening for obstetric patients and follow-up were conducted in 30.6% (n=284) and 33.1% (n=307) of centres, respectively. In 61.7% (n=573) of ICUs, psychological support for staff was available following poor maternal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While breastfeeding support and some form of mother-baby contact were quite widely available, psychological screening, follow-up, and staff support after poor maternal outcomes remained inconsistent. National-level service mapping is needed to identify best practices and context-specific barriers. The impact of bundled interventions to improve maternal experience during critical illness, and staff support strategies after adverse maternal outcomes, should be formally evaluated in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"64 ","pages":"104737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal experience in the intensive care unit and Post-discharge care: the third report from the MaCriCare study.\",\"authors\":\"S Cantellow, Ł Balcerzak, A Schyns-van den Berg, D Dabrowska, E Guasch, H Jörnvall, N Lucas, F J Mercier, C F Weiniger, P Krawczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric critical care patients face unique challenges during intensive care unit (ICU) admission, including separation from their newborns and psychological trauma. The ICU environment, primarily designed to support physiological recovery, may not be optimised for maternal experience. Healthcare staff caring for these patients may also experience psychological distress. This is the third report from the MaCriCare study, which examines maternal experiences, follow-up practices, and staff support provisions in ICUs managing obstetric patients across WHO Europe countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between September 1<sup>st</sup> 2021 and January 1<sup>st</sup> 2022, a multicentre international survey was conducted and included questions on mother-baby contact, breastfeeding support, single-room availability, psychological screening and follow-up, and psychological support for staff in ICUs serving obstetric units. Data from 928 ICUs were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physical contact was facilitated in 64.9% (n=602) of centres, while breastfeeding support was available in 82.2% (n=763). Single-room accommodation was accessible in 50%. Psychological screening for obstetric patients and follow-up were conducted in 30.6% (n=284) and 33.1% (n=307) of centres, respectively. In 61.7% (n=573) of ICUs, psychological support for staff was available following poor maternal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While breastfeeding support and some form of mother-baby contact were quite widely available, psychological screening, follow-up, and staff support after poor maternal outcomes remained inconsistent. National-level service mapping is needed to identify best practices and context-specific barriers. The impact of bundled interventions to improve maternal experience during critical illness, and staff support strategies after adverse maternal outcomes, should be formally evaluated in future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"104737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104737\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Maternal experience in the intensive care unit and Post-discharge care: the third report from the MaCriCare study.
Background: Obstetric critical care patients face unique challenges during intensive care unit (ICU) admission, including separation from their newborns and psychological trauma. The ICU environment, primarily designed to support physiological recovery, may not be optimised for maternal experience. Healthcare staff caring for these patients may also experience psychological distress. This is the third report from the MaCriCare study, which examines maternal experiences, follow-up practices, and staff support provisions in ICUs managing obstetric patients across WHO Europe countries.
Methods: Between September 1st 2021 and January 1st 2022, a multicentre international survey was conducted and included questions on mother-baby contact, breastfeeding support, single-room availability, psychological screening and follow-up, and psychological support for staff in ICUs serving obstetric units. Data from 928 ICUs were analysed.
Results: Physical contact was facilitated in 64.9% (n=602) of centres, while breastfeeding support was available in 82.2% (n=763). Single-room accommodation was accessible in 50%. Psychological screening for obstetric patients and follow-up were conducted in 30.6% (n=284) and 33.1% (n=307) of centres, respectively. In 61.7% (n=573) of ICUs, psychological support for staff was available following poor maternal outcomes.
Conclusion: While breastfeeding support and some form of mother-baby contact were quite widely available, psychological screening, follow-up, and staff support after poor maternal outcomes remained inconsistent. National-level service mapping is needed to identify best practices and context-specific barriers. The impact of bundled interventions to improve maternal experience during critical illness, and staff support strategies after adverse maternal outcomes, should be formally evaluated in future research.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.