重症监护病房和出院后护理的产妇经验:MaCriCare研究的第三份报告。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
S Cantellow, Ł Balcerzak, A Schyns-van den Berg, D Dabrowska, E Guasch, H Jörnvall, N Lucas, F J Mercier, C F Weiniger, P Krawczyk
{"title":"重症监护病房和出院后护理的产妇经验:MaCriCare研究的第三份报告。","authors":"S Cantellow, Ł Balcerzak, A Schyns-van den Berg, D Dabrowska, E Guasch, H Jörnvall, N Lucas, F J Mercier, C F Weiniger, P Krawczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric critical care patients face unique challenges during intensive care unit (ICU) admission, including separation from their newborns and psychological trauma. The ICU environment, primarily designed to support physiological recovery, may not be optimised for maternal experience. Healthcare staff caring for these patients may also experience psychological distress. This is the third report from the MaCriCare study, which examines maternal experiences, follow-up practices, and staff support provisions in ICUs managing obstetric patients across WHO Europe countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between September 1<sup>st</sup> 2021 and January 1<sup>st</sup> 2022, a multicentre international survey was conducted and included questions on mother-baby contact, breastfeeding support, single-room availability, psychological screening and follow-up, and psychological support for staff in ICUs serving obstetric units. Data from 928 ICUs were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physical contact was facilitated in 64.9% (n=602) of centres, while breastfeeding support was available in 82.2% (n=763). Single-room accommodation was accessible in 50%. Psychological screening for obstetric patients and follow-up were conducted in 30.6% (n=284) and 33.1% (n=307) of centres, respectively. In 61.7% (n=573) of ICUs, psychological support for staff was available following poor maternal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While breastfeeding support and some form of mother-baby contact were quite widely available, psychological screening, follow-up, and staff support after poor maternal outcomes remained inconsistent. National-level service mapping is needed to identify best practices and context-specific barriers. The impact of bundled interventions to improve maternal experience during critical illness, and staff support strategies after adverse maternal outcomes, should be formally evaluated in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"64 ","pages":"104737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal experience in the intensive care unit and Post-discharge care: the third report from the MaCriCare study.\",\"authors\":\"S Cantellow, Ł Balcerzak, A Schyns-van den Berg, D Dabrowska, E Guasch, H Jörnvall, N Lucas, F J Mercier, C F Weiniger, P Krawczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric critical care patients face unique challenges during intensive care unit (ICU) admission, including separation from their newborns and psychological trauma. The ICU environment, primarily designed to support physiological recovery, may not be optimised for maternal experience. Healthcare staff caring for these patients may also experience psychological distress. This is the third report from the MaCriCare study, which examines maternal experiences, follow-up practices, and staff support provisions in ICUs managing obstetric patients across WHO Europe countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between September 1<sup>st</sup> 2021 and January 1<sup>st</sup> 2022, a multicentre international survey was conducted and included questions on mother-baby contact, breastfeeding support, single-room availability, psychological screening and follow-up, and psychological support for staff in ICUs serving obstetric units. Data from 928 ICUs were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physical contact was facilitated in 64.9% (n=602) of centres, while breastfeeding support was available in 82.2% (n=763). Single-room accommodation was accessible in 50%. Psychological screening for obstetric patients and follow-up were conducted in 30.6% (n=284) and 33.1% (n=307) of centres, respectively. In 61.7% (n=573) of ICUs, psychological support for staff was available following poor maternal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While breastfeeding support and some form of mother-baby contact were quite widely available, psychological screening, follow-up, and staff support after poor maternal outcomes remained inconsistent. National-level service mapping is needed to identify best practices and context-specific barriers. The impact of bundled interventions to improve maternal experience during critical illness, and staff support strategies after adverse maternal outcomes, should be formally evaluated in future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"104737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104737\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:产科重症监护患者在重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间面临着独特的挑战,包括与新生儿的分离和心理创伤。ICU的环境,主要是为了支持生理恢复,可能不适合产妇的经验。照顾这些病人的医护人员也可能经历心理困扰。这是MaCriCare研究的第三份报告,该研究审查了世卫组织欧洲各国icu管理产科患者的产妇经验、后续做法和工作人员支持规定。方法:在2021年9月1日至2022年1月1日期间,开展了一项多中心国际调查,包括母婴接触、母乳喂养支持、单间可用性、心理筛查和随访以及产科icu工作人员的心理支持等问题。对928例icu的数据进行分析。结果:64.9% (n=602)的中心提供身体接触,82.2% (n=763)的中心提供母乳喂养支持。50%的人可以提供单间住宿。30.6% (n=284)和33.1% (n=307)的中心分别对产科患者进行了心理筛查和随访。在61.7% (n=573)的icu中,工作人员在产妇结局不佳后可获得心理支持。结论:虽然母乳喂养支持和某种形式的母婴接触相当广泛,但不良产妇结局后的心理筛查、随访和工作人员支持仍然不一致。需要进行国家级服务映射,以确定最佳做法和特定于具体情况的障碍。在未来的研究中,应正式评估改善危重疾病期间孕产妇体验的捆绑干预措施的影响,以及不良孕产妇结局后的工作人员支持战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maternal experience in the intensive care unit and Post-discharge care: the third report from the MaCriCare study.

Background: Obstetric critical care patients face unique challenges during intensive care unit (ICU) admission, including separation from their newborns and psychological trauma. The ICU environment, primarily designed to support physiological recovery, may not be optimised for maternal experience. Healthcare staff caring for these patients may also experience psychological distress. This is the third report from the MaCriCare study, which examines maternal experiences, follow-up practices, and staff support provisions in ICUs managing obstetric patients across WHO Europe countries.

Methods: Between September 1st 2021 and January 1st 2022, a multicentre international survey was conducted and included questions on mother-baby contact, breastfeeding support, single-room availability, psychological screening and follow-up, and psychological support for staff in ICUs serving obstetric units. Data from 928 ICUs were analysed.

Results: Physical contact was facilitated in 64.9% (n=602) of centres, while breastfeeding support was available in 82.2% (n=763). Single-room accommodation was accessible in 50%. Psychological screening for obstetric patients and follow-up were conducted in 30.6% (n=284) and 33.1% (n=307) of centres, respectively. In 61.7% (n=573) of ICUs, psychological support for staff was available following poor maternal outcomes.

Conclusion: While breastfeeding support and some form of mother-baby contact were quite widely available, psychological screening, follow-up, and staff support after poor maternal outcomes remained inconsistent. National-level service mapping is needed to identify best practices and context-specific barriers. The impact of bundled interventions to improve maternal experience during critical illness, and staff support strategies after adverse maternal outcomes, should be formally evaluated in future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信