YouTube作为机器人膝关节置换术的信息来源：质量分析

IF 2.1 3区医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-11 DOI:10.1007/s00402-025-06024-2

Ebubekir Eravşar, Musa Ergin, Mustafa Citak

{"title":"YouTube作为机器人膝关节置换术的信息来源：质量分析","authors":"Ebubekir Eravşar, Musa Ergin, Mustafa Citak","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-06024-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>With the rise in robotic-assisted surgery, platforms like YouTube have become popular for patient education. Robotic total knee replacement (RTKR) is frequently featured, but the quality of content remains uncertain. This study evaluated the quality and educational value of YouTube videos on RTKR using standardized scoring systems.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A total of 100 videos related to robotic total knee replacement were identified through YouTube searches, and 38 of them were included in the study. Video characteristics, video sources, and video themes were recorded. Quality and content were assessed using DISCERN, JAMA Benchmark, Global Quality Score (GQS), and the Robotic Total Knee Replacement Score (RTKRS). The RTKRS scoring system was used to investigate the differences between robotic knee replacement and standard knee replacement.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The median scores were 28.25 for DISCERN, 2 for JAMA, 2 for GQS, and 1 for RTKRS. RTKRS was lower in patient-sourced videos than in physician- and speaker-sourced videos (<i>p</i> < 0.05). General knowledge-themed videos had higher RTKRS scores than patient testimony videos (<i>p</i> = 0.010). A negative correlation was found between view count and RTKRS, while video duration correlated positively with GQS. Only 24% of videos addressed differences in patient satisfaction. 21% discussed potential differences in complication rates, while only 13% covered prosthesis survival. In contrast, 82% mentioned alignment differences, and just 11% addressed cost differences.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite the increasing accessibility of robotic surgery information online, the quality of YouTube videos on robotic total knee replacement was generally low. Patient-generated content was particularly lacking in educational value, while professionally produced general information videos demonstrated better quality scores. Critical topics such as complication rates, prosthesis longevity, and patient satisfaction were underrepresented, suggesting a need for improved and more balanced online educational resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"YouTube as a source of information on robotic knee replacement: a quality analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ebubekir Eravşar, Musa Ergin, Mustafa Citak\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-06024-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>With the rise in robotic-assisted surgery, platforms like YouTube have become popular for patient education. Robotic total knee replacement (RTKR) is frequently featured, but the quality of content remains uncertain. This study evaluated the quality and educational value of YouTube videos on RTKR using standardized scoring systems.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A total of 100 videos related to robotic total knee replacement were identified through YouTube searches, and 38 of them were included in the study. Video characteristics, video sources, and video themes were recorded. Quality and content were assessed using DISCERN, JAMA Benchmark, Global Quality Score (GQS), and the Robotic Total Knee Replacement Score (RTKRS). The RTKRS scoring system was used to investigate the differences between robotic knee replacement and standard knee replacement.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The median scores were 28.25 for DISCERN, 2 for JAMA, 2 for GQS, and 1 for RTKRS. RTKRS was lower in patient-sourced videos than in physician- and speaker-sourced videos (<i>p</i> < 0.05). General knowledge-themed videos had higher RTKRS scores than patient testimony videos (<i>p</i> = 0.010). A negative correlation was found between view count and RTKRS, while video duration correlated positively with GQS. Only 24% of videos addressed differences in patient satisfaction. 21% discussed potential differences in complication rates, while only 13% covered prosthesis survival. In contrast, 82% mentioned alignment differences, and just 11% addressed cost differences.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite the increasing accessibility of robotic surgery information online, the quality of YouTube videos on robotic total knee replacement was generally low. Patient-generated content was particularly lacking in educational value, while professionally produced general information videos demonstrated better quality scores. Critical topics such as complication rates, prosthesis longevity, and patient satisfaction were underrepresented, suggesting a need for improved and more balanced online educational resources.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-06024-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-06024-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

随着机器人辅助手术的兴起，像YouTube这样的平台已经成为患者教育的热门平台。机器人全膝关节置换术（RTKR）经常出现，但内容的质量仍然不确定。本研究使用标准化评分系统评估YouTube视频在RTKR上的质量和教育价值。材料和方法通过YouTube搜索，共发现了100个与机器人全膝关节置换术相关的视频，其中38个被纳入研究。记录视频特征、视频来源和视频主题。使用DISCERN、JAMA基准、全球质量评分（GQS）和机器人全膝关节置换术评分（RTKRS）评估质量和内容。采用RTKRS评分系统研究机器人膝关节置换术与标准膝关节置换术的差异。结果患者的中位评分为：DISCERN 28.25分，JAMA 2分，GQS 2分，RTKRS 1分。患者来源的视频RTKRS低于医生和讲者来源的视频（p < 0.05）。常识主题视频的RTKRS评分高于患者证词视频（p = 0.010）。观看次数与RTKRS呈负相关，视频时长与GQS呈正相关。只有24%的视频提到了患者满意度的差异。21%的人讨论了并发症发生率的潜在差异，而只有13%的人讨论了假体的存活率。相比之下，82%的人提到了一致性差异，只有11%的人提到了成本差异。结论尽管在线机器人手术信息的可及性越来越高，但YouTube上关于机器人全膝关节置换术的视频质量普遍较低。患者制作的内容尤其缺乏教育价值，而专业制作的一般信息视频则表现出更高的质量分数。诸如并发症发生率、假体寿命和患者满意度等关键主题未被充分代表，这表明需要改进和更平衡的在线教育资源。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

YouTube as a source of information on robotic knee replacement: a quality analysis

Introduction

With the rise in robotic-assisted surgery, platforms like YouTube have become popular for patient education. Robotic total knee replacement (RTKR) is frequently featured, but the quality of content remains uncertain. This study evaluated the quality and educational value of YouTube videos on RTKR using standardized scoring systems.

Materials and methods

A total of 100 videos related to robotic total knee replacement were identified through YouTube searches, and 38 of them were included in the study. Video characteristics, video sources, and video themes were recorded. Quality and content were assessed using DISCERN, JAMA Benchmark, Global Quality Score (GQS), and the Robotic Total Knee Replacement Score (RTKRS). The RTKRS scoring system was used to investigate the differences between robotic knee replacement and standard knee replacement.

Results

The median scores were 28.25 for DISCERN, 2 for JAMA, 2 for GQS, and 1 for RTKRS. RTKRS was lower in patient-sourced videos than in physician- and speaker-sourced videos (p < 0.05). General knowledge-themed videos had higher RTKRS scores than patient testimony videos (p = 0.010). A negative correlation was found between view count and RTKRS, while video duration correlated positively with GQS. Only 24% of videos addressed differences in patient satisfaction. 21% discussed potential differences in complication rates, while only 13% covered prosthesis survival. In contrast, 82% mentioned alignment differences, and just 11% addressed cost differences.

Conclusions

Despite the increasing accessibility of robotic surgery information online, the quality of YouTube videos on robotic total knee replacement was generally low. Patient-generated content was particularly lacking in educational value, while professionally produced general information videos demonstrated better quality scores. Critical topics such as complication rates, prosthesis longevity, and patient satisfaction were underrepresented, suggesting a need for improved and more balanced online educational resources.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 医学-外科

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

13.00%

发文量

424

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).