{"title":"有尾母羊和断尾母羊及其羔羊的母儿关系","authors":"Jocelyn M. Woods, Sarah J.J. Adcock","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Maternal behavior in the hours after lambing is critical for establishing the lamb–dam bond. In rodents, early-life pain alters maternal behavior, but it is unclear whether routine painful procedures like tail docking have similar long-term effects in sheep. We tested whether neonatal tail docking in female lambs altered (1) their maternal behavior and their offspring’s behavior after lambing and (2) behavioral and physiological stress responses to separation. Polypay ewe lambs were tail docked using the rubber ring method between 24 and 36 h of age (n = 11) or left undocked (n = 10). At approximately 13 months of age, they gave birth to singleton (n = 6) or twin (n = 15) litters. Between 30 and 60 min after the last lamb’s birth, the ewe and her lamb(s) were moved to an individual maternity pen, where behaviors were video recorded for 2 h. Between 6 and 12 h after lambing, the lambs were separated from their dam for 15 min, with video recordings taken from 15 min before separation until 15 min after reunion. Eye temperatures of ewes and lambs were assessed using infrared thermography immediately before and after separation as indicators of physiological stress. For all video recordings, we analyzed the duration the ewe spent eating, pacing, lying, and grooming her lamb(s), as well as the duration the lambs spent wagging their tail, nursing, and lying. Transitions from lying to standing were also recorded for ewes and lambs in the 2-hour postnatal period. All models included the dam’s tail docking status as a fixed effect with litter size (singleton vs twin) as a factor covariate; separation models also included observation period (before, during, and after separation). We found no significant effect of the dam’s tail docking status on maternal and offspring behavior following lambing or on their responses to separation. However, lambs of undocked ewes tended to spend more time lying in the postnatal period compared to lambs of docked ewes. Behavioral changes during and after separation – including increased pacing and reduced eating in ewes during separation, and increased grooming and nursing following reunion – suggest that separation was stressful, regardless of the ewe’s tail docking status. No differences were observed in eye temperatures before and after separation. Overall, we did not find evidence to suggest that neonatal tail docking impairs the ewe’s ability to bond with or care for her lambs later in life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The maternal-offspring relationship in tailed and docked ewes and their lambs\",\"authors\":\"Jocelyn M. Woods, Sarah J.J. Adcock\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Maternal behavior in the hours after lambing is critical for establishing the lamb–dam bond. In rodents, early-life pain alters maternal behavior, but it is unclear whether routine painful procedures like tail docking have similar long-term effects in sheep. We tested whether neonatal tail docking in female lambs altered (1) their maternal behavior and their offspring’s behavior after lambing and (2) behavioral and physiological stress responses to separation. Polypay ewe lambs were tail docked using the rubber ring method between 24 and 36 h of age (n = 11) or left undocked (n = 10). At approximately 13 months of age, they gave birth to singleton (n = 6) or twin (n = 15) litters. Between 30 and 60 min after the last lamb’s birth, the ewe and her lamb(s) were moved to an individual maternity pen, where behaviors were video recorded for 2 h. Between 6 and 12 h after lambing, the lambs were separated from their dam for 15 min, with video recordings taken from 15 min before separation until 15 min after reunion. Eye temperatures of ewes and lambs were assessed using infrared thermography immediately before and after separation as indicators of physiological stress. For all video recordings, we analyzed the duration the ewe spent eating, pacing, lying, and grooming her lamb(s), as well as the duration the lambs spent wagging their tail, nursing, and lying. Transitions from lying to standing were also recorded for ewes and lambs in the 2-hour postnatal period. All models included the dam’s tail docking status as a fixed effect with litter size (singleton vs twin) as a factor covariate; separation models also included observation period (before, during, and after separation). We found no significant effect of the dam’s tail docking status on maternal and offspring behavior following lambing or on their responses to separation. However, lambs of undocked ewes tended to spend more time lying in the postnatal period compared to lambs of docked ewes. Behavioral changes during and after separation – including increased pacing and reduced eating in ewes during separation, and increased grooming and nursing following reunion – suggest that separation was stressful, regardless of the ewe’s tail docking status. No differences were observed in eye temperatures before and after separation. Overall, we did not find evidence to suggest that neonatal tail docking impairs the ewe’s ability to bond with or care for her lambs later in life.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"292 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002734\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The maternal-offspring relationship in tailed and docked ewes and their lambs
Maternal behavior in the hours after lambing is critical for establishing the lamb–dam bond. In rodents, early-life pain alters maternal behavior, but it is unclear whether routine painful procedures like tail docking have similar long-term effects in sheep. We tested whether neonatal tail docking in female lambs altered (1) their maternal behavior and their offspring’s behavior after lambing and (2) behavioral and physiological stress responses to separation. Polypay ewe lambs were tail docked using the rubber ring method between 24 and 36 h of age (n = 11) or left undocked (n = 10). At approximately 13 months of age, they gave birth to singleton (n = 6) or twin (n = 15) litters. Between 30 and 60 min after the last lamb’s birth, the ewe and her lamb(s) were moved to an individual maternity pen, where behaviors were video recorded for 2 h. Between 6 and 12 h after lambing, the lambs were separated from their dam for 15 min, with video recordings taken from 15 min before separation until 15 min after reunion. Eye temperatures of ewes and lambs were assessed using infrared thermography immediately before and after separation as indicators of physiological stress. For all video recordings, we analyzed the duration the ewe spent eating, pacing, lying, and grooming her lamb(s), as well as the duration the lambs spent wagging their tail, nursing, and lying. Transitions from lying to standing were also recorded for ewes and lambs in the 2-hour postnatal period. All models included the dam’s tail docking status as a fixed effect with litter size (singleton vs twin) as a factor covariate; separation models also included observation period (before, during, and after separation). We found no significant effect of the dam’s tail docking status on maternal and offspring behavior following lambing or on their responses to separation. However, lambs of undocked ewes tended to spend more time lying in the postnatal period compared to lambs of docked ewes. Behavioral changes during and after separation – including increased pacing and reduced eating in ewes during separation, and increased grooming and nursing following reunion – suggest that separation was stressful, regardless of the ewe’s tail docking status. No differences were observed in eye temperatures before and after separation. Overall, we did not find evidence to suggest that neonatal tail docking impairs the ewe’s ability to bond with or care for her lambs later in life.
期刊介绍:
This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals.
Topics covered include:
-Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare
-Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems
-Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation
-Methodological studies within relevant fields
The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects:
-Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals
-Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display
-Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage
-Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances
-Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements