社区脆弱性对城市、郊区和农村地区交通安全的影响存在差异

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ansley Kasha, Brian C. Tefft, Rebecca Steinbach
{"title":"社区脆弱性对城市、郊区和农村地区交通安全的影响存在差异","authors":"Ansley Kasha,&nbsp;Brian C. Tefft,&nbsp;Rebecca Steinbach","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social vulnerability refers to the susceptibility of individuals or communities to harm and is influenced by various inequities related to resources, opportunities, and social conditions. This study aims to investigate the association of motor vehicle crash fatalities with community vulnerability and variations between urban, suburban, and rural areas. Negative binomial regression models were used to estimate cross-sectional associations of population-based motor vehicle crash fatality rates with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) across all Census Tracts in the United States in 2018–2022. Associations were allowed to vary by area type. A decile increase in vulnerability was associated with 11% higher fatality rates in urban areas and 9% higher fatality rates in suburban areas (P &lt; 0.001) but only a 1% higher fatality rate in rural areas (P = 0.08). When individual components of vulnerability were examined, fatality rates were most strongly associated with the racial and ethnic minority status theme of the SVI in urban areas but with the socioeconomic status theme in suburban areas and rural areas. Most dimensions of the vulnerability measure were associated more strongly with pedestrian fatalities than with total crash fatalities. Strategies to reduce roadway mortality should account for complex relationships between social vulnerability and geographic location. Future research examining these relationships may help develop interventions that go beyond improving traffic safety, such as addressing social and economic inequities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 102146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community vulnerability influences traffic safety differently in urban, suburban, and rural areas\",\"authors\":\"Ansley Kasha,&nbsp;Brian C. Tefft,&nbsp;Rebecca Steinbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Social vulnerability refers to the susceptibility of individuals or communities to harm and is influenced by various inequities related to resources, opportunities, and social conditions. This study aims to investigate the association of motor vehicle crash fatalities with community vulnerability and variations between urban, suburban, and rural areas. Negative binomial regression models were used to estimate cross-sectional associations of population-based motor vehicle crash fatality rates with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) across all Census Tracts in the United States in 2018–2022. Associations were allowed to vary by area type. A decile increase in vulnerability was associated with 11% higher fatality rates in urban areas and 9% higher fatality rates in suburban areas (P &lt; 0.001) but only a 1% higher fatality rate in rural areas (P = 0.08). When individual components of vulnerability were examined, fatality rates were most strongly associated with the racial and ethnic minority status theme of the SVI in urban areas but with the socioeconomic status theme in suburban areas and rural areas. Most dimensions of the vulnerability measure were associated more strongly with pedestrian fatalities than with total crash fatalities. Strategies to reduce roadway mortality should account for complex relationships between social vulnerability and geographic location. Future research examining these relationships may help develop interventions that go beyond improving traffic safety, such as addressing social and economic inequities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525001665\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525001665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会脆弱性是指个人或社区对伤害的易感性,受到与资源、机会和社会条件有关的各种不平等的影响。本研究旨在探讨机动车碰撞死亡与社区脆弱性的关系,以及城市、郊区和农村地区之间的差异。使用负二项回归模型估计2018-2022年美国所有人口普查区基于人口的机动车碰撞死亡率与疾病控制和预防中心的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)的横断面关联。关联可以根据区域类型而变化。脆弱性每增加十分之一,城市地区死亡率增加11%,郊区死亡率增加9% (P <;0.001),但农村地区的死亡率仅高出1% (P = 0.08)。当检查脆弱性的各个组成部分时,死亡率与城市地区SVI的种族和少数民族地位主题联系最为密切,但与郊区和农村地区的社会经济地位主题联系最为密切。脆弱性测量的大多数维度与行人死亡人数的关系比与总事故死亡人数的关系更强。降低道路死亡率的战略应考虑到社会脆弱性与地理位置之间的复杂关系。未来对这些关系的研究可能有助于制定超越改善交通安全的干预措施,例如解决社会和经济不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community vulnerability influences traffic safety differently in urban, suburban, and rural areas
Social vulnerability refers to the susceptibility of individuals or communities to harm and is influenced by various inequities related to resources, opportunities, and social conditions. This study aims to investigate the association of motor vehicle crash fatalities with community vulnerability and variations between urban, suburban, and rural areas. Negative binomial regression models were used to estimate cross-sectional associations of population-based motor vehicle crash fatality rates with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) across all Census Tracts in the United States in 2018–2022. Associations were allowed to vary by area type. A decile increase in vulnerability was associated with 11% higher fatality rates in urban areas and 9% higher fatality rates in suburban areas (P < 0.001) but only a 1% higher fatality rate in rural areas (P = 0.08). When individual components of vulnerability were examined, fatality rates were most strongly associated with the racial and ethnic minority status theme of the SVI in urban areas but with the socioeconomic status theme in suburban areas and rural areas. Most dimensions of the vulnerability measure were associated more strongly with pedestrian fatalities than with total crash fatalities. Strategies to reduce roadway mortality should account for complex relationships between social vulnerability and geographic location. Future research examining these relationships may help develop interventions that go beyond improving traffic safety, such as addressing social and economic inequities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信