住宅固体燃料燃烧产生的初级碳质气溶胶质量吸收效率的变化

Lu Zhang, Yaojie Li, Tianyao Huang, Zhihan Luo, Jin Li, Bingjun Han, Wei Du, Xinlei Liu, Qirui Zhong, Guofeng Shen* and Shu Tao, 
{"title":"住宅固体燃料燃烧产生的初级碳质气溶胶质量吸收效率的变化","authors":"Lu Zhang,&nbsp;Yaojie Li,&nbsp;Tianyao Huang,&nbsp;Zhihan Luo,&nbsp;Jin Li,&nbsp;Bingjun Han,&nbsp;Wei Du,&nbsp;Xinlei Liu,&nbsp;Qirui Zhong,&nbsp;Guofeng Shen* and Shu Tao,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.5c00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >High uncertainty in aerosol radiative forcing assessment is closely associated with limited knowledge of the optical properties of carbonaceous aerosols in real environments. Residential fuel combustion is a major contributor to light-absorbing brown carbon (BrC) and black carbon (BC), yet their mass absorption efficiency (MAE) and association with complex chemical components remain poorly understood. This study investigated the MAE of BrC at λ = 370 nm (MAE<sub>BrC</sub>) and BC at λ = 880 nm (MAE<sub>BC</sub>), focusing on their variabilities attributed to organic chemical components through 131 burning tests involving various fuel-stove combinations. The MAE<sub>BrC</sub>, with an average of 4.8 ± 2.2 m<sup>2</sup>/g and a range of 0.35 to 10 m<sup>2</sup>/g, was comparable to previously reported values from field-based experiments; however, MAE<sub>BC</sub> (average: 8.7 ± 3.7 m<sup>2</sup>/g, range: 2.9–28 m<sup>2</sup>/g) was obviously lower than those field-based observations. This discrepancy was attributed to the greater dependence of MAE<sub>BC</sub> on combustion efficiency and highlighted the need for appropriate methodologies for measuring MAE values. MAE<sub>BC</sub> increased with the rise in organic carbon-to-element carbon ratios due to the lensing effect, which was a significant factor determining the MAE<sub>BC</sub> and explaining 36–77% of its variations. While MAE<sub>BrC</sub> mainly depended on the different BrC chromophores emitted during combustion with protein-like substances and humic-like substances being the predominant components of BrC derived from biomass and coal combustion, contributing 31% and 46% to the light absorption of extractable BrC from biomass and coal, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 7","pages":"1214–1225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations in the Mass Absorption Efficiency of Primary Carbonaceous Aerosols from Residential Solid Fuel Combustion\",\"authors\":\"Lu Zhang,&nbsp;Yaojie Li,&nbsp;Tianyao Huang,&nbsp;Zhihan Luo,&nbsp;Jin Li,&nbsp;Bingjun Han,&nbsp;Wei Du,&nbsp;Xinlei Liu,&nbsp;Qirui Zhong,&nbsp;Guofeng Shen* and Shu Tao,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestair.5c00022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >High uncertainty in aerosol radiative forcing assessment is closely associated with limited knowledge of the optical properties of carbonaceous aerosols in real environments. Residential fuel combustion is a major contributor to light-absorbing brown carbon (BrC) and black carbon (BC), yet their mass absorption efficiency (MAE) and association with complex chemical components remain poorly understood. This study investigated the MAE of BrC at λ = 370 nm (MAE<sub>BrC</sub>) and BC at λ = 880 nm (MAE<sub>BC</sub>), focusing on their variabilities attributed to organic chemical components through 131 burning tests involving various fuel-stove combinations. The MAE<sub>BrC</sub>, with an average of 4.8 ± 2.2 m<sup>2</sup>/g and a range of 0.35 to 10 m<sup>2</sup>/g, was comparable to previously reported values from field-based experiments; however, MAE<sub>BC</sub> (average: 8.7 ± 3.7 m<sup>2</sup>/g, range: 2.9–28 m<sup>2</sup>/g) was obviously lower than those field-based observations. This discrepancy was attributed to the greater dependence of MAE<sub>BC</sub> on combustion efficiency and highlighted the need for appropriate methodologies for measuring MAE values. MAE<sub>BC</sub> increased with the rise in organic carbon-to-element carbon ratios due to the lensing effect, which was a significant factor determining the MAE<sub>BC</sub> and explaining 36–77% of its variations. While MAE<sub>BrC</sub> mainly depended on the different BrC chromophores emitted during combustion with protein-like substances and humic-like substances being the predominant components of BrC derived from biomass and coal combustion, contributing 31% and 46% to the light absorption of extractable BrC from biomass and coal, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"volume\":\"2 7\",\"pages\":\"1214–1225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.5c00022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.5c00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气溶胶辐射强迫评估的高度不确定性与对真实环境中碳质气溶胶光学特性的有限认识密切相关。住宅燃料燃烧是吸收光的棕色碳(BrC)和黑碳(BC)的主要来源,但它们的质量吸收效率(MAE)及其与复杂化学成分的关系仍然知之甚少。本研究研究了λ = 370 nm处BrC (MAEBrC)和λ = 880 nm处BC (MAEBC)的MAE,通过131次不同燃料炉组合的燃烧试验,重点研究了有机化学成分对它们的影响。MAEBrC平均值为4.8±2.2 m2/g,范围为0.35 ~ 10 m2/g,与之前报道的野外实验值相当;MAEBC(平均值:8.7±3.7 m2/g,范围:2.9 ~ 28 m2/g)明显低于野外观测值。这一差异归因于MAE bc对燃烧效率的更大依赖,并强调需要适当的方法来测量MAE值。由于透镜效应,MAEBC随有机碳与元素碳比的增加而增加,这是决定MAEBC的一个重要因素,解释了其36-77%的变化。而MAEBrC主要依赖于燃烧过程中发出的不同BrC发色团,其中生物质和煤炭燃烧产生的BrC以蛋白质样物质和腐殖质样物质为主,分别对生物质和煤炭可提取BrC的光吸收贡献了31%和46%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Variations in the Mass Absorption Efficiency of Primary Carbonaceous Aerosols from Residential Solid Fuel Combustion

Variations in the Mass Absorption Efficiency of Primary Carbonaceous Aerosols from Residential Solid Fuel Combustion

High uncertainty in aerosol radiative forcing assessment is closely associated with limited knowledge of the optical properties of carbonaceous aerosols in real environments. Residential fuel combustion is a major contributor to light-absorbing brown carbon (BrC) and black carbon (BC), yet their mass absorption efficiency (MAE) and association with complex chemical components remain poorly understood. This study investigated the MAE of BrC at λ = 370 nm (MAEBrC) and BC at λ = 880 nm (MAEBC), focusing on their variabilities attributed to organic chemical components through 131 burning tests involving various fuel-stove combinations. The MAEBrC, with an average of 4.8 ± 2.2 m2/g and a range of 0.35 to 10 m2/g, was comparable to previously reported values from field-based experiments; however, MAEBC (average: 8.7 ± 3.7 m2/g, range: 2.9–28 m2/g) was obviously lower than those field-based observations. This discrepancy was attributed to the greater dependence of MAEBC on combustion efficiency and highlighted the need for appropriate methodologies for measuring MAE values. MAEBC increased with the rise in organic carbon-to-element carbon ratios due to the lensing effect, which was a significant factor determining the MAEBC and explaining 36–77% of its variations. While MAEBrC mainly depended on the different BrC chromophores emitted during combustion with protein-like substances and humic-like substances being the predominant components of BrC derived from biomass and coal combustion, contributing 31% and 46% to the light absorption of extractable BrC from biomass and coal, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信