离子和分子化合物溶解的解缠:化学中不同的概念和教学考虑

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Daniela Torres, Alex Xu and Binyomin Abrams*, 
{"title":"离子和分子化合物溶解的解缠:化学中不同的概念和教学考虑","authors":"Daniela Torres,&nbsp;Alex Xu and Binyomin Abrams*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Students often develop alternative conceptions about fundamental chemistry concepts, particularly regarding the dissolution of ionic, molecular, and acidic compounds. These naïve conceptions, which persist despite formal instruction, may stem from the ways in which chemistry is taught at the high school level. This study investigates how high school chemistry teachers conceptualize and teach dissolution as well as how alternative conceptions relating to these concepts arise in student understanding. Semistructured interviews were conducted with high school chemistry teachers and second-semester general chemistry students to analyze their understanding of dissolution through the lens of Johnstone’s triangle, which emphasizes the interplay between macroscopic observations, submicroscopic interactions, and symbolic representations. Findings indicate that teachers frequently rely on macroscopic demonstrations and submicroscopic particle models while de-emphasizing symbolic representations, particularly balanced chemical equations. Many teachers exhibited fragmented conceptions, often portraying HCl as an ionic compound or omitting key molecular-level processes in describing its dissolution. Furthermore, inconsistencies in textbook explanations and instructional language─such as the interchangeable use of “dissociation” and “ionization”─contribute to the confusion. As a result, students struggle to connect chemical equations with molecular-level processes, reinforcing alternative conceptions that persist in college-level chemistry. This study underscores the importance of helping students integrate symbolic representations alongside macroscopic and submicroscopic models. By explicitly addressing these instructional gaps and refining pedagogical approaches, educators can help students develop a more accurate and meaningful understanding of dissolution, ultimately supporting their progression in chemistry learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 7","pages":"2661–2672"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling the Dissolution of Ionic and Molecular Compounds: Alternative Conceptions and Teaching Considerations in Chemistry\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Torres,&nbsp;Alex Xu and Binyomin Abrams*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Students often develop alternative conceptions about fundamental chemistry concepts, particularly regarding the dissolution of ionic, molecular, and acidic compounds. These naïve conceptions, which persist despite formal instruction, may stem from the ways in which chemistry is taught at the high school level. This study investigates how high school chemistry teachers conceptualize and teach dissolution as well as how alternative conceptions relating to these concepts arise in student understanding. Semistructured interviews were conducted with high school chemistry teachers and second-semester general chemistry students to analyze their understanding of dissolution through the lens of Johnstone’s triangle, which emphasizes the interplay between macroscopic observations, submicroscopic interactions, and symbolic representations. Findings indicate that teachers frequently rely on macroscopic demonstrations and submicroscopic particle models while de-emphasizing symbolic representations, particularly balanced chemical equations. Many teachers exhibited fragmented conceptions, often portraying HCl as an ionic compound or omitting key molecular-level processes in describing its dissolution. Furthermore, inconsistencies in textbook explanations and instructional language─such as the interchangeable use of “dissociation” and “ionization”─contribute to the confusion. As a result, students struggle to connect chemical equations with molecular-level processes, reinforcing alternative conceptions that persist in college-level chemistry. This study underscores the importance of helping students integrate symbolic representations alongside macroscopic and submicroscopic models. By explicitly addressing these instructional gaps and refining pedagogical approaches, educators can help students develop a more accurate and meaningful understanding of dissolution, ultimately supporting their progression in chemistry learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"102 7\",\"pages\":\"2661–2672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00307\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生经常对基本化学概念产生不同的概念,特别是关于离子、分子和酸性化合物的溶解。尽管有正式的教学,这些naïve观念仍然存在,可能源于高中化学教学的方式。本研究探讨高中化学教师如何概念化和教授溶解,以及与这些概念相关的替代概念如何在学生的理解中出现。我们对高中化学教师和第二学期的普通化学学生进行了半结构化访谈,通过约翰斯通三角形的视角分析他们对溶解的理解。约翰斯通三角形强调宏观观察、亚微观相互作用和符号表征之间的相互作用。研究结果表明,教师经常依赖宏观演示和亚微观粒子模型,而不强调符号表示,特别是平衡的化学方程式。许多教师表现出支离破碎的概念,经常把HCl描绘成一种离子化合物,或者在描述其溶解时忽略了关键的分子水平过程。此外,教科书解释和教学语言的不一致──例如“解离”和“电离”的交替使用──也造成了混淆。因此,学生们很难将化学方程式与分子水平的过程联系起来,从而强化了在大学水平的化学中一直存在的另类概念。这项研究强调了帮助学生将符号表征与宏观和亚微观模型结合起来的重要性。通过明确地解决这些教学差距和改进教学方法,教育工作者可以帮助学生更准确、更有意义地理解溶解,最终支持他们在化学学习中的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Disentangling the Dissolution of Ionic and Molecular Compounds: Alternative Conceptions and Teaching Considerations in Chemistry

Disentangling the Dissolution of Ionic and Molecular Compounds: Alternative Conceptions and Teaching Considerations in Chemistry

Students often develop alternative conceptions about fundamental chemistry concepts, particularly regarding the dissolution of ionic, molecular, and acidic compounds. These naïve conceptions, which persist despite formal instruction, may stem from the ways in which chemistry is taught at the high school level. This study investigates how high school chemistry teachers conceptualize and teach dissolution as well as how alternative conceptions relating to these concepts arise in student understanding. Semistructured interviews were conducted with high school chemistry teachers and second-semester general chemistry students to analyze their understanding of dissolution through the lens of Johnstone’s triangle, which emphasizes the interplay between macroscopic observations, submicroscopic interactions, and symbolic representations. Findings indicate that teachers frequently rely on macroscopic demonstrations and submicroscopic particle models while de-emphasizing symbolic representations, particularly balanced chemical equations. Many teachers exhibited fragmented conceptions, often portraying HCl as an ionic compound or omitting key molecular-level processes in describing its dissolution. Furthermore, inconsistencies in textbook explanations and instructional language─such as the interchangeable use of “dissociation” and “ionization”─contribute to the confusion. As a result, students struggle to connect chemical equations with molecular-level processes, reinforcing alternative conceptions that persist in college-level chemistry. This study underscores the importance of helping students integrate symbolic representations alongside macroscopic and submicroscopic models. By explicitly addressing these instructional gaps and refining pedagogical approaches, educators can help students develop a more accurate and meaningful understanding of dissolution, ultimately supporting their progression in chemistry learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信