以反渗透为基础的饮用水回用处理系统净化厌氧处理的城市二级污水出水

IF 4.3 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jessica A. MacDonald, Benjamin Najm, Tzahi Cath and William A. Mitch*, 
{"title":"以反渗透为基础的饮用水回用处理系统净化厌氧处理的城市二级污水出水","authors":"Jessica A. MacDonald,&nbsp;Benjamin Najm,&nbsp;Tzahi Cath and William A. Mitch*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.5c00535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >As a pretreatment to potable reuse trains, anaerobic secondary treatment could reduce the energy demand and footprint compared to aerobic secondary treatment. Long-term pilot tests linked a reverse osmosis (RO)-based potable reuse treatment system to a pilot-scale staged anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR). A membrane-aerated bioreactor removed sulfide in SAF-MBR effluent prior to RO. The RO operated for ∼120 days at 15 LMH and 67–83% water recovery, with a final feed pressure during each cycle of ∼9–10 bar. When the final pressure increased to ∼12 bar, chemical cleaning reestablished membrane performance, and a membrane autopsy indicated reversible fouling by biomass and phosphate-based minerals. MS2 bacteriophage spiking tests indicated at least 5–6-log removal each by RO and UV/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> advanced oxidation process (AOP) treatment at ∼730 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> average UV fluence. A 1,100 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> average UV fluence met treatment goals for 1,4-dioxane and indicators for other organic contaminants. Halogenated DBPs in the chlorinated final effluent were ∼5-fold lower than potable reuse trains fed by aerobic secondary effluent. <i>N</i>-Nitrosodimethylamine was well below California’s 10 ng/L Notification Limit. An operating cost comparison indicated that a potable reuse train fed by SAF-MBR effluent ($0.69/m<sup>3</sup>) is cost-competitive to that fed by aerobic secondary effluent ($0.69/m<sup>3</sup>).</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 8","pages":"4877–4886"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Purifying Anaerobically Treated Municipal Secondary Wastewater Effluent by a Reverse Osmosis-Based Potable Reuse Treatment Train\",\"authors\":\"Jessica A. MacDonald,&nbsp;Benjamin Najm,&nbsp;Tzahi Cath and William A. Mitch*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestwater.5c00535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >As a pretreatment to potable reuse trains, anaerobic secondary treatment could reduce the energy demand and footprint compared to aerobic secondary treatment. Long-term pilot tests linked a reverse osmosis (RO)-based potable reuse treatment system to a pilot-scale staged anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR). A membrane-aerated bioreactor removed sulfide in SAF-MBR effluent prior to RO. The RO operated for ∼120 days at 15 LMH and 67–83% water recovery, with a final feed pressure during each cycle of ∼9–10 bar. When the final pressure increased to ∼12 bar, chemical cleaning reestablished membrane performance, and a membrane autopsy indicated reversible fouling by biomass and phosphate-based minerals. MS2 bacteriophage spiking tests indicated at least 5–6-log removal each by RO and UV/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> advanced oxidation process (AOP) treatment at ∼730 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> average UV fluence. A 1,100 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> average UV fluence met treatment goals for 1,4-dioxane and indicators for other organic contaminants. Halogenated DBPs in the chlorinated final effluent were ∼5-fold lower than potable reuse trains fed by aerobic secondary effluent. <i>N</i>-Nitrosodimethylamine was well below California’s 10 ng/L Notification Limit. An operating cost comparison indicated that a potable reuse train fed by SAF-MBR effluent ($0.69/m<sup>3</sup>) is cost-competitive to that fed by aerobic secondary effluent ($0.69/m<sup>3</sup>).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"volume\":\"5 8\",\"pages\":\"4877–4886\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为饮用水回用列车的预处理,厌氧二次处理与好氧二次处理相比,可以减少能量需求和足迹。长期中试试验将基于反渗透(RO)的饮用水回用处理系统与中试规模的厌氧流化膜生物反应器(SAF-MBR)联系起来。在反渗透之前,膜曝气生物反应器去除SAF-MBR出水中的硫化物。RO在15 LMH和67-83%的水回收率下运行了约120天,每个循环的最终进料压力为约9-10 bar。当最终压力增加到~ 12 bar时,化学清洗恢复了膜的性能,并且膜解剖表明生物质和磷酸盐基矿物的可逆污染。MS2噬菌体峰值试验表明,RO和UV/H2O2高级氧化工艺(AOP)处理在平均紫外线通量约730 mJ/cm2下,各至少去除5 - 6对数。平均紫外线通量为1,100兆焦耳/平方厘米,符合1,4-二恶烷的处理目标和其他有机污染物的指标。氯化最终出水中的卤化DBPs比由好氧二级出水供给的饮用水回用废水低约5倍。n -亚硝基二甲胺远低于加州10纳克/升的通知限值。运行成本比较表明,SAF-MBR出水(0.69美元/立方米)与好氧二级出水(0.69美元/立方米)相比具有成本竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Purifying Anaerobically Treated Municipal Secondary Wastewater Effluent by a Reverse Osmosis-Based Potable Reuse Treatment Train

Purifying Anaerobically Treated Municipal Secondary Wastewater Effluent by a Reverse Osmosis-Based Potable Reuse Treatment Train

As a pretreatment to potable reuse trains, anaerobic secondary treatment could reduce the energy demand and footprint compared to aerobic secondary treatment. Long-term pilot tests linked a reverse osmosis (RO)-based potable reuse treatment system to a pilot-scale staged anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR). A membrane-aerated bioreactor removed sulfide in SAF-MBR effluent prior to RO. The RO operated for ∼120 days at 15 LMH and 67–83% water recovery, with a final feed pressure during each cycle of ∼9–10 bar. When the final pressure increased to ∼12 bar, chemical cleaning reestablished membrane performance, and a membrane autopsy indicated reversible fouling by biomass and phosphate-based minerals. MS2 bacteriophage spiking tests indicated at least 5–6-log removal each by RO and UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process (AOP) treatment at ∼730 mJ/cm2 average UV fluence. A 1,100 mJ/cm2 average UV fluence met treatment goals for 1,4-dioxane and indicators for other organic contaminants. Halogenated DBPs in the chlorinated final effluent were ∼5-fold lower than potable reuse trains fed by aerobic secondary effluent. N-Nitrosodimethylamine was well below California’s 10 ng/L Notification Limit. An operating cost comparison indicated that a potable reuse train fed by SAF-MBR effluent ($0.69/m3) is cost-competitive to that fed by aerobic secondary effluent ($0.69/m3).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信