超声引导下选择性皮神经阻滞在经皮腔内血管成形术中治疗放射性头动静脉瘘的疗效。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Taisuke Shimizu, Tomonari Ogawa, Tatsuro Sano, Toru Hida, Akihiko Seo, Nozomi Abe, Takayuki Tohara, Shunsuke Takahashi, Akito Maeshima, Hajime Hasegawa
{"title":"超声引导下选择性皮神经阻滞在经皮腔内血管成形术中治疗放射性头动静脉瘘的疗效。","authors":"Taisuke Shimizu, Tomonari Ogawa, Tatsuro Sano, Toru Hida, Akihiko Seo, Nozomi Abe, Takayuki Tohara, Shunsuke Takahashi, Akito Maeshima, Hajime Hasegawa","doi":"10.1177/11297298251360849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for dysfunctional radial cephalic arteriovenous fistulas (RC-AVF) is associated with severe pain. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided selective cutaneous nerve block (SCNB) in reducing procedural pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 292 dialysis patients with RC-AVFs undergoing 292 PTA procedures were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the anesthesia method: infiltration anesthesia (IA, <i>n</i> = 50), ultrasound-guided infiltration anesthesia (USIA, <i>n</i> = 74), and USIA combined with SCNB (USIA + SCNB, <i>n</i> = 168). SCNB targeted the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN) in all cases, with additional superficial radial nerve (SRN) blocks performed in 106 cases at the operator's discretion. Ultrasound imaging with an 18 MHz linear probe was used to visualize nerves and veins, and 1% lidocaine was administered using a 25G 25 mm needle. Pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed among the IA, USIA, and USIA + SCNB groups. The mean NRS pain scores during balloon inflation were significantly lower in the USIA + SCNB group (2.33 ± 2.08) compared to the IA group (5.24 ± 2.34, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the USIA group (4.14 ± 2.70, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among 38 cases with isolated forearm lesions, there was no significant difference between LACN-only and LACN + SRN blocks (2.42 ± 2.04 vs 2.63 ± 1.92, <i>p</i> = n.s.). However, in 75 cases with isolated peri-anastomotic lesions, the addition of an SRN block significantly reduced pain compared to LACN block alone (1.77 ± 1.82 vs 3.00 ± 1.78, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCNB, particularly LACN block for forearm stenosis and combined LACN + SRN block for peri-anastomotic lesions, effectively reduces pain during PTA of RC-AVFs. When combined with USIA, SCNB further enhances analgesic effectiveness during PTA, and the two methods demonstrate a synergistic effect. This method provides safe, motor-sparing anesthesia, improving patient comfort in endovascular procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251360849"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective cutaneous nerve block during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas.\",\"authors\":\"Taisuke Shimizu, Tomonari Ogawa, Tatsuro Sano, Toru Hida, Akihiko Seo, Nozomi Abe, Takayuki Tohara, Shunsuke Takahashi, Akito Maeshima, Hajime Hasegawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251360849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for dysfunctional radial cephalic arteriovenous fistulas (RC-AVF) is associated with severe pain. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided selective cutaneous nerve block (SCNB) in reducing procedural pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 292 dialysis patients with RC-AVFs undergoing 292 PTA procedures were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the anesthesia method: infiltration anesthesia (IA, <i>n</i> = 50), ultrasound-guided infiltration anesthesia (USIA, <i>n</i> = 74), and USIA combined with SCNB (USIA + SCNB, <i>n</i> = 168). SCNB targeted the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN) in all cases, with additional superficial radial nerve (SRN) blocks performed in 106 cases at the operator's discretion. Ultrasound imaging with an 18 MHz linear probe was used to visualize nerves and veins, and 1% lidocaine was administered using a 25G 25 mm needle. Pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed among the IA, USIA, and USIA + SCNB groups. The mean NRS pain scores during balloon inflation were significantly lower in the USIA + SCNB group (2.33 ± 2.08) compared to the IA group (5.24 ± 2.34, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the USIA group (4.14 ± 2.70, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among 38 cases with isolated forearm lesions, there was no significant difference between LACN-only and LACN + SRN blocks (2.42 ± 2.04 vs 2.63 ± 1.92, <i>p</i> = n.s.). However, in 75 cases with isolated peri-anastomotic lesions, the addition of an SRN block significantly reduced pain compared to LACN block alone (1.77 ± 1.82 vs 3.00 ± 1.78, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCNB, particularly LACN block for forearm stenosis and combined LACN + SRN block for peri-anastomotic lesions, effectively reduces pain during PTA of RC-AVFs. When combined with USIA, SCNB further enhances analgesic effectiveness during PTA, and the two methods demonstrate a synergistic effect. This method provides safe, motor-sparing anesthesia, improving patient comfort in endovascular procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298251360849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251360849\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251360849","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)治疗功能不全的桡骨头动静脉瘘(RC-AVF)伴有严重疼痛。本研究评估超声引导下选择性皮神经阻滞(SCNB)在减轻手术性疼痛方面的效果。方法:对292例接受292次PTA治疗的rc - avf透析患者进行回顾性分析。根据麻醉方式将患者分为浸润麻醉(IA, n = 50)、超声引导下浸润麻醉(USIA, n = 74)、USIA联合SCNB (USIA + SCNB, n = 168)三组。SCNB在所有病例中都针对肱外侧皮神经(LACN), 106例患者根据操作者的判断进行了额外的桡浅神经(SRN)阻滞。18mhz线性探头超声显像显示神经和静脉,25G 25mm针头给予1%利多卡因。采用数值评定量表(NRS)评估疼痛。结果:IA组、USIA组和USIA + SCNB组的基线特征无显著差异。USIA + SCNB组充气期间NRS疼痛评分(2.33±2.08)明显低于IA组(5.24±2.34,p p p = n.s)。然而,在75例孤立性吻合口周围病变中,与单纯LACN阻滞相比,添加SRN阻滞可显著减轻疼痛(1.77±1.82 vs 3.00±1.78,p)。结论:SCNB,特别是LACN阻滞治疗前臂狭窄和LACN + SRN联合阻滞治疗吻合口周围病变,可有效减轻rc - avf PTA期间的疼痛。当与USIA联合使用时,SCNB进一步增强了PTA期间的镇痛效果,两种方法表现出协同作用。这种方法提供了安全的、节省运动的麻醉,提高了患者在血管内手术中的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective cutaneous nerve block during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas.

Background: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for dysfunctional radial cephalic arteriovenous fistulas (RC-AVF) is associated with severe pain. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided selective cutaneous nerve block (SCNB) in reducing procedural pain.

Methods: A total of 292 dialysis patients with RC-AVFs undergoing 292 PTA procedures were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the anesthesia method: infiltration anesthesia (IA, n = 50), ultrasound-guided infiltration anesthesia (USIA, n = 74), and USIA combined with SCNB (USIA + SCNB, n = 168). SCNB targeted the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN) in all cases, with additional superficial radial nerve (SRN) blocks performed in 106 cases at the operator's discretion. Ultrasound imaging with an 18 MHz linear probe was used to visualize nerves and veins, and 1% lidocaine was administered using a 25G 25 mm needle. Pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).

Results: No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed among the IA, USIA, and USIA + SCNB groups. The mean NRS pain scores during balloon inflation were significantly lower in the USIA + SCNB group (2.33 ± 2.08) compared to the IA group (5.24 ± 2.34, p < 0.001) and the USIA group (4.14 ± 2.70, p < 0.001). Among 38 cases with isolated forearm lesions, there was no significant difference between LACN-only and LACN + SRN blocks (2.42 ± 2.04 vs 2.63 ± 1.92, p = n.s.). However, in 75 cases with isolated peri-anastomotic lesions, the addition of an SRN block significantly reduced pain compared to LACN block alone (1.77 ± 1.82 vs 3.00 ± 1.78, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: SCNB, particularly LACN block for forearm stenosis and combined LACN + SRN block for peri-anastomotic lesions, effectively reduces pain during PTA of RC-AVFs. When combined with USIA, SCNB further enhances analgesic effectiveness during PTA, and the two methods demonstrate a synergistic effect. This method provides safe, motor-sparing anesthesia, improving patient comfort in endovascular procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信